By quietly I actually meant it's been given very little coverage - this was a small article in the middle of a local paper.
And yes, I did RTFA before I posted it, that's *why* I posted it.
Actually the "quietly" was referring to this article being a very small piece in a local newspaper, with no other coverage anywhere of it being planned or implemented.
And yes, I did read the article before I submitted it.
What about the fact that Microsoft are saying that they're going to hold back the patches to the general public by upto a month ? Is microsoft already implementing a policy simmilar to this and we're just not aware ?
By quietly I actually meant it's been given very little coverage - this was a small article in the middle of a local paper. And yes, I did RTFA before I posted it, that's *why* I posted it.
On a related note, another Cambridgeshire school introduced fingerprint recognition for registration in 2004: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cambridgeshire/4056829.stm
Actually the "quietly" was referring to this article being a very small piece in a local newspaper, with no other coverage anywhere of it being planned or implemented. And yes, I did read the article before I submitted it.
Though it hasn't been implemented yet, this was already planned in the UK with TomTom and Vodafone teaming up. The Register has the article: http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/10/27/tomtom_cel lular_traffic_tech/
What about the fact that Microsoft are saying that they're going to hold back the patches to the general public by upto a month ? Is microsoft already implementing a policy simmilar to this and we're just not aware ?