Our group evaluated a handful of workgroup tools: issue tracking, revision control, documentation. Trac was in the list, but it fell short on a number of points after we tried it for a simple project. We wanted SVN integration and liked Mantis, so we hooked in scmbug. It took a little tweaking to setup the 'products' in scmbug to meet our Mantis usage pattern, but it does the trick. Throw on your favorite wiki (mediawiki, twiki, moinmoin, etc.), and you are covered.
I'll second that suggestion. I used a Scanjet 4xxx series w/ an ADF at work, and it was super. I assumed the 5550C would only be better. WRONG!
The jams with the ADF make it worthless, agreed. But the thing that makes even the flatbed nearly useless as well is the drivers. They are absolutley the worst pieces of software I have ever seen. The v2 drivers hose up the system (pc+scanner) so badly that they both have to be reset, and the v1.2 drivers force you to 'preview' everything once before you can set your scan options---this includes ADF use! What was HP thinking?!?
Slashdot Mirror
Our group evaluated a handful of workgroup tools: issue tracking, revision control, documentation. Trac was in the list, but it fell short on a number of points after we tried it for a simple project. We wanted SVN integration and liked Mantis, so we hooked in scmbug. It took a little tweaking to setup the 'products' in scmbug to meet our Mantis usage pattern, but it does the trick. Throw on your favorite wiki (mediawiki, twiki, moinmoin, etc.), and you are covered.
The jams with the ADF make it worthless, agreed. But the thing that makes even the flatbed nearly useless as well is the drivers. They are absolutley the worst pieces of software I have ever seen. The v2 drivers hose up the system (pc+scanner) so badly that they both have to be reset, and the v1.2 drivers force you to 'preview' everything once before you can set your scan options---this includes ADF use! What was HP thinking?!?
I wish I had never purchased this hunk of junk. ;(