Quite. Also, in the early years of digital cameras, they were hardly the tool of choice for "good" photographers (unlike, say, USENET, which started out as the plaything of the literary elite, before being sullied by the unwashed masses, with their trifling emoticons, and such:)
My point is that digital photography isn't worsening (if we can judge it as a whole, which we probably shouldn't, but somebody else brought up the subject), if anything, it is improving as more and more "photographers" use it.
Slashdot Mirror
...because they can't compete in a market where computer hardware has become a commodity? Oh, BOO HOO!!!
Quite. Also, in the early years of digital cameras, they were hardly the tool of choice for "good" photographers (unlike, say, USENET, which started out as the plaything of the literary elite, before being sullied by the unwashed masses, with their trifling emoticons, and such :)
My point is that digital photography isn't worsening (if we can judge it as a whole, which we probably shouldn't, but somebody else brought up the subject), if anything, it is improving as more and more "photographers" use it.