You're woefully out of touch; the days where Qt was technically superior to Gtk+ are long over. These days, Gtk+ is a better and more versatile toolkit.
Sorry, but you could not possibly have had any experience with Qt and Gtk to make that statement. Heck, I know of core Gnome developers are not so confused as to make such a claim. Qt (even in 3.X form) is half a decade ahead of Gtk from a developers standpoint. Gtk improves at a glacial pace (it is actually LOOSING ground technically to.Net) while Qt is consistently picked as possibly the most advanced software toolkit for desktop application development... on ANY platform.
There is a reason thousands of developers and companies, worldwide, PAY to use Qt... and it's not because Gtk is "technically superior."
Slashdot Mirror
You're woefully out of touch; the days where Qt was technically superior to Gtk+ are long over. These days, Gtk+ is a better and more versatile toolkit.
.Net) while Qt is consistently picked as possibly the most advanced software toolkit for desktop application development... on ANY platform.
Sorry, but you could not possibly have had any experience with Qt and Gtk to make that statement. Heck, I know of core Gnome developers are not so confused as to make such a claim. Qt (even in 3.X form) is half a decade ahead of Gtk from a developers standpoint. Gtk improves at a glacial pace (it is actually LOOSING ground technically to
There is a reason thousands of developers and companies, worldwide, PAY to use Qt... and it's not because Gtk is "technically superior."
Bobby