In my opinion, art is art independent of who creates it. But more importantly, this commentary is just like that which claims there can never be AI because no matter what a machine does it was created by people and thus people are the brains, and [blah blah blah]... . I've never bought into that idea. I guess it's for the same reason that I don't think a parent is necessarily reponsible for something his child does. For example, it's entirely possible that a kid brought up in a very good family who was cared for and loved can become a killer. Parents' fault?
So why is it necessary that art created by a machine be related back to the machine's human creators at all? Who cares where the machine came from?
Slashdot Mirror
In my opinion, art is art independent of who creates it. But more importantly, this commentary is just like that which claims there can never be AI because no matter what a machine does it was created by people and thus people are the brains, and [blah blah blah] ... . I've never bought into that idea. I guess it's for the same reason that I don't think a parent is necessarily reponsible for something his child does. For example, it's entirely possible that a kid brought up in a very good family who was cared for and loved can become a killer. Parents' fault?
So why is it necessary that art created by a machine be related back to the machine's human creators at all? Who cares where the machine came from?