He isn't writing a paper... he isn't in the 'industry'. Maybe you don't understand who 'makes' the language... Everyone does, so if the public uses the word hacker you better get used to it, because sooner, than later it's their definition that will prevail. Just look at http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hacker
and see how anal you realy are.
If we can't see a sugar cude on the moon right now, so how can we tell how this lens is focusing if at all? A few small defects in hubbles lens blured it bad, some thing this big would have alot of area for defects. to me that seams like it would make a very bad lens. So my real question is? how is this usefull?
He isn't writing a paper... he isn't in the 'industry'. Maybe you don't understand who 'makes' the language... Everyone does, so if the public uses the word hacker you better get used to it, because sooner, than later it's their definition that will prevail. Just look at http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hacker and see how anal you realy are.
If we can't see a sugar cude on the moon right now, so how can we tell how this lens is focusing if at all? A few small defects in hubbles lens blured it bad, some thing this big would have alot of area for defects. to me that seams like it would make a very bad lens. So my real question is? how is this usefull?
Atleast their not leaking radation huh :P