I went to Pitt as an ugrad, and found that you got out of the program what you put into it. There where a couple of really good profs, and a few bad ones (at least one of which has retired, yay). I think the program is likely to get much better in coming years.
And I here they're getting a new building to replace the two WW I era ones they have now!
I'm at work on a network with a bunch of NT boxes. (don't cry for me too much) I'd really like to run something on the one of the ones in the server room. Oh well, I guess I'll have to get up and walk in there.
Call me lazy but how many of you have been there before? I think X is way better simply because it's built in a c/s way. And can use a network pretty transparently.
Yes, it would be nice if you could administer an NT box via telnet, but that's not feasible (I know, you can get telnetd for NT, they don't work well). And yes, I know you can get VNC, PC Anywhere, etc, and it works pretty well. But it's not multi-user, and it's not the same as X!
Slashdot Mirror
And I here they're getting a new building to replace the two WW I era ones they have now!
And if you go to Pitt, join The Zets!
Better than it could be...
Running on less hardware than it might have...
Call me lazy but how many of you have been there before? I think X is way better simply because it's built in a c/s way. And can use a network pretty transparently.
Yes, it would be nice if you could administer an NT box via telnet, but that's not feasible (I know, you can get telnetd for NT, they don't work well). And yes, I know you can get VNC, PC Anywhere, etc, and it works pretty well. But it's not multi-user, and it's not the same as X!