to Quagga - we use it within CZFree.Net and it works like charm (ospf, bgp) since ~1 year ago. opsfd6 is still not that charming as it should be.
The main point of quagga is that you can take some old PC, put our favorite OS on it, plug 3 100MBit ethernet and 3 WiFi NICs into it and have a nice root-router;-)
The original aim of the Liberouter project was the development of a multigigabit IPv6 and IPv4 PC-based router with an open design and software and firmware being completely open-source. In order to speed-up the forwarding and filtering functions, we developed a hardware accelerator card, COMBO6, which utilises the flexible technology of Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA). Thanks to its open-ended design, COMBO6 soon found other interesting applications, so far mainly in the networking area.:)
Re:Does the XD1 give the illusion of shared memory
on
Cray XD1 Now Available
·
· Score: 1
Cant one use some parts of NUMA kernel?
It was designed by SGI after they've acquired Cray...
Well anyway, I suppose you can run something like http://www.mosix.org/ on the XD1 racks:)
This would be the case if the US had have carpet-bombed Bagdad, Basra, Nadzaf, wiped out few villages, their troops tortured, killed, disappeared, raped civilians off the streets as a part of any military campaign waged there etc; (roughly 1/3 - 1/4 of the nation would get killed or lost http://www.hrw.org/photos/2002/chechnya/), the US press would had then refused to publicize proofs of those atrocities, coz it would be non-patriotic. If the US representatives would refused to negotiate or even talk with any (even the moderate and certainly not fundamentalist) representatives of the country in question (Maschadov in the Chechnya case). If in the case of nearly any trouble the US press would say "a person of Arab (Caucasian in the Russian case) look was seen there".
Under such circumstances you may say that it is "just like the US in Iraq"
Forthemore, it seems that the Beslan attack has been performed mostly by Ossetians, Ingush and Arab muslim radicals. Whoever was it has surely nothing to do with Chechen citizens nor Maschadov.
Twirlip of the Mists> Noone here is impugning property rights.
However to claim ownership and exclusivnes of *ideas* is certainly NOT part of our culture, on the contrary - the whole protestant (and then the humanist, development of natural sciences,..) movement was based on the idea, that all should have the access to the *knowledge* (so translating the Bible into local languages etc).
Dont forget that the whole success of Euro-Atlantic civilisation is founded on kowledge (=> technology) which is most efficiently achieved if people can freely share, exchange and iprove their ideas.
BTW, The regulation on freedom of information increased dramatically over ast 3 decades compared to the past. You could pattent some particular design, but never the idea (take semiconductors for example).
So the ownership of ideas is the issue, so please dont change the topic into the freedom of ownership, that DIFFERENT concept and was never intended to protect IDEAS.
Slashdot Mirror
to Quagga - we use it within CZFree.Net and it works like charm (ospf, bgp) since ~1 year ago. opsfd6 is still not that charming as it should be. The main point of quagga is that you can take some old PC, put our favorite OS on it, plug 3 100MBit ethernet and 3 WiFi NICs into it and have a nice root-router ;-)
The original aim of the Liberouter project was the development of a multigigabit IPv6 and IPv4 PC-based router with an open design and software and firmware being completely open-source. In order to speed-up the forwarding and filtering functions, we developed a hardware accelerator card, COMBO6, which utilises the flexible technology of Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA). Thanks to its open-ended design, COMBO6 soon found other interesting applications, so far mainly in the networking area. :)
Cant one use some parts of NUMA kernel?
...
:)
It was designed by SGI after they've acquired Cray
Well anyway, I suppose you can run something like http://www.mosix.org/ on the XD1 racks
> Just like the US and Iraq, I suppose.
This would be the case if the US had have carpet-bombed Bagdad, Basra, Nadzaf, wiped out few villages, their troops tortured, killed, disappeared, raped civilians off the streets as a part of any military campaign waged there etc; (roughly 1/3 - 1/4 of the nation would get killed or lost http://www.hrw.org/photos/2002/chechnya/), the US press would had then refused to publicize proofs of those atrocities, coz it would be non-patriotic. If the US representatives would refused to negotiate or even talk with any (even the moderate and certainly not fundamentalist) representatives of the country in question (Maschadov in the Chechnya case).
If in the case of nearly any trouble the US press would say "a person of Arab (Caucasian in the Russian case) look was seen there".
Under such circumstances you may say that it is "just like the US in Iraq"
Forthemore, it seems that the Beslan attack has been performed mostly by Ossetians, Ingush and Arab muslim radicals. Whoever was it has surely nothing to do with Chechen citizens nor Maschadov.
> Maybe I should consider learning Chinese.
we had joke in communistic times which went like this:
"What is optimism, pesimism and realism really all about?
Optimists learm English.
Pesimists learn Chinese.
Realist learn to shoot."
Twirlip of the Mists> Noone here is impugning property rights. However to claim ownership and exclusivnes of *ideas* is certainly NOT part of our culture, on the contrary - the whole protestant (and then the humanist, development of natural sciences, ..) movement was based on the idea, that all should have the access to the *knowledge* (so translating the Bible into local languages etc).
Dont forget that the whole success of Euro-Atlantic civilisation is founded on kowledge (=> technology) which is most efficiently achieved if people can freely share, exchange and iprove their ideas.
BTW, The regulation on freedom of information increased dramatically over ast 3 decades compared to the past. You could pattent some particular design, but never the idea (take semiconductors for example).
So the ownership of ideas is the issue, so please dont change the topic into the freedom of ownership, that DIFFERENT concept and was never intended to protect IDEAS.
gentoo.org ?