So what happens to the already built parts for the Hubble that was supposed to be installed in the HST anyway??
Also NASA is still going to have to send someone or something to make a predictable course for the HST to fall toward the Earth. No.. it won't totally burn up in the atmosphere, because of the titanium parts. So.. it would be a disaster even if the HST is not serviced.
This is the last mission so there won't be any more going back anyway.
its not a planet. in 2003 they found Quaoar which was supooosed to be more planet like then Pluto, but its long forgotten (which probably means they were wrong).
in six months or so this will be forgotten as well..
as for the speculation of a moon orbitting Sedna..because saying the orbitale period of Sedna is slow, it doesn't mean it has a moon. I'm sure that when the 'reddish looking comet' is closer to the Sun it will travel faster and will slow down when going along the aphelion.
Slashdot Mirror
So what happens to the already built parts for the Hubble that was supposed to be installed in the HST anyway?? Also NASA is still going to have to send someone or something to make a predictable course for the HST to fall toward the Earth. No.. it won't totally burn up in the atmosphere, because of the titanium parts. So.. it would be a disaster even if the HST is not serviced. This is the last mission so there won't be any more going back anyway.
its not a planet. in 2003 they found Quaoar which was supooosed to be more planet like then Pluto, but its long forgotten (which probably means they were wrong). in six months or so this will be forgotten as well.. as for the speculation of a moon orbitting Sedna..because saying the orbitale period of Sedna is slow, it doesn't mean it has a moon. I'm sure that when the 'reddish looking comet' is closer to the Sun it will travel faster and will slow down when going along the aphelion.