Suggest you read the archives on the Spamcop newsgroup - this was discussed at great length there, with various solutions offered, if I remember rightly. The fault is not with Spamcop, but with how email from Outlook is constructed.
Without knowing the IP address in question, it's kind of hard for anyone else to judge.
I use the SCBL as one of a range of filtering (not blocking) options on my personal email, and the few false positives I see (about 2 a week out of, oh, about 2000 emails on average) result from the Bayesian filter not the SCBL. I don't think I've ever seen a false positive resulting from using the SCBL. Doesn't mean it can't happen, I know, but it's not been my experience.
Slashdot Mirror
Suggest you read the archives on the Spamcop newsgroup - this was discussed at great length there, with various solutions offered, if I remember rightly. The fault is not with Spamcop, but with how email from Outlook is constructed.
Without knowing the IP address in question, it's kind of hard for anyone else to judge. I use the SCBL as one of a range of filtering (not blocking) options on my personal email, and the few false positives I see (about 2 a week out of, oh, about 2000 emails on average) result from the Bayesian filter not the SCBL. I don't think I've ever seen a false positive resulting from using the SCBL. Doesn't mean it can't happen, I know, but it's not been my experience.