I'm guessing you're a douche bag that can't read. Because they have to prefund it soaks up their budget. Without prefunding they would not have a budget issue and can operate within their means.
"after the trial" - according to whom? Samsung. How do we know this? Are the case records no longer available? Certainly Samsung would have that information since they own Seagate....
That's not true. Samsung's legal team knew about Hogan because they handled that case between Hogan and Seagate. So it begs the question: Why didn't Samsung, kick him off the jury?
Based on what evidence? Apple has been sued left and right based on the success of the iPhone. Apple paid through the nose to use the term "iPad" only to have a Chinese company sue them because the license Apple agreed to did not cover one area in China.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually it does - since it's in the constitution. Twit.
I'm guessing you're a douche bag that can't read. Because they have to prefund it soaks up their budget. Without prefunding they would not have a budget issue and can operate within their means.
Somebody's itching to move to Somalia...
Tell that to Corporate America paying CEO pensions....
No one else pre-funds pensions moron. Pensions are not the problem.
It was congress douche bag.
So you missed that bit about the not running on taxes....
His own words shows he gave his OPINION to the other jurors. The other jurors were free to disregard it.
"after the trial" - according to whom? Samsung. How do we know this? Are the case records no longer available? Certainly Samsung would have that information since they own Seagate....
THANK YOU!
EXACTLY!
That's not true. Samsung's legal team knew about Hogan because they handled that case between Hogan and Seagate. So it begs the question: Why didn't Samsung, kick him off the jury?
Actually no they are not. All they can get him on is IF he disregarded the jury instructions.
He actively gave other jurors his OPINION which the other jurors were free to disregard.
He introduced his OPINION to other jurors....the man should be shot!
How do you hold a juror in contempt of court for expressing his OPINION during deliberation?
LMOL - That's not what Samsung is claiming moron. Samsung is claiming he disregarded jury instructions and unduly influenced the other jurors....
Really? I have a Galaxy Tab, it's ridiculous for Samsung to suggest otherwise...
Samsung's legal team handled that case too. So Samsung knew about this problem juror but chose to do nothing...
As well as International Law.
And you're being a fucking moron - match made in heaven....
Because they removed them from the app store....moron....
Hey douche bag, you realize Apple is legally forced to do this. RTFA!
Based on what evidence? Apple has been sued left and right based on the success of the iPhone. Apple paid through the nose to use the term "iPad" only to have a Chinese company sue them because the license Apple agreed to did not cover one area in China.
Seriously do some research.
Umm yes that's why they stuck with XP for as long as they did. Get your head out of your ass.