After reading the complaint the term is price constriant essentially, so any price manipulation counts. This suit should be dismissed on some Rule 12 motion. Also, check his notion of the address, it is so sad that he presented this when he knew it would be in the public eye as a preserved document, done under contemplation. May be it wasn't, and was just a drunking gag gone bad?
.
I wish to take a moment to disabuse of a fact. The FSF does not manage GCC. Where would you get that idea from? Furthermore despite what Mr. Drepper feels, if his code is in glibc then his work is part of glibc.
This book violates the GPL. If anyone who has a copy or has read the book, I suggest carefully reviewing his discussion of the GPL. He is referencing paragraphs of the GPL that are not in the appended version of the GPL. This violates the GPL.
Slashdot Mirror
Seriously man you can. Let us also consider the fact that this was in Holland. wink wink. I wish I got the boss to "send" me to that conference.
After reading the complaint the term is price constriant essentially, so any price manipulation counts. This suit should be dismissed on some Rule 12 motion. Also, check his notion of the address, it is so sad that he presented this when he knew it would be in the public eye as a preserved document, done under contemplation. May be it wasn't, and was just a drunking gag gone bad? .
I wish to take a moment to disabuse of a fact. The FSF does not manage GCC. Where would you get that idea from? Furthermore despite what Mr. Drepper feels, if his code is in glibc then his work is part of glibc.
This book violates the GPL. If anyone who has a copy or has read the book, I suggest carefully reviewing his discussion of the GPL. He is referencing paragraphs of the GPL that are not in the appended version of the GPL. This violates the GPL.