Read the Rambus complaint for yourself instead of just believing the regurgitated crap.
http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/nsd/rmbs/custom/050504pr3_civilcomplaint.pdf
There are lots of quotes attributed to HiNicks, MyCon and Infringeon execs, that were withheld by the thieves, but were found via 3rd party discovery, courtesy the FTC, whom the infringers designated to fry Rambus. Guess what? The FTC Chief ALJ exhonerated Rambus and instead cited Rambus's "superior" technology as the reason they enjoy a monopoly. Here is the 300+ page FTC Initial Decision with numerous findings of fact that support Rambus's antitrust case, in case you are interested.
http://www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9302/040223initialde cision.pdf
In the Infringeon case, a Federal appeals court overturned findings of fraud and non-infringement against Rambus. The Supreme Court agreed.
BTW, the Department of Justice has their very own antitrust case against the same parties that Rambus is up against, for price-fixing.
Slashdot Mirror
Read the Rambus complaint for yourself instead of just believing the regurgitated crap. http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/nsd/rmbs /custom/050504pr3_civilcomplaint.pdf
There are lots of quotes attributed to HiNicks, MyCon and Infringeon execs, that were withheld by the thieves, but were found via 3rd party discovery, courtesy the FTC, whom the infringers designated to fry Rambus. Guess what? The FTC Chief ALJ exhonerated Rambus and instead cited Rambus's "superior" technology as the reason they enjoy a monopoly. Here is the 300+ page FTC Initial Decision with numerous findings of fact that support Rambus's antitrust case, in case you are interested.
http://www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9302/040223initialde cision.pdf
In the Infringeon case, a Federal appeals court overturned findings of fraud and non-infringement against Rambus. The Supreme Court agreed.
BTW, the Department of Justice has their very own antitrust case against the same parties that Rambus is up against, for price-fixing.