Slashdot Mirror


User: NatasRevol

NatasRevol's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,627
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,627

  1. Re:Strategy? on First Look at Apple's Intel Developer Macs · · Score: 1

    I doubt it.

    Here's a good example of how easy iLife can be:
    http://www.theappleblog.com/2005/06/22/a-sapp y-app le-story/>

  2. Re:Driver Support on First Look at Apple's Intel Developer Macs · · Score: 1
  3. Re:Driver Support on First Look at Apple's Intel Developer Macs · · Score: 1
  4. Re:Strategy? on First Look at Apple's Intel Developer Macs · · Score: 1

    > Go ahead, try and beat that price and usability
    > anywhere. Just don't forget to charge $20/hr for
    > labor if you have to apt-get all the dependencies

    What apt-get dependencies? The whole point of
    apt-get (and cousins) is the fact that it "just
    works".


    You're missing the larger point. Try and find a suite of applications that work like iLife to create a (semi) professional DVD, on any platform. For $50. And are incredibly simple to use. Together.

    > just to print right, or get your video card to
    > run, or to get firewire DV input.

    All of these are functions of 3rd party
    vendor support. Apples aren't particularly good
    about this either.


    I'll give you the printers & video drivers, but are you seriously saying that there's a third party that Apple uses for Firewire?? They invented it, and still license it to every machine that uses it. (Except maybe Sony who I think co-created it)

    Apple critics have always criticized where Apple was several years ago without regard to where they are now.

  5. Re:Strategy? on First Look at Apple's Intel Developer Macs · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not cheap??

    It's $129 for a secure, easy to use OS with dozens of useful, functional apps thrown in. For $50 more, you can get a complete DVD production and burning system (iLife).

    Go ahead, try and beat that price and usability anywhere. Just don't forget to charge $20/hr for labor if you have to apt-get all the dependencies just to print right, or get your video card to run, or to get firewire DV input.

  6. Re:Here's what I think on First Look at Apple's Intel Developer Macs · · Score: 1, Informative

    Porting costs money, after all.

    I don't know if you saw, hear or read ANYthing about Steve Jobs' announcement on this, but I don't think checking an extra box to support both platforms is going to cost money.

    Just my $0.0000001

  7. Re:Slow. . . on Quark CEO Abruptly Resigns · · Score: 1

    2 reasons.

    Speed - what's the fastest OS 9 booting machine, 1.25 Ghz?

    Stability - OS X is light years ahead of OS 9, where rebooting daily is a requirement.

  8. Re:Apple, the new Be Incorporated on Does New Development For Mac OS X Make Sense? · · Score: 1

    Some AMD systems already run the OS X kernel:

    http://www.opendarwin.org/hardware/
    Select Systems, AMD, working

  9. Re:Apple's switch to Intel is sad on Does New Development For Mac OS X Make Sense? · · Score: 1

    Darwin, the kernel of OS X, does run on AMD machines. Probably just a matter of driver support for the pretty interface.

    http://www.opendarwin.org/hardware/
    Select Systems, AMD, Working and see if that makes you 'much happier'

  10. Re:Now is THE Time To be a Mac Developer on Does New Development For Mac OS X Make Sense? · · Score: 1

    The 10-client OS X server is $499. The client limitation is only restricted on clients connecting via AFP. Any other service - SMB, FTP, HTTP, SSH, DHCP, POP, IMAP, SMTP, etc - is unrestricted.

    And it's cheaper if you buy it in volume:
    http://store.apple.com/AppleStore/WebObjects/BizCu stom?qprm=78313&family=MacOSXServer

  11. Re:Flame on... on Mad as Hell, Switching to Mac · · Score: 1

    Filemaker is the best small(ish) database out there. Head & shoulders above Access.

  12. Re:Who designed the designer? on Kansas Challenges Definition of Science · · Score: 1

    Not much different that the 'what existed before the big bang' line of questioning.

    Let's say God created evolution at the big bang, and be done with all the arguing :-)

  13. Re:Too many fronts for Microsoft on Gates on Google · · Score: 1

    Now just imagine integrating Spotlight with Google's back end...

    And, no, that's not some dirty double entendre.

  14. Re:Linux needs a standard container on Why Aren't More Distros Becoming LSB Certified? · · Score: 1

    It's called ZeroConf, or Rendezvous (now Bonjour), and was designed by Apple. And you should see how it works in an OS that understands it well. Zero configuration, indeed!

    Say you're welcome to Steve Jobs....again.

  15. Re:Okay now... on Michael Robertson Says Root is Safe · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ohhh, oohh, is that an "analogy"?

    Cause it's a really, really, really dumb one.

  16. Re:LEDs are definitely becoming more powerful on LED Evolution Could Spell The End For Bulbs · · Score: 1

    Wow, but that's artifically biased.

    I'll leave it up to the reader to come up with at least 5 alternates for blue.

    As a simple example, blue light when the water is running out of your water cooled processor.

  17. Re:WS2K3 SP1 on Microsoft Releases Eight Security Updates · · Score: 1

    Now that's not true at all. I want my machine to generate power, which I can then use to run the cake machine.

    And the cake machine needs to assemble itself. Preferrably from other cakes.

    Keep your hands off my cakes!!

  18. Re:What's the Hold Up? on 10.4 on Display at FOSE · · Score: 1

    3 days? How many OS X upgrades have you gone through?

    Plan on 3 hours. But back up everything!

  19. Re:No conclusive evidence on Large Prize Offered For Writing Mac Virus · · Score: 1

    Ok,

    UDP5353 - Rendesvous - means you have an application listening for mDNS. ie, you've turned on a service/running an application.

    UDP514 - syslog - no way this is a default for a client, you must have turned it on for some reason. Maybe to log all the other services your waaaaay non-default box is running?

    Again, set up a new machine with a default install, run all the updates or not (doesn't matter), and see how many ports are open from the outside. None, nada, nothing. You have obviously taken your extremely customized box and assumed it's a default install, even though you're obviously running many applications/services that need or turn on ports.

    YOUR BOX IS NOT A DEFAULT INSTALL SO DON'T ACT LIKE IT IS!

  20. Re:What's wrong with finder? on Hacking Mac OS X · · Score: 1

    the Dock is so slow and awkward that it really doesn't.
    Yes, it really does work just fine. You can put folders in the Dock and even look in them. Try click and hold.

    You also can't have OS X automatically connect to network shares at login like OS 8.5-9.2.2 did.
    Yes you can.
    System Prefs>Accounts>>Startup Items.
    Works every day on 100 machines at work. With no problems.

  21. Re:No conclusive evidence on Large Prize Offered For Writing Mac Virus · · Score: 1

    Your box isn't even close to default. You have all kinds of services turned on.

    TCP 548 is AFP file sharing
    TCP 137 & 139 is freaking NetBIOS!!
    UDP 68 is bootp
    UDP 631 is Internet Printing Protocol

    My box has several ports open, but then I'm running server with SERVICES TURNED ON!

    Try doing a port scan from another box on a default OS X install and I'll tell you what you'll see. Nothing.

    And just FYI http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers

  22. Re:No conclusive evidence on Large Prize Offered For Writing Mac Virus · · Score: 1

    You're wrong as I suspected.

    OS X client comes with NO services turned on by default.

    OS X server comes with ONLY ssh turned on by default.

    While in Windows, I can use Microsoft's Remote Desktop (for Macs) to remotely control any w2k server or win2k3 because they have those services turned ON by default. Not to mention the half dozen or so other ports open and running by default as well.

  23. Re:What's wrong with finder? on Hacking Mac OS X · · Score: 1

    Much more effective for about 3 windows.

    However, if you have a dozen or so windows, there's no way to tell which one is which in Windows. But using Expose or a window in the Dock, you can just mouse over it and get a COMPLETE title of the window.

    Now that is much more effective.

  24. Re:No conclusive evidence on Large Prize Offered For Writing Mac Virus · · Score: 1

    By default, it had no "Internet-reachable external services". And I think this is even true of the server software at the time.

    Every service had to be turned on, whether that was downloading additional applications (on the client) or turning services (in the server).

  25. Re:Not as easy as you think on Large Prize Offered For Writing Mac Virus · · Score: 1

    Yeah, cause that'll run on a Mac.