Slashdot Mirror


User: DD2

DD2's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Re:Naive a little? on Congress Pays You $3 Billion to Keep Watching TV · · Score: 1

    • 6% Trade Deficit (AKA sell-out to China)

    • X Trillion $ Budget Deficit (tax cuts for rich folks)

    • Grand Jury Investigation (shoot the messenger - he's radioactive)

    • Harriet Miers (Harriet who?)

    • Hurricane Katrina (no money for levees but see Budget Deficit)

    • Hurricane Katrina II (why can't my buddy run FEMA?)

    • Iraq (what is the plan?)

    • North Korea (it's getting better, hopefully)

    • Where is Osama Bin Laden? (Osama who - we've moved on)

    Still think you voted for the right guy?

  2. Re:Centralized directories are bad ! on Ciphire, A Transparent, Easy PGP Alternative · · Score: 1

    They have encrypted the private key with the user's passphrase. In order to replace the user's key-pair you must know the hash of the user's passphrase. A dictionary attck might work if the user has a weak paspshrase, otherwise this is reasonably secure.

    We did this 3 years ago at a company called CryptAll to provide an S/MIME-compliant java applet service.

  3. Law of Unintended Consequences on StorageTek Blocks 3rd Party Maintenance with DMCA · · Score: 1

    Isn't law great. A overly-broad, poorly thought out law get to cover something completely different. It could be a techie Monty Pyton sketch. I especially liked the non-persistence in RAM. Does that mean I have to erase each word in memory before storing the next one? It's a cool idea. Every computer in the world needs only 1 word of memory. The judge is a genius. I can only hope that most of the media companies who supported and pushed for DMCA use StorageTek kit.

  4. Hands off my brain! on Look Inside A PC-killing WIPO Treaty · · Score: 1

    Omigod! WIPO's banned my brain.

  5. Re:What gets me... on SCO Changes Tune, Again: Linux Now Just a Riff on Unix · · Score: 1

    I hadn't heard that before; what a good idea. But that's affecting the investor and it's difficult for CEOs/top-management to avail of short-term price fluctuations without getting stuck in the insider-trading briar patch. Make CEOs/top-management focus on long-term objectives as well as quarterly numbers. It's not difficult; just pay them that way. For example pay a CEO: - a salary (pretty-large) - stock options (should not vest if CEO fired) - a bonus based on percentage stock price increase from now every year for next 5 years. Note that this means that in 5-years the CEO is still getting paid for work they do this year.