The idea is web servers running your native code (or within 5% of its speed) securely on Google's servers. Even DOTNET vm running on AppEngine! (Not that i'd want taht, quick to add before i get stoned)
You know, reading the name of the project, I'd assume it runs on the client. As in, in the browser.
This disable-output-escaping makes simply no sense if you're having a valid xml-doc and an xslt-stylesheet to produce _valid_ xhtml (cause you don't need it for that).
It does, however, if you're trying to build makefiles with xml/xslt... but then you chose the wrong tool to produce the final result.
Your browser is made for displaying websites, not producing some weird output.
Because of this, the mozilla-guys are completely right if they say "no we won't".
In Soviet Russia... err... sorry, in Switzerland, you're allowed to drink beer and other drinks with low alcoholic content from your 16th birthday on. Drinks with more alcohol (schnapps and the like) from the 18th birthday on.
But this rules don't get very much attention... a twelve year old boy can go into a shop and buy wine as much as he likes... (well, not all shops. But most.)
-- Sorry for my english-skills. I hope they'll improve in the future:)
pre-image-attacks (you have a hash, search the original string) are impossible atm, even against md5. but it is (possibly) possible to find two strings/.../whatever that have the same hash-sum...
Slashdot Mirror
The idea is web servers running your native code (or within 5% of its speed) securely on Google's servers. Even DOTNET vm running on AppEngine! (Not that i'd want taht, quick to add before i get stoned)
You know, reading the name of the project, I'd assume it runs on the client. As in, in the browser.
How exactly would you run a browser on AppEngine?
You don't get it, huh?
This disable-output-escaping makes simply no sense if you're having a valid xml-doc and an xslt-stylesheet to produce _valid_ xhtml (cause you don't need it for that).
It does, however, if you're trying to build makefiles with xml/xslt... but then you chose the wrong tool to produce the final result.
Your browser is made for displaying websites, not producing some weird output.
Because of this, the mozilla-guys are completely right if they say "no we won't".
it's a shame i don't have modpoints...
"drinking under 21"
:)
In Soviet Russia... err... sorry, in Switzerland, you're allowed to drink beer and other drinks with low alcoholic content from your 16th birthday on. Drinks with more alcohol (schnapps and the like) from the 18th birthday on.
But this rules don't get very much attention... a twelve year old boy can go into a shop and buy wine as much as he likes... (well, not all shops. But most.)
--
Sorry for my english-skills. I hope they'll improve in the future
the gnome-guys are investigating this problem, iirc. don't allow other than the active application to "steal"/take focus.
"Only Intellisense is slightly in VS due to showing the parameter names."
Eclipse does that too, if you attach the source-code.
pre-image-attacks (you have a hash, search the original string) are impossible atm, even against md5. but it is (possibly) possible to find two strings/.../whatever that have the same hash-sum...