Slashdot Mirror


User: witz

witz's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
160
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 160

  1. Re:get over it already on Fred Moody on the Solow Paradox, MS · · Score: 1

    How do you know there aren't any in Linux? Or UX? Or FreeBSD? Or any other OS? You only know what's documented.

  2. Re:The Old Math on Fred Moody on the Solow Paradox, MS · · Score: 1

    Who said I lost 600 files a year? We do backups, the files are RESTORED.

  3. Re:I slept through Econ 101, he slept through Real on Fred Moody on the Solow Paradox, MS · · Score: 1

    No, our systems are ghosted and identical and just don't crash often. Users are instructed to call the helpdesk when they crashed (EVERY time). They're plain-jane IBM machines running Windows 95 (standard installs, policied so they can't install other apps that can cause crashes). Most of the crashes are due to hardware and the machines are promptly fixed.

    Maybe we're just lucky, but this is how I thought a network is supposed to be run.

  4. Re:get over it already on Fred Moody on the Solow Paradox, MS · · Score: 1

    The OS itself doesn't have memory leaks, that's just plain wrong. The OS used to, and they were patched. Poorly written applications do. Run away processes are easily killed with the "kill" application that can even kill system services.


  5. Re:Anybody besides AC's who love NT? on Fred Moody on the Solow Paradox, MS · · Score: 1

    When a good admin implements it with solid hardware, NT is very stable. How's that?


    -witz0r

  6. Re:They'll change their tune... on Free PCs and Alternative OSs · · Score: 1

    And no one uses Quattro Pro.

  7. Re:I slept through Econ 101, he slept through Real on Fred Moody on the Solow Paradox, MS · · Score: 1

    I handle about 1500 users here in our LAN. I get two requests a day to restore a file. Two.

    -witz0r

  8. Re:get over it already on Fred Moody on the Solow Paradox, MS · · Score: 1

    I've seen NT administrators set NT servers to run openGL screen savers. Then they wonder why they peg out and eat it.

  9. Re:get over it already on Fred Moody on the Solow Paradox, MS · · Score: 1

    Slashdotters often lament the intelligence of NT administrators as a whole, and I really don't fault them. I've seen what most are capable of, and that isn't much. I like to put myself above them in terms of capability, as I've admin'd everything from WFWG 3.11 to MacOS to FreeBSD. My machines don't crash, and if they do, I fix them. Isn't that what being an Administrator is about? If you can't do that job effectively...then look into another profession.

    -witz0r

  10. Re:get over it already on Fred Moody on the Solow Paradox, MS · · Score: 1

    1) The ODBC vulernability doesn't affect you if you're current on MDAC components. MDAC 2.1 or 2.5 beta avoid this issue completely.

    2) "30 odd flaws"? Care to list them all? I'm running NT 4.0 SP5 on an IBM laptop of all things, and it has never crashed once. And it's even running Novell Client32. Stay current on patches and drivers (just as you would in any other NOS) and there isn't a problem.

    3) A real administrator would fix machines that have to be rebooted weekly. The quality of a NOS is only as good as the administrator and the hardware.

    4) I have a home-built PII 450 sitting on my desk that's been running NT 4.0 ever since I put it together almost a year ago. It's crashed twice. Both times, I was running Unreal (yes, Unreal) in a window. And for some reason, I suspect that Unreal is the culprit in that one :)

    I'm not advocating. I'm simply setting you straight.