Actually - the last two people are different - someone else has written the words "Riv Co Grand Jury" next to their name - I'm still trying to figure out why
I completely support opening source for public review and having people look for security flaws - I never said that I wasn't - if you read my report you would see that.
Sequoia says that opening source for public review is bad - not me.
The point is that Sequoia implies that Windows is not secure - then they use Windows - but by carefully wording their site they try to play down their use of Microsoft
I don't have it in for Microsoft - Sequoia is the one who posted negative things about Microsoft on their website.
If you think that form was an attendance sheet they you obviously haven't taken a look at it yet.
how many attandance sheets contain the words "...all tests performed resulted in accurate
voting of all units tested, including both touchscreen and absentee systems."
take a look at it:
http://www.exit.com/RiversideVoteTest/ObservationF orm.html
Slashdot Mirror
Actually - the last two people are different - someone else has written the words "Riv Co Grand Jury" next to their name - I'm still trying to figure out why
You don't know your Monty Python very well... bad Geek!
You have confused the Peace and Freedom Party with the Natural Law Party -
The P&F Party has nothing to do with the Natural Law Party - we are a left wing party with 80,000 members in California - and no cultic tendencies.
also, I am not a candidate for anything - I was asked to monitor the test on behalf of the party.
Sorry - but you missed the point
F orm.html
I completely support opening source for public review and having people look for security flaws - I never said that I wasn't - if you read my report you would see that.
Sequoia says that opening source for public review is bad - not me.
The point is that Sequoia implies that Windows is not secure - then they use Windows - but by carefully wording their site they try to play down their use of Microsoft
I don't have it in for Microsoft - Sequoia is the one who posted negative things about Microsoft on their website.
If you think that form was an attendance sheet they you obviously haven't taken a look at it yet.
how many attandance sheets contain the words "...all tests performed resulted in accurate voting of all units tested, including both touchscreen and absentee systems." take a look at it:
http://www.exit.com/RiversideVoteTest/Observation