Yeah...you do realize Orwell was a right-wing nutbag, right? His 1984 was squarely aimed at...the commies! *shock* *horror* a world with no rich people, whatever are we to do?
In the end, they decided to shrink Germany, split it in two, ethnically cleanse all Germans from areas outside German borders and write a new constitution for them.
Light has a lower angular momentum inside an dialectric than in air or vaccum. This means that it imparts a force upon entering a dialectric and upon exiting a dialectric. If it is combined out of phase within the dialectic, then destructive interference will mean that the entering and exiting force imparted by the light beams will be out of balance (as the intensity of the exiting beam will be lower without any radiation-pressure type interactions being required) and there will be a net repulsive force.
If the beam is exiting the dialectric with a lower intensity as it normally would, where goes all the energy?
Microsoft irrevocably promises not to assert any Microsoft Necessary Claims against you for making, using, selling, offering for sale, importing or distributing any implementation, to the extent it conforms to one of the Covered Specifications, and is compliant with all of the required parts of the mandatory provisions of that specification
It includes "using". So I do not receive the rights from the distributor of a MONO application, but I, as a user, am directly granted the right to use it from the microsoft community promise.
The real question is: does that cover "modifying"? Might be interesting for distributors which may want to patch Mono.
The fact that you have to conform to the standards is however a real restriction. It makes some sense, to avoid someone else playing an embrace-extend-hijack on them, like they tried with Java... however this also means that if I invent my own language+runtime D# that infringes on some microsoft C# patents this does not protect me.
Would be interesting where that puts Vala. It's very similar to C#.
(...) to the extent it conforms to one of the Covered Specifications, and is compliant with all of the required parts of the mandatory provisions of that specification ("Covered Implementation") [...]
Interesting. I was already wondering wth a "covered implementation" might be.
How the hell is that comment insightful? There are flourescents that are the same size as the incandescents you're used to with a warm spectrum. What about updating your knowledge from ~5 years ago?
Slashdot Mirror
And I'm still shocked that they banned the APPD. Seriously.
This german woman must be viewing the internet through some sort of time portal
The term you are looking for may be "printer".
Riots will only serve as a scarecrow.
Yeah...you do realize Orwell was a right-wing nutbag, right? His 1984 was squarely aimed at...the commies! *shock* *horror* a world with no rich people, whatever are we to do?
So how could this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homage_to_Catalonia have happened?
Frankly, I'm fucking scared of the western world and have been for a few years. I really, really want my own planet.
I second that.
In the end, they decided to shrink Germany, split it in two, ethnically cleanse all Germans from areas outside German borders and write a new constitution for them.
The new constitution was written by germans: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grundgesetz#Drafting_process Of course, approval had to be obtained.
Since concepts like "health care" are also included: I vote for the laws of thermodynamics.
What about: the ability to discover context, to abstract, to apply knowledge and to solve problems with that abilities.
It doesn't. But most people are forced to do stuff they don't care about. It's called work, you insensitive clod!
And i thought this had something to do with the Hamiltonian Principle. Turns out it's only CS.
That's no solution, that's asking for trouble.
Quantum talk? Is this like small talk, only more fuzzy?
It only separates the lines using Maginot Line Feeds.
That's handy. You only need a piece of paper to write a whole book on, this way.
Light has a lower angular momentum inside an dialectric than in air or vaccum. This means that it imparts a force upon entering a dialectric and upon exiting a dialectric. If it is combined out of phase within the dialectic, then destructive interference will mean that the entering and exiting force imparted by the light beams will be out of balance (as the intensity of the exiting beam will be lower without any radiation-pressure type interactions being required) and there will be a net repulsive force.
If the beam is exiting the dialectric with a lower intensity as it normally would, where goes all the energy?
My guess is, they will develop an AJAX based NX client ... BETA.
Maybe the next version could be called NetSolaris. We could install it on very large toasters.
I always wondered if they would run Linux. But you cleared it all up now. It's just so obvious.
You mean, we are moderating all our own post? Wow, that just blew my mind...
+5 redundant? Are you an IT professional? :)
Texty? WTF?! ITYM slang. NGOML!
It's called "adding context" and should have been in the summary, anyway. It's called HTML for a reason.
Microsoft irrevocably promises not to assert any Microsoft Necessary Claims against you for making, using, selling, offering for sale, importing or distributing any implementation, to the extent it conforms to one of the Covered Specifications, and is compliant with all of the required parts of the mandatory provisions of that specification
It includes "using". So I do not receive the rights from the distributor of a MONO application, but I, as a user, am directly granted the right to use it from the microsoft community promise.
The real question is: does that cover "modifying"? Might be interesting for distributors which may want to patch Mono.
The fact that you have to conform to the standards is however a real restriction. It makes some sense, to avoid someone else playing an embrace-extend-hijack on them, like they tried with Java... however this also means that if I invent my own language+runtime D# that infringes on some microsoft C# patents this does not protect me.
Would be interesting where that puts Vala. It's very similar to C#.
Interesting. I was already wondering wth a "covered implementation" might be.
Why? We'll get a C# compiler, what's bad or unimportant about that?
How the hell is that comment insightful? There are flourescents that are the same size as the incandescents you're used to with a warm spectrum. What about updating your knowledge from ~5 years ago?
There may be a quote from pre-Abrams Star Trek in here ("Code of Honor", TNG perhaps).