Just b/c his typing, his use of language, knowledge, etc reminds you of someone that does NOT mean it is.
From bbc :
Despite his misgivings, Short eventually arranged to play the unknown opponent, and in October last year lost the first of their four confrontations 8-0.
Now, my question is, how many people in the world can beat Short 8-0, and who can they be?
La biblioth�que de Babel
on
Share The Pi!
·
· Score: 1
Make me think about this article in a French science magazine about "La bibliothèque de Babel".
Sorry, don't remember the title.
translation : "The Babel library"
Named after the guy who "invented" it.
This virtual library contains _many_ books...but a finite number of books.
The books contains 60 chars per line, 30 lines per page, and 500 pages per book...so 90000 chars total. (not sure about the numbers, but it's not important)
If the books uses an alphabet of 26 chars (a to z...sorry no caps), the space (" ") and the period char (".") we have 27 possible chars.
So 27^90000 different books (possibilities).
A book with all "a"s. The same book (all "a"s) but with one "b" at the end, a book about your life, a book about your life minus 20 years, a book on how the universe was created, etc... _And_ you have the same version in many languages (all the languages that uses this alphabet). In short, and infinite number of story...hrm wait a minute...it's a finite number (27^90000).:)
Is it just me, but each time KDE release new great features like this one, gnome users are there to flame KDE/QT?
Is it jealousy?
When there is a post about Gnome, I don't see any KDE users flaming the Gnome interface.
I think it just shows how immature Gnome users can be, and how you can see it with those desperate attempts (but kde is ugly, but kde uses QT which have licenses problems, etc...) to make people believe Gnome is better.
I see you Gnome fans saying that I'm criticizing people who flames KDE while I'm flaming Gnome users myself...Sorry for you guys, but I'm just tired and I had to let it go out >:).
Slashdot Mirror
“The cemeteries of the world are full of indispensable men.”
- Charles de Gaulle.
Just b/c his typing, his use of language, knowledge, etc reminds you of someone that does NOT mean it is.
From bbc :
Despite his misgivings, Short eventually arranged to play the unknown opponent, and in October last year lost the first of their four confrontations 8-0.
Now, my question is, how many people in the world can beat Short 8-0, and who can they be?
Make me think about this article in a French science magazine about "La bibliothèque de Babel". Sorry, don't remember the title.
translation : "The Babel library"
Named after the guy who "invented" it.
This virtual library contains _many_ books...but a finite number of books.
The books contains 60 chars per line, 30 lines per page, and 500 pages per book...so 90000 chars total. (not sure about the numbers, but it's not important)
If the books uses an alphabet of 26 chars (a to z...sorry no caps), the space (" ") and the period char (".") we have 27 possible chars.
So 27^90000 different books (possibilities).
A book with all "a"s. The same book (all "a"s) but with one "b" at the end, a book about your life, a book about your life minus 20 years, a book on how the universe was created, etc... _And_ you have the same version in many languages (all the languages that uses this alphabet). In short, and infinite number of story...hrm wait a minute...it's a finite number (27^90000).
P.S. Sorry for my english
Is it just me, but each time KDE release new great features like this one, gnome users are there to flame KDE/QT?
Is it jealousy?
When there is a post about Gnome, I don't see any KDE users flaming the Gnome interface.
I think it just shows how immature Gnome users can be, and how you can see it with those desperate attempts (but kde is ugly, but kde uses QT which have licenses problems, etc...) to make people believe Gnome is better.
I see you Gnome fans saying that I'm criticizing people who flames KDE while I'm flaming Gnome users myself...Sorry for you guys, but I'm just tired and I had to let it go out >:).