Well that's just Reagan vs Carter all over again. Iran knew Carter wouldn't bomb them if they didn't release the hostages. Reagan pretty much promised to. Iran released the hostages the moment Reagan was elected.
From most of the accounts of the Iran hostage crisis that I have read, it always seemed fairly clear that Carter did all of the negotiations to free the hostages, and Iran only waited until Reagan took office before releasing them to spite Carter for his support of the Shah. Unrelated events also put pressure on Iran to end the standoff, such as the USSR invading their neighbor Afghanistan and being invaded themselves by Iraq. That last part was probably the biggest driver for an end to the crisis, as Iran was fielding primarily American military hardware and hoped that by releasing the hostages they could secure parts and supplies to keep their military going.
If you want to pay for that go ahead, although most companies are more than happy to use their already overworked and underpaid staff, possibly add in a few contractors, and have (mostly) working software slightly after the due date (which nobody believed in the first place) that meets the business needs for 1/10th or less of the cost.
Also, I don't know where you have been working, but IT is far from the only department running poorly in most companies I have seen.
TL;DR version: most companies are not flying in space.
There were a lot of problems in the early 5.x releases, which led to a lot of criticizm from everyone who was used to the rock solid 4.x versions. If you browse through the release engineering section on the FreeBSD website http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html, you will find some articles discussing changes to the release engineering process that occured in response to the problems experienced during 5.x.
Re:Sorry Folks: HD just not worth the effort.
on
Voom No More
·
· Score: 1
I disagree. Watch sports or movies on a larger HD set, and you will see the need. As more and more big screen TVs show up in consumers' homes, more and more consumers notice how bad the picture on regular television is.
Why would you think 720x486 resolution is good enough on a 50+ inch monitor when you demand a minimum of 1024x768 on even a 17" computer monitor?
Well that's just Reagan vs Carter all over again. Iran knew Carter wouldn't bomb them if they didn't release the hostages. Reagan pretty much promised to. Iran released the hostages the moment Reagan was elected.
From most of the accounts of the Iran hostage crisis that I have read, it always seemed fairly clear that Carter did all of the negotiations to free the hostages, and Iran only waited until Reagan took office before releasing them to spite Carter for his support of the Shah. Unrelated events also put pressure on Iran to end the standoff, such as the USSR invading their neighbor Afghanistan and being invaded themselves by Iraq. That last part was probably the biggest driver for an end to the crisis, as Iran was fielding primarily American military hardware and hoped that by releasing the hostages they could secure parts and supplies to keep their military going.
If by free you mean $40 each.
If you want to pay for that go ahead, although most companies are more than happy to use their already overworked and underpaid staff, possibly add in a few contractors, and have (mostly) working software slightly after the due date (which nobody believed in the first place) that meets the business needs for 1/10th or less of the cost. Also, I don't know where you have been working, but IT is far from the only department running poorly in most companies I have seen. TL;DR version: most companies are not flying in space.
Nice, it shows me the video box but when I press play it says "Not available in your area".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes
There were a lot of problems in the early 5.x releases, which led to a lot of criticizm from everyone who was used to the rock solid 4.x versions. If you browse through the release engineering section on the FreeBSD website http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html, you will find some articles discussing changes to the release engineering process that occured in response to the problems experienced during 5.x.
This is where you should take advantage of one of FreeBSD's greatest assets, it's documentation. The SMP Project has a lot of info...
http://www.freebsd.org/smp/
I disagree. Watch sports or movies on a larger HD set, and you will see the need. As more and more big screen TVs show up in consumers' homes, more and more consumers notice how bad the picture on regular television is. Why would you think 720x486 resolution is good enough on a 50+ inch monitor when you demand a minimum of 1024x768 on even a 17" computer monitor?