I always looked as a hacker as someone who goes into a computer, not to harm, but to learn and someone who goes in with a malicious attempt a criminal. This guy did no harm and was trying to help the company. There was an article in a newpaper saying that companies were hiring people like this because they knew what they were doing and they could fix their problems better than some suit that was taught to find things like that for a living. What ever happened to that.
For the older generations for the most part all they had was the radio. Like my generation schedules their activities around the television, the older generations scheduled theirs around the radio. I do not think that juist because we have so much more ways to be entertained that the radio is less important to our lives. I still listen to the radio for the *ahem* variety it has, and it is less of a nuisance than changing cds all the time. I also agree that there should restrictions on content of radio. Most of the stations are owned by clear channel except for one and that is one of the best stations. I think that clear channel needs to give up the monopoly over the radio and then I think that radio will become better and more people will enjoy it.
Slashdot Mirror
I always looked as a hacker as someone who goes into a computer, not to harm, but to learn and someone who goes in with a malicious attempt a criminal. This guy did no harm and was trying to help the company. There was an article in a newpaper saying that companies were hiring people like this because they knew what they were doing and they could fix their problems better than some suit that was taught to find things like that for a living. What ever happened to that.
Who would go out into the job world and say..... I want to be a NASAL RANGER. To the olfactor and beyond...
For the older generations for the most part all they had was the radio. Like my generation schedules their activities around the television, the older generations scheduled theirs around the radio. I do not think that juist because we have so much more ways to be entertained that the radio is less important to our lives. I still listen to the radio for the *ahem* variety it has, and it is less of a nuisance than changing cds all the time. I also agree that there should restrictions on content of radio. Most of the stations are owned by clear channel except for one and that is one of the best stations. I think that clear channel needs to give up the monopoly over the radio and then I think that radio will become better and more people will enjoy it.