Consider the article and a game called homeworld 2, I have discovered that there is a genuinely good approach to creating the perfact AI.
You introduce a model that says unit A is good against unit B, unit B is good against unit C, and unit C is good against unit A (complicate this model as much as possible if you like, but keep it circular! Next you consider the player's units after a level has been cleared in regards to number of units and the circular model described, and you have an AI whcih can be as monumentally stupid as humanly possible to concieve, but you will allways have a bitch of a time beating it!
I find it a bit amusing that noone bothered so far to mention the Myst games. Those games are quite straightforward what the use key on door concept is conserned, but the complexity of most puzzles is so vast that using a brutforce approach to crack a puzzle implies millions of permutations of the given combinatory dataset. You had to search for clues as to how to solve it, and some of the puzzles gave me quite a lot of headaches (literally).
Another game of interest in this genre would be Shivers 2: Harvest of souls. It's puzzles can't be compared to the nightmarish puzzles of Myst 1-5, but the eerie and creepy atmosphere of the game made it allmost impossible to solve the complex puzzles without putting them down on paper, turning off the computer, solving the puzzle offline, then start the game, and try your solution.
What I'm trying to point a scrutinizing finger at, is the singleminded focus on the "use key on door" phenomena. Game developers can easilly make an above par puzzle game (or even excellent puzzle game for that sakes matter) if they pay attention to the psychological and mathematical factors of any puzzle. Make the puzzle complex enough (i.e. permutations of possible solutions > 1000000), and add a suiting (i.e. extremely distracting) atmosphere to each scene, and you'll have a nice graphical game with the potential to leave the player breathless whilst giving him her quite an intellectual challenge (which is in fact required to solve a puzzle).
The next thing that wouldn't surprise me, is that Walton Simons gets the head position at FEMA, some guy called Bob Page breaks through with Nano Tech, and the UN launches an Anti-terrorist coalition named UNATCO (which conveniently has their HQ on Liberty Island).
When thinking of it, it isn't that fictitious after all...
this is facinating me somewhat, 'cause it somehow brings up this question I seem to be unable to answer myself...
If Linux, or the OSS if you may, can't survive unless MicroSoft grants access to their documentations and specs, who in the name of sweet lord Jesus managed to pull through the Samba Project support for MS clients?
BTW:
I heard this joke on Billy once (please mind the language): Bill Gates once bought a dutch prostitute, and screwed her as hard as he could. When they were done, she sighed and shook her head while saying: Now I know why it's called Microsoft...
Slashdot Mirror
Consider the article and a game called homeworld 2, I have discovered that there is a genuinely good approach to creating the perfact AI.
You introduce a model that says unit A is good against unit B, unit B is good against unit C, and unit C is good against unit A (complicate this model as much as possible if you like,
but keep it circular! Next you consider the player's units after a level has been cleared in regards to number of units and the circular model described, and you have an AI whcih can be as monumentally stupid as humanly possible to concieve, but you will allways have a bitch of a time beating it!
Perfect!
And upon launch of it's operational phase, Josh Whedon should sing that tune from the Houston control center.
And mod parent up. It IS a beautiful piece of text to include on that module if named Serenity.
I find it a bit amusing that noone bothered so far to mention the Myst games. Those games are quite straightforward what the use key on door concept is conserned, but the complexity of most puzzles is so vast that using a brutforce approach to crack a puzzle implies millions of permutations of the given combinatory dataset. You had to search for clues as to how to solve it, and some of the puzzles gave me quite a lot of headaches (literally). Another game of interest in this genre would be Shivers 2: Harvest of souls. It's puzzles can't be compared to the nightmarish puzzles of Myst 1-5, but the eerie and creepy atmosphere of the game made it allmost impossible to solve the complex puzzles without putting them down on paper, turning off the computer, solving the puzzle offline, then start the game, and try your solution. What I'm trying to point a scrutinizing finger at, is the singleminded focus on the "use key on door" phenomena. Game developers can easilly make an above par puzzle game (or even excellent puzzle game for that sakes matter) if they pay attention to the psychological and mathematical factors of any puzzle. Make the puzzle complex enough (i.e. permutations of possible solutions > 1000000), and add a suiting (i.e. extremely distracting) atmosphere to each scene, and you'll have a nice graphical game with the potential to leave the player breathless whilst giving him her quite an intellectual challenge (which is in fact required to solve a puzzle).
The next thing that wouldn't surprise me, is that Walton Simons gets the head position at FEMA, some guy called Bob Page breaks through with Nano Tech, and the UN launches an Anti-terrorist coalition named UNATCO (which conveniently has their HQ on Liberty Island).
When thinking of it, it isn't that fictitious after all...
this is facinating me somewhat, 'cause it somehow brings up this question I seem to be unable to answer myself...
If Linux, or the OSS if you may, can't survive unless MicroSoft grants access to their documentations and specs, who in the name of sweet lord Jesus managed to pull through the Samba Project support for MS clients?
BTW:
I heard this joke on Billy once (please mind the language):
Bill Gates once bought a dutch prostitute, and screwed her as hard as he could. When they were done, she sighed and shook her head while saying: Now I know why it's called Microsoft...