UN best practices call for immediate public vote counting, securing the voting boxes with seals (during the vote and after) and clear voting boxes (to prevent the box starting the day half full).
If a side can rig the count/recount, it's over. That's true for any ballot type.
The ID requirement in UN best practices make it a non-starter in the USA. It's 'racist', or some other equally stupid claim.
To say nothing of finger marking, that would seriously fuck up the 'get out the vote' buses.
Own report is 20%, obviously not enough, no telling how deluded their job categorization is...Reading comprehension isn't something I'd be talking about, if I was you.
Funny how that's only a problem when the other side is in charge...
Once you're well and truly fucked, you should spend all the chumps will lend you, then hide the assets. That isn't what the US government is doing though, they're just pissing it away on bread and circuses (known as 'investing in the future' in DC).
Brief history of American water rights laws west of the Mississippi...dams and aqueducts are _much_ easier to blow up than build.
Many people died in the range wars that led to the current legal water rights system. Only ignorant children think they can come in centuries later and just 'fix it, make it fair.'
UN best election practices are not considered secure 'for reasons'.
They have been tested against some of the worlds best election cheaters, not always successfully, but generally successfully enough that all but 'true believers' know the election was a sham when it was (e.g. Venezuela).
We'd be better off if we adopted them, but that would make us racist, or something.
But yeah, good news, voter ID is coming, the legalities are all worked out. Just not in the state where it's really really needed (CA). But the founding fathers were smart, electoral college protects us from the shenanigans.
I would NEVER get on an elevator that had software controlled emergency brakes.
But good news, at least for now, they would be illegal as fuck.
BTW the most typical way to build safety critical software is not to prove it mathematically, rather to build 3 completely independant versions using best practices, then have those 3 vote on what to do.
They claim that's how they ended up with only a small fraction of ballots in 2016 (one district in Detroit). It's not a plausible story, but the Ds have to accept it. Cognitive dissonance in action.
Tell that to Detroit. Hint: That's not how it works in practice.
In practice: They go to recount the ballots, find only about 25% of the votes, quickly stop the recount and hushup. Two years later, they deny it happened.
Slashdot Mirror
UN best practices call for immediate public vote counting, securing the voting boxes with seals (during the vote and after) and clear voting boxes (to prevent the box starting the day half full).
If a side can rig the count/recount, it's over. That's true for any ballot type.
The ID requirement in UN best practices make it a non-starter in the USA. It's 'racist', or some other equally stupid claim.
To say nothing of finger marking, that would seriously fuck up the 'get out the vote' buses.
Own report is 20%, obviously not enough, no telling how deluded their job categorization is...Reading comprehension isn't something I'd be talking about, if I was you.
Funny how that's only a problem when the other side is in charge...
Once you're well and truly fucked, you should spend all the chumps will lend you, then hide the assets. That isn't what the US government is doing though, they're just pissing it away on bread and circuses (known as 'investing in the future' in DC).
That's just an admission I'm right.
Still no non corrupt explanation even offered.
And the Tribune is flaming left...the money is still green.
Brief history of American water rights laws west of the Mississippi...dams and aqueducts are _much_ easier to blow up than build.
Many people died in the range wars that led to the current legal water rights system. Only ignorant children think they can come in centuries later and just 'fix it, make it fair.'
UN best election practices are not considered secure 'for reasons'.
They have been tested against some of the worlds best election cheaters, not always successfully, but generally successfully enough that all but 'true believers' know the election was a sham when it was (e.g. Venezuela).
We'd be better off if we adopted them, but that would make us racist, or something.
You're saying it was the flaming liberal Tribune side that bribed the Clintons...certainly possible, but I'd still guess 'both'.
Still looking for a non corrupt explanation for the sudden drop in bribeflow into the Clinton global fund after she lost.
Anybody?
No doubt they had Hillary pre-bribed. Another unexpected win from 2016!
You send two resumes, or you put the long form skill list in 1 pt white on white in the margins.
You should have written a 'long form, machine readable' resume years ago. Just to be processed by HR morons, it needs to be a long list of keywords.
The alternative is to include the keyword list in the margins in 1 pt white on white text.
You realize that requirement is for '5 years successfully bullshitting skills not possessed'?
If you can't tell that kind of lie, you will be useless in a client facing role.
Do you want to know how I know you are not an 'HR pro'?
Elections are run at state level.
But yeah, good news, voter ID is coming, the legalities are all worked out. Just not in the state where it's really really needed (CA). But the founding fathers were smart, electoral college protects us from the shenanigans.
Finger marking will likely take a little longer.
I would NEVER get on an elevator that had software controlled emergency brakes.
But good news, at least for now, they would be illegal as fuck.
BTW the most typical way to build safety critical software is not to prove it mathematically, rather to build 3 completely independant versions using best practices, then have those 3 vote on what to do.
When? /. has never had any use for FA readers.
Grandma Sherman always said her granddad should have finished the job!
Because the Ds claim the UN best practices for elections are 'racist'.
Fair enough: Nobody with a functional brain...
I worked a 32 hour day once.
8 at a client's location in Sydney, 18 travelling (over the dateline), 6 in Sacramento. The accountants wanted to argue.
They claim that's how they ended up with only a small fraction of ballots in 2016 (one district in Detroit). It's not a plausible story, but the Ds have to accept it. Cognitive dissonance in action.
Tell that to Detroit. Hint: That's not how it works in practice.
In practice: They go to recount the ballots, find only about 25% of the votes, quickly stop the recount and hushup. Two years later, they deny it happened.
Much easier to just start the day with ballot boxes half full of pre filled out 'votes'.
I still say just adopt UN best practices for elections. But that would be racist or something (per the Ds).
Sauce for the goose...you supported the open crook...now live with it.