Your analogy is misleading.
It attempts to mislead the reader while using anology as a misdirection to make a reader think that an argument was being made that was not being made (that the cheapest computer is the best).
Your analogy is not about VALUE, but instead about COST. They are not the same thing.
A more honset analogy which would still align with your ideas would be:
Do you drive a cheaper car with less quality just because it is cheaper?
Please use anology in a more honest way in the future.
Thank you.
Slashdot Mirror
Your analogy is misleading. It attempts to mislead the reader while using anology as a misdirection to make a reader think that an argument was being made that was not being made (that the cheapest computer is the best). Your analogy is not about VALUE, but instead about COST. They are not the same thing. A more honset analogy which would still align with your ideas would be: Do you drive a cheaper car with less quality just because it is cheaper? Please use anology in a more honest way in the future. Thank you.