Don't panic, it's not a security problem for you unless software developers choose to use it. I just can't see why they are giving us such a bad option.
23:25 EDT means 03:25 GMT throughout the year. The change of time zone is a change in local time, not a change in GMT. Say "So 23:25 EDT will be 03:25 in UK local time, not 04:25". </pedantic> Thanks for the reminder though.
let's be clear - I definitely think gates is saying something along the lines of "if you're not going to make an effort to
protect software, i wont make an effort to continue investing in your economy". That seems like a reasonable thing to say, doesn't it ?
I think I found the deliberate mistake. Do I win a prize?
Do they mean this one by any chance?
Slashdot has covered this before but, conspiracy theories aside, isn't the possibility of a backdoor enough to make this algorithm a misfeature?
Don't panic, it's not a security problem for you unless software developers choose to use it. I just can't see why they are giving us such a bad option.
On Linux, the ReiserFS and Reiser4 filesystems "squish small files together" to avoid this problem.
Write it in binary. That way every Mersenne prime will have a prime number of digits because (2^p - 1) divides (2^(pq) - 1)
We do it to envite redicule!
23:25 EDT means 03:25 GMT throughout the year.
The change of time zone is a change in local time, not a change in GMT.
Say "So 23:25 EDT will be 03:25 in UK local time, not 04:25".
</pedantic>
Thanks for the reminder though.
In the postscript to his announcement on moving away from BitKeeper, Linus rules out Subversion and states that Monotone "seems to be the most viable alternative".
Until I read that I had never heard of Monotone.
I think I found the deliberate mistake. Do I win a prize?
Although no longer updated, David E Sorkin's Don't Link to Us! page is still relevant.
A page like that could be useful for shaming companies into improving their linking policies.
EU readers please Thank Poland!
We shouldn't be surprised considering how high the stakes are for MS.
How much of this kind of funding from MS would it take to make it worthwhile for AutoZone or Daimler/Chrysler to deliberately lose against SCO?
Could there be a plan to fix a victorious precedent for SCO? MS will want to make the most of its investment.