This is something I see more and more. If you don't believe in a specific viewpoint (typically the "progressive" far left view), and try to defend your belief, you can only be a SJW. If you want to discuss or have dialogue, you are one of "those" and must be silenced. Not the way the world should work, but take a peek at a College campus today. I have a kid that goes to College and numerous campuses are pretty much the same.
Sure, there are plenty of jobs to find out there and the better qualified people never fear losing a job. But.. there is exactly one company called Apple, and people spend years and years trying to get a job at Apple. Just like people do for Google, and Salesforce, and Oracle, and SAP, and to a lesser extent even Microsoft, IBM, and HP.
Established companies with proven longevity and potential for people to move up and around are not that common.
People don't scramble to an Apple interview because of the free snacks and drinks, those things are all over the place. In fact the startups will generally have more of those types of perks. People scramble for stability and name recognition.
Here you go. These lessons are in the first grade requirements, and you can find plenty of lessons in video online.
The tone of your message implies that you really don't care about your ignorance and don't believe you are, so I have no hope that you will actually investigate what you claim to be familiar with.
Please take your shilling elsewhere, or even better, don't. I have way too much experience with security at the National level for this trash to fly, and several others on this site have similar backgrounds.
Details: It is against the law to store classified documents on non-classified servers. Every politician working with classified data swears an oath to follow the law or be in violation of US Laws up to the crime of Treason. A red rubber stamp is not required for a message to be considered classified, a person entrusted with an office knows that questionable data is treated as classified until the appropriate intelligence agency determines otherwise and provides instruction. An elected official claiming "i did not know" is bullshit, because if they did not know the classification they must treat the document as the highest level of classification available to them.
Those rules were in place _before_ email was being used by political offices and have never been revoked, removed, or changed. Simply put, Hillary is a Liar just like you are a Liar.
References: NISP, DSS, and NISPOM, for starters. All standards are available from http://www.dss.mil/ for free. Further reading and standards can be found at NSA.GOV, US DOJ, FBI, and CIA. Also see DISA, and JF/AN which contains information for elected officials, NATO members, foreign nationals, etc...
Do not attempt to convince us that it's okay for her to break the law because she could not get what she _WANTED_. I really hope that you and the people up modding you are sock puppets and not really that foolish.
Come now, if you are going to go the conspiracy route you have to look deeper than a single layer. Trump is being attacked by _everyone_ except the public who is supporting him.
I find it much more likely that this is a two-for. Try and make Trump look bad and at the same time make Anonymous look bad. The elitist pricks holding power don't like either of them very much.
All that goodness out in the open, if Anonymous does not come out and declare victimization then it is most likely yet a poor mission by them. Not everything they have done has been successful or grand. I find the latter more likely than any conspiracy. Anonymous also threatened Hillary and did a bit of damage. Nothing that the corrupt media could not cover up, unfortunately.
I don't buy that one for a second, it makes way too much sense. I think it's people urinating on the 3rd rail, and we need another season of Mythbusters to prove it!
How many of the Mathematicians and Engineers working on those programs had computers at their disposal? How many of the trajectories were calculated by computer, how many models were made on a computer? The people did not have calculators in their brief cases, they had slide rules in their brief cases. They did not attend classes on programming in college, they had to do the work manually.
The ship having a couple of processors with less computer power than a hand calculator does not mean the people did.
All it takes to make a civilization dumb is for the education system to keep people so busy with bullshit that there is no real time or merit to education and critical thinking.
When we look at all of the special students on College campuses protesting their own personal micro aggression and squashing any opposing speech we see that this is really not that difficult to do. Video games, Facebook, "Reality" TV, and Sports are more important than silly wastes of time like "Math".
The "Common Core" addition method of dashes, boxes, and bigger boxes takes 100 times longer to do than simple addition, but simple addition will get a kid marked WRONG and the school threatening the parents with legal action if they interfere with the Government mandated system.
Half a century ago without computers we were able to land men on the moon. We had people like Milton Friedman and MLK to look up to. Today, we have nothing close, at least in public view.
This was not actually checking to see if a person was drunk, it was speculation that a person was. Similarly, the Government won't really check to see if you are drunk. They will check to see if you are a threat in any way, and then _claim_ that you are drunk.
When "drunk" has no definition provided, and the Government claims that anything from.5 and higher is drunk (1 drink), it should be obvious that this really is not about anyone's health.
I keep hearing people claim that there is a debate, but that is complete bullshit. The Feds are making demands, and people keep providing the same reasons over and over on why the Feds demands are wrong. There is no debate because the authoritarians in power don't care about right and wrong, or rights beyond their own. (They have them, you don't.)
I personally have no trust that if this went to the Supreme Court there would be a favorable outcome. Remember, Corporations are people, and the Feds can re-distribute _YOUR_ wealth however they see fit.
TPP is a secret agreement, developed by parties who are financially biased to make such an agreement, without any discourse or dialogue outside of interested parties.
The lies of NAFTA, having been exposed as lies, have much to do with why this is being done in secret. NAFTA was not developed by party, it was developed in much the same way. Except that people were able to question the alleged benefits before ratification. The so called "naysayers" who warned about not just NAFTA, but many other treaties and Acts have been proven right far too often.
I certainly appreciate the attorney's 50 days/reasons and the detail he goes into. I just don't think it's necessary for at least the US, who needs Congressional approval for a treaty. (I don't know Canada's laws, perhaps they have similar.) Any member of Congress that approves this "treaty" should be impeached, jailed, banished, or some other nice form of punishment for treason.
If you believe that your vote for a 3rd party will make your 3rd party candidate the winner, I can say with certainty that you are delusional.
Again. the point is being missed. The voters have nobody to blame but themselves on who wins. That's it, nothing else.
Who missed the point exactly? Go back and actually read what you are attempting to respond to. After that, if you wish to debate my position do so without cherry picking bits and pieces of my statements.
You can vote for whoever you wish, and honestly I hope everyone does. That said, the general populace will vote for the candidate they wish too. If you believe that your vote for a 3rd party will make your 3rd party candidate the winner, I can say with certainty that you are delusional.
The majority of people vote for who they see and hear the most, and happens to be a member of the party they believe best fits their world view. You won't hear much about 3rd party candidates, and the little you hear will be distorted to shape people's opinion's for them. We have not had fair coverage of a 3rd party candidate since Ross Perot, and in this incarnation of the US it won't happen. Ross Perot scared the hell out of the elites.
This is why Ron Paul was never referred to as Ron Paul on the "news". Ron Paul was referred to as "that crazy/cookie/insane Ron Paul", and his policies were only mentioned as "scary/bonkers/conspiracy theory/crazy policies".
Behold the power of MASS MEDIA! Stop thinking of R vs. D and think of "Tyrants" vs. "Society". The former is a small subset of people who own the land, the banks, the utilities, and the media.
There are plenty of places for you to educate yourself on the subject outside of Slashdot. I would strongly recommend that you do your homework in the future.
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly...
Demanding a company perform an action which is ILLEGAL in all other circumstances meets and exceeds the definition of abuse of power. If you want to use the common, and somewhat fallacious, argument of a safe: A safe maker may be compelled to produce a key for a safe, and reimbursed for the cost of making said key. If the safe owner modified the lock and the key does not work, the Government can NOT compel the safe maker to blow open the safe.
What the Government is demanding is not just for Apple to blow up the safe, they are requesting a permanent opening be made in ALL safes for their convenience. The only way this would meet probable cause would be to claim that ALL citizens are criminals. That last part is a violation of much more than the 4th amendment.
Are you signed up for the revolt? That is the only way you are going to get someone in charge who is not an authoritarian, wanting the FBI to get their way. Not a single candidate in either the Democratic or Republican party has mentioned the Constitutional protection which should exist. They have all said that the FBI should be able to do what they want, when they want, to whom they want.
In fact they have all said Safety is more important than Freedom and Government intrusion. (a couple have intentionally used double speak to try and hide it, but..)
States could easily back the Bitcoin digital currency without creating their own. That a central bank wants to re-invent the wheel is more a testament to how much money there is to be made by a central bank controlling currency. That a State plays along and goes with the central bank's version is a testament to the control Bankers have over Governments.
I watch and listen to politicians and commercials which discount this being a hoax. Several times a day I hear the ads about how men need to teach their kids not to beat up women (the assumption of course is that they all do). Several times a day I hear about the gender gap and how men just abuse women and keep them out of the technical jobs. Several times a day I hear about the wage gap and 70c on the dollar myth. Several times a day I hear about how men rape women without ever getting near them. (Today's was some reality TV woman claiming that some Uber driver raped her. But not really, he looked at her lustily and she 'thought' it could escalate into rape because he looked at her. *sigh* I really wish that I was joking.)
We in the intellectual crowd know that this is the upper crust trying to divide us to keep us busy. We have seen proof repeatedly that these are simply myths. The majority of the populous is not intellectual though. They fall for this just like they fall for celebrity gossip and reality TV.
While I certainly hope that this is a hoax, I am quite skeptical.
Flawed logic all the way around. You being able to memorize a book entry does not prevent your ability to WRITE down that information. In fact the better your memory really is, the easier that task would be. Just like being able to perform math in your head does not prevent you from writing down the numbers used to perform math.
While you may be truthfully claiming you had a idiot for a teacher, I find your claim of having a great memory to be quite suspect.
Slashdot Mirror
This is something I see more and more. If you don't believe in a specific viewpoint (typically the "progressive" far left view), and try to defend your belief, you can only be a SJW. If you want to discuss or have dialogue, you are one of "those" and must be silenced. Not the way the world should work, but take a peek at a College campus today. I have a kid that goes to College and numerous campuses are pretty much the same.
Sure, there are plenty of jobs to find out there and the better qualified people never fear losing a job. But.. there is exactly one company called Apple, and people spend years and years trying to get a job at Apple. Just like people do for Google, and Salesforce, and Oracle, and SAP, and to a lesser extent even Microsoft, IBM, and HP.
Established companies with proven longevity and potential for people to move up and around are not that common.
People don't scramble to an Apple interview because of the free snacks and drinks, those things are all over the place. In fact the startups will generally have more of those types of perks. People scramble for stability and name recognition.
Here you go. These lessons are in the first grade requirements, and you can find plenty of lessons in video online.
The tone of your message implies that you really don't care about your ignorance and don't believe you are, so I have no hope that you will actually investigate what you claim to be familiar with.
Please take your shilling elsewhere, or even better, don't. I have way too much experience with security at the National level for this trash to fly, and several others on this site have similar backgrounds.
Details: It is against the law to store classified documents on non-classified servers. Every politician working with classified data swears an oath to follow the law or be in violation of US Laws up to the crime of Treason. A red rubber stamp is not required for a message to be considered classified, a person entrusted with an office knows that questionable data is treated as classified until the appropriate intelligence agency determines otherwise and provides instruction. An elected official claiming "i did not know" is bullshit, because if they did not know the classification they must treat the document as the highest level of classification available to them.
Those rules were in place _before_ email was being used by political offices and have never been revoked, removed, or changed. Simply put, Hillary is a Liar just like you are a Liar.
References: NISP, DSS, and NISPOM, for starters. All standards are available from http://www.dss.mil/ for free. Further reading and standards can be found at NSA.GOV, US DOJ, FBI, and CIA. Also see DISA, and JF/AN which contains information for elected officials, NATO members, foreign nationals, etc...
Do not attempt to convince us that it's okay for her to break the law because she could not get what she _WANTED_. I really hope that you and the people up modding you are sock puppets and not really that foolish.
Come now, if you are going to go the conspiracy route you have to look deeper than a single layer. Trump is being attacked by _everyone_ except the public who is supporting him.
I find it much more likely that this is a two-for. Try and make Trump look bad and at the same time make Anonymous look bad. The elitist pricks holding power don't like either of them very much.
All that goodness out in the open, if Anonymous does not come out and declare victimization then it is most likely yet a poor mission by them. Not everything they have done has been successful or grand. I find the latter more likely than any conspiracy. Anonymous also threatened Hillary and did a bit of damage. Nothing that the corrupt media could not cover up, unfortunately.
I don't buy that one for a second, it makes way too much sense. I think it's people urinating on the 3rd rail, and we need another season of Mythbusters to prove it!
How many of the Mathematicians and Engineers working on those programs had computers at their disposal? How many of the trajectories were calculated by computer, how many models were made on a computer? The people did not have calculators in their brief cases, they had slide rules in their brief cases. They did not attend classes on programming in college, they had to do the work manually.
The ship having a couple of processors with less computer power than a hand calculator does not mean the people did.
All it takes to make a civilization dumb is for the education system to keep people so busy with bullshit that there is no real time or merit to education and critical thinking.
When we look at all of the special students on College campuses protesting their own personal micro aggression and squashing any opposing speech we see that this is really not that difficult to do. Video games, Facebook, "Reality" TV, and Sports are more important than silly wastes of time like "Math".
The "Common Core" addition method of dashes, boxes, and bigger boxes takes 100 times longer to do than simple addition, but simple addition will get a kid marked WRONG and the school threatening the parents with legal action if they interfere with the Government mandated system.
Half a century ago without computers we were able to land men on the moon. We had people like Milton Friedman and MLK to look up to. Today, we have nothing close, at least in public view.
This was not actually checking to see if a person was drunk, it was speculation that a person was. Similarly, the Government won't really check to see if you are drunk. They will check to see if you are a threat in any way, and then _claim_ that you are drunk.
When "drunk" has no definition provided, and the Government claims that anything from .5 and higher is drunk (1 drink), it should be obvious that this really is not about anyone's health.
Too bad for you that in addition to lacking knowledge, intellect, logic/reasoning abilities, you also lack ESP.
I keep hearing people claim that there is a debate, but that is complete bullshit. The Feds are making demands, and people keep providing the same reasons over and over on why the Feds demands are wrong. There is no debate because the authoritarians in power don't care about right and wrong, or rights beyond their own. (They have them, you don't.)
I personally have no trust that if this went to the Supreme Court there would be a favorable outcome. Remember, Corporations are people, and the Feds can re-distribute _YOUR_ wealth however they see fit.
TPP is a secret agreement, developed by parties who are financially biased to make such an agreement, without any discourse or dialogue outside of interested parties.
The lies of NAFTA, having been exposed as lies, have much to do with why this is being done in secret. NAFTA was not developed by party, it was developed in much the same way. Except that people were able to question the alleged benefits before ratification. The so called "naysayers" who warned about not just NAFTA, but many other treaties and Acts have been proven right far too often.
I certainly appreciate the attorney's 50 days/reasons and the detail he goes into. I just don't think it's necessary for at least the US, who needs Congressional approval for a treaty. (I don't know Canada's laws, perhaps they have similar.) Any member of Congress that approves this "treaty" should be impeached, jailed, banished, or some other nice form of punishment for treason.
If you believe that your vote for a 3rd party will make your 3rd party candidate the winner, I can say with certainty that you are delusional.
Again. the point is being missed. The voters have nobody to blame but themselves on who wins. That's it, nothing else.
Who missed the point exactly? Go back and actually read what you are attempting to respond to. After that, if you wish to debate my position do so without cherry picking bits and pieces of my statements.
You can vote for whoever you wish, and honestly I hope everyone does. That said, the general populace will vote for the candidate they wish too. If you believe that your vote for a 3rd party will make your 3rd party candidate the winner, I can say with certainty that you are delusional.
The majority of people vote for who they see and hear the most, and happens to be a member of the party they believe best fits their world view. You won't hear much about 3rd party candidates, and the little you hear will be distorted to shape people's opinion's for them. We have not had fair coverage of a 3rd party candidate since Ross Perot, and in this incarnation of the US it won't happen. Ross Perot scared the hell out of the elites.
This is why Ron Paul was never referred to as Ron Paul on the "news". Ron Paul was referred to as "that crazy/cookie/insane Ron Paul", and his policies were only mentioned as "scary/bonkers/conspiracy theory/crazy policies".
If that is true, I am very sorry about your disability.
According to the Washington Post? Really, you can't look at their records and form your own opinion based on facts?
I don't have time to list everything you have not been told by the Washington Post about those same people.
Behold the power of MASS MEDIA! Stop thinking of R vs. D and think of "Tyrants" vs. "Society". The former is a small subset of people who own the land, the banks, the utilities, and the media.
There are plenty of places for you to educate yourself on the subject outside of Slashdot. I would strongly recommend that you do your homework in the future.
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly ...
Demanding a company perform an action which is ILLEGAL in all other circumstances meets and exceeds the definition of abuse of power. If you want to use the common, and somewhat fallacious, argument of a safe: A safe maker may be compelled to produce a key for a safe, and reimbursed for the cost of making said key. If the safe owner modified the lock and the key does not work, the Government can NOT compel the safe maker to blow open the safe.
What the Government is demanding is not just for Apple to blow up the safe, they are requesting a permanent opening be made in ALL safes for their convenience. The only way this would meet probable cause would be to claim that ALL citizens are criminals. That last part is a violation of much more than the 4th amendment.
Are you signed up for the revolt? That is the only way you are going to get someone in charge who is not an authoritarian, wanting the FBI to get their way. Not a single candidate in either the Democratic or Republican party has mentioned the Constitutional protection which should exist. They have all said that the FBI should be able to do what they want, when they want, to whom they want.
In fact they have all said Safety is more important than Freedom and Government intrusion. (a couple have intentionally used double speak to try and hide it, but..)
Tyranny is frighteningly close.
States could easily back the Bitcoin digital currency without creating their own. That a central bank wants to re-invent the wheel is more a testament to how much money there is to be made by a central bank controlling currency. That a State plays along and goes with the central bank's version is a testament to the control Bankers have over Governments.
Nothing new here really.
Glad I'm not the only skeptic :)
Haha, you owe me a keyboard!
I watch and listen to politicians and commercials which discount this being a hoax. Several times a day I hear the ads about how men need to teach their kids not to beat up women (the assumption of course is that they all do). Several times a day I hear about the gender gap and how men just abuse women and keep them out of the technical jobs. Several times a day I hear about the wage gap and 70c on the dollar myth. Several times a day I hear about how men rape women without ever getting near them. (Today's was some reality TV woman claiming that some Uber driver raped her. But not really, he looked at her lustily and she 'thought' it could escalate into rape because he looked at her. *sigh* I really wish that I was joking.)
We in the intellectual crowd know that this is the upper crust trying to divide us to keep us busy. We have seen proof repeatedly that these are simply myths. The majority of the populous is not intellectual though. They fall for this just like they fall for celebrity gossip and reality TV.
While I certainly hope that this is a hoax, I am quite skeptical.
Flawed logic all the way around. You being able to memorize a book entry does not prevent your ability to WRITE down that information. In fact the better your memory really is, the easier that task would be. Just like being able to perform math in your head does not prevent you from writing down the numbers used to perform math.
While you may be truthfully claiming you had a idiot for a teacher, I find your claim of having a great memory to be quite suspect.