And really, if you use SPEWS (or any dnsbl) you should provide an alternative means of contact in the body of the reject message. Like a web form or a phone number. Those who are truly "collateral damage" will take the time to contact your organization.
For the "innocent uesr" it's only slightly more inconvenient than JHD.
So, my collateral damage is 1 mail out of 65,000 blocked in about two months. And the one person is inconvenienced, not rejected with no way to contact their intended recipient.
Slashdot Mirror
And really, if you use SPEWS (or any dnsbl) you should provide an alternative means of contact in the body of the reject message. Like a web form or a phone number. Those who are truly "collateral damage" will take the time to contact your organization.
For the "innocent uesr" it's only slightly more inconvenient than JHD.
So, my collateral damage is 1 mail out of 65,000 blocked in about two months. And the one person is inconvenienced, not rejected with no way to contact their intended recipient.
I think that is pretty reasonable.
Can't do it... try that with microsoft.com, and see how much you miss with only 7 lines of output.