Do we really need to throw more hardware at this site? I know that the occasional oopsie has brought the site down, but with the last upgrade as well, people have said its the bandwidth stupid whenever things slow down. I'd like to see some stats like load, mem usage etc Dual P][266 sounds formidable enough. I could see the use for more ram to handle simutaneuous accesses, but that much more CPU?
I totally agree that the FreeBSD philosophy rocks and was thinking of starting a project like FreeBSD based on the Linux kernel. But it seems as though I am a bit late now. I just subscribed to the FreeLinux mailing lists and lets see how well they are doing. I will be glad to help.
I hope the x11amp team keeps up the good work despite all the stupid whining about the programs dependencies. I see that it is eats more CPU than mpg123, but its keeping up there with the presence winamp has, which some of us enjoy. mp3s in X will belong to x11amp for me.
uhm, I briefly saw the new design, but weren't there three little buttons on the bar which had the software name which linked to those things you mention?
Slashdot Mirror
Do we really need to throw more hardware at this site? I know that the occasional oopsie has brought the site down, but with the last upgrade as well, people have said its the bandwidth stupid whenever things slow down. I'd like to see some stats like load, mem usage etc
Dual P][266 sounds formidable enough. I could see the use for more ram to handle simutaneuous accesses, but that much more CPU?
What happens when I plug it into my board with 1MB L2? Does that become L3, additional L2, or is it just dropped?
tugrul
I totally agree that the FreeBSD philosophy rocks and was thinking of starting a project like FreeBSD based on the Linux kernel. But it seems as though I am a bit late now. I just subscribed to the FreeLinux mailing lists and lets see how well they are doing. I will be glad to help.
I think that first come first serve is the only fair way to deal with domain names. Its just too much of a pain and too costly any other way.
I hope the x11amp team keeps up the good work despite all the stupid whining about the programs dependencies. I see that it is eats more CPU than mpg123, but its keeping up there with the presence winamp has, which some of us enjoy. mp3s in X will belong to x11amp for me.
Just be happy with have a choice.
tugrul
uhm, I briefly saw the new design, but weren't there three little buttons on the bar which had the software name which linked to those things you mention?