So, what happens in this legal wrangle to http://legolas.com/
which is hosting content about "Legolas" and Orlando Bloom?
Does it still constitute cybersquatting because someone other than the Tolkien Estate owns the
domain? Or is it the proerty of the person who currently owns it?
Well, that depends on on what you're currently doing with your system.
For example on one system which is pretty old (a P233), applying the recompiling performance optimizations let X run much faster.
I think they'd be less obvious on a faster box.
It really depensd on what bottlenext you're currently hitting.
Just a few points to note:
kern.ipc.nmbufs is by default, 4 times kern.ipc.nmbclusters. I should have made note of this, but once the later is tuned most peopel don't need to tune the former.
Reducing the size of your kernel *does* improve performance.
You should make it clear that if your server does not have a lot of physical memory, things like the values determined with maxusers=0, will be very low.
You're the second person to mention tuning(7), which means I can only assume you're also the second person to miss the last time of my first section:
"I have tried not to duplicate the data in the tuning(7) man page, which already contains a wealth of good information on the basics of system performance tuning.":-)
I'll happily go over and fix any errors I made. It's a living document.
Thanks for the good word:-)
I tried hard to cover things not mentioned in tuning(7). That page alreasdy has a lot of good stuff in it that I couldn't really improve.
I felt there was something missing though and when I first started performance tuning I found that the data I've written about isn't in one single location.
Of course, I'll keep adding to it as I learn more.
Hopefully in the next week I'll have a paper up on what you can do to your server to keep it up during DDoS attacks (or if you're slashdotted;)
Slashdot Mirror
Does it still constitute cybersquatting because someone other than the Tolkien Estate owns the domain? Or is it the proerty of the person who currently owns it?
Well, that depends on on what you're currently doing with your system. For example on one system which is pretty old (a P233), applying the recompiling performance optimizations let X run much faster. I think they'd be less obvious on a faster box. It really depensd on what bottlenext you're currently hitting.
Just a few points to note: kern.ipc.nmbufs is by default, 4 times kern.ipc.nmbclusters. I should have made note of this, but once the later is tuned most peopel don't need to tune the former. Reducing the size of your kernel *does* improve performance. You should make it clear that if your server does not have a lot of physical memory, things like the values determined with maxusers=0, will be very low. You're the second person to mention tuning(7), which means I can only assume you're also the second person to miss the last time of my first section: "I have tried not to duplicate the data in the tuning(7) man page, which already contains a wealth of good information on the basics of system performance tuning." :-)
I'll happily go over and fix any errors I made. It's a living document.
Thanks for the good word :-)
I tried hard to cover things not mentioned in tuning(7). That page alreasdy has a lot of good stuff in it that I couldn't really improve.
I felt there was something missing though and when I first started performance tuning I found that the data I've written about isn't in one single location.
Of course, I'll keep adding to it as I learn more.
Hopefully in the next week I'll have a paper up on what you can do to your server to keep it up during DDoS attacks (or if you're slashdotted ;)