The US Constitution does not mention a higher power, although the Declaration of Independence does. Same for inalienable rights, though the Ninth Amendment ("The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.") does come close.
The Sixth Amendment has no restrictions to citizens, merely speaking of "the accused".
Would that include the time to search the web and download TeX/LaTeX, C/C++, GNU Emacs (or vi), Apache, etc. Oh wait, that takes zero time on Linux because most distros already have them. So how long would it take to do this in Windows XP?
OK. $79.99 for SuSe Linux 9.2 Pro, and 3 three hours to setup (mostly installation). Certainly less than the cost to upgrade to XP Pro. Also, the presence of multiple media means that you can upgrade several machines almost simultaneously.
Assuming that the results of different trials are independent, the variance should decrease as the number of trials increases (variance is proportional to 1/n, where n is the number of trials).
But Microsoft has already benefited from antitrust laws. Or did you think that IBM would have given Microsoft the deal it did if it were not for antitrust?
Also, would the OEM's form a cartel were it not for antitrust law?
And what about the 1958 consent decree signed by AT&T? How would Unix have developed in that case?
Slashdot Mirror
Would it take 12 years to teach someone to work in a factory? Hey, in the 1700's unschooled orphans could work in factories.
Actually, our numerals were originally from India.
The US Constitution does not mention a higher power, although the Declaration of Independence does. Same for inalienable rights, though the Ninth Amendment ("The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.") does come close.
The Sixth Amendment has no restrictions to citizens, merely speaking of "the accused".
A question about the word "may". Do you mean that it might not have the value 0xdeadbeef (but it might), or that it cannot have the value 0xdeadbeef?
The program's speed is directly proportional to how often a function is called? So the more the function is called, the faster the program?
Or is it the execution time that is proportional to how often the function is called?
Could this be fun!
You can only log in as you? You don't have separate admin and user accounts? I can log in as either myself or root.
But it's unlikely that they would have used Firefox-only design tools for their web pages.
Yeah, but I need to know something to prevent the recovery disk from wiping out my Linux partition.
OK, but how much time would I have to spend downloading GNU emacs, TeX/LaTeX, gcc, and so on?
Would that include the time to search the web and download TeX/LaTeX, C/C++, GNU Emacs (or vi), Apache, etc. Oh wait, that takes zero time on Linux because most distros already have them. So how long would it take to do this in Windows XP?
OK. $79.99 for SuSe Linux 9.2 Pro, and 3 three hours to setup (mostly installation). Certainly less than the cost to upgrade to XP Pro. Also, the presence of multiple media means that you can upgrade several machines almost simultaneously.
Lack of bias is insufficient. There may be subtle correlations between successive bits, which would increase the probability of spikes.
But is this quantum-indeterminate electric noise random? And I will be skeptical of this.
I'm reminded that Knuth wrote on random-number generating. I wonder if their algorithms would pass muster.
The moral of this story is that random numbers should not be generated with a method chosen at random. Some theory should be used.
Donald Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 2, 3rd Edition, page 6.
No, No, No! It's the clitoris!
Ah, but how do you generate your random numbers? Linear-congruential method?
She's a bit young. Now, Elizabeth Hurley. . .
But were those time ranges random? Or did they see the data before choosing the ranges?
Emotionalism? How about testing it during the Super Bowl?
Even airplane wings are consistent with Bernoulli's principle.
Assuming that the results of different trials are independent, the variance should decrease as the number of trials increases (variance is proportional to 1/n, where n is the number of trials).
As opposed to the stupid Dollar governement, or the stupid Yen government, . . . ? :-)
But Microsoft has already benefited from antitrust laws. Or
did you think that IBM would have given Microsoft the deal it did if it were not for antitrust?
Also, would the OEM's form a cartel were it not for antitrust law?
And what about the 1958 consent decree signed by AT&T? How would Unix have developed in that case?
Charlemagne's empire was hardly most of Europe.