The way I have always done passive scanning is from the router. (assuming you are on the network and not tapping into it) You have the router copy all the packets to an entirely different port so your sniffer is off the main network. Therefore it is really impossibe to affect the network.
I think the problem is Einstein says time is not constant. I know its been proven but what is proven can be unproven. We invented time therefore it must remain a constant. Everything else can vary.
It would be interesting to see if it works in Hawking's case. It raises the question of what is thought exactly. Is our inner voice simply electrical signals stopped short of the tounge?
But this disclosure by NASA is short of the true capabiliy of this field of technology. If we can detect the electrical signals going to the vocal cords, can we also detect the signals coming from the optic nerve or even one step deeper, from the visual cortext itself and see what one imagines? I imagine it can be done. No pun inteded.
Slashdot Mirror
The way I have always done passive scanning is from the router. (assuming you are on the network and not tapping into it) You have the router copy all the packets to an entirely different port so your sniffer is off the main network. Therefore it is really impossibe to affect the network.
I think the problem is Einstein says time is not constant. I know its been proven but what is proven can be unproven. We invented time therefore it must remain a constant. Everything else can vary.
It would be interesting to see if it works in Hawking's case. It raises the question of what is thought exactly. Is our inner voice simply electrical signals stopped short of the tounge? But this disclosure by NASA is short of the true capabiliy of this field of technology. If we can detect the electrical signals going to the vocal cords, can we also detect the signals coming from the optic nerve or even one step deeper, from the visual cortext itself and see what one imagines? I imagine it can be done. No pun inteded.