Going specifically to the old legal definition, it specifically has this: to make (a church) a national or state institution I agree with that. It is why the people left England. The state run church is not biblical.
This was on-topic. I have no problem with this.
2 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,17 that the man of Godt may be competent, equipped for every good work.
Equipped for every good work. So, we should all turn to God in every thing we set forth to do, and do it with His wisdom and guidance. And that absolutely does include governing this nation.
Many here disagree and label these posts as Troll. I am not trolling. I am spreading truth as I am commanded to do. You can ridicule and mock me all you want. As a matter of fact, I thank you for it. I am sad you are following the path of destruction though, and I will pray for you all.
This, however, was an off-topic rider, and was what my last post was about in it's entirety.
That's great and all, but I'm puzzled as to what it has to do with my stating someone was applying a modern definition to a word in an work written when it had a different meaning - and was written in lawyer-speak at that.
Eg, it has nothing to do with it at all. I respect your beliefs... but I don't respect random off-topic posts.
That's kind of like breaking into a conversation about car engines with "Oh, by the way. Have you found the word of God?" Non-sequetor...
My point is that since it isn't written in the document itself the Powers That Be can choose to ignore it without really any recourse. They really should have been more cynical in their forward-thinking.
So.... in other words some things you compromise on (because it's easier and gets you somewhere with the morons), and others you just deal with it? (it being people being morons and refusing to believe fact)?
In other words, you got all tussy and repeated exactly what I said, but with more words?
I didn't ask why they tested with another gene - I asked why they chose one that would result in penicillin resistant bacteria.... and not something much more harmless.
You realize that every outbreak causes CNS damage? The virus is dormant in the CNS, and when there's an outbreak the virus is multiplying... this damaging the CNS tissue that it was inhabiting.
Yea well - unfortunately there are and always will be people who read it literally and ignore context. So, to be safe and ensure what you want is what actually happens, you have to spell it out exactly like you want, and not leave such specifics as asides or to be assumed.
Slashdot Mirror
I think you got the sign on the second mod wrong.
I think your frosty machine is broken. It's spewing diarrhea all over the floor, instead of delicious icy goodness.
That is lesser issue.
Lesser? It's a non-issue.
Going specifically to the old legal definition, it specifically has this:
to make (a church) a national or state institution
I agree with that. It is why the people left England. The state run church is not biblical.
This was on-topic. I have no problem with this.
2 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,17 that the man of Godt may be competent, equipped for every good work.
Equipped for every good work. So, we should all turn to God in every thing we set forth to do, and do it with His wisdom and guidance. And that absolutely does include governing this nation.
Many here disagree and label these posts as Troll. I am not trolling. I am spreading truth as I am commanded to do. You can ridicule and mock me all you want. As a matter of fact, I thank you for it. I am sad you are following the path of destruction though, and I will pray for you all.
This, however, was an off-topic rider, and was what my last post was about in it's entirety.
That's great and all, but I'm puzzled as to what it has to do with my stating someone was applying a modern definition to a word in an work written when it had a different meaning - and was written in lawyer-speak at that.
Eg, it has nothing to do with it at all. I respect your beliefs... but I don't respect random off-topic posts.
That's kind of like breaking into a conversation about car engines with "Oh, by the way. Have you found the word of God?" Non-sequetor...
Severely listing? The ship's done spun over completely by now.
... as they have been since the late 1800s. Fucking things need to die already.
For some reason, I find it amusing that there's a function to view a printable version of an article... featuring videos.
Criminal. People who stick "cyber" in front of things because the innerwebs are involved need to be slapped.
My point is that since it isn't written in the document itself the Powers That Be can choose to ignore it without really any recourse. They really should have been more cynical in their forward-thinking.
So.... in other words some things you compromise on (because it's easier and gets you somewhere with the morons), and others you just deal with it? (it being people being morons and refusing to believe fact)?
In other words, you got all tussy and repeated exactly what I said, but with more words?
I thought biological viruses was where "virii" is actually used? Huh.
Thanks for the explanation!
Aah, didn't make the connection with sausages. I tend to not eat sausages with skin/wrapper :)
Gah. Didn't load all of your comment for some reason. Ignore my other reply, please.
I didn't ask why they tested with another gene - I asked why they chose one that would result in penicillin resistant bacteria.... and not something much more harmless.
The idea was normal cells have dealt with this virus many times over, but the cancer cells forget what to do with it.
That can't be right... normal cells do not handle virii, that's the responsibility of specific immune cells.
So... where do you believe the virus lays dormant in? You realize that when a virus spreads it destroys the cell that had been manufacturing it?
Herpes is dormant in neural tissue. Tissue that is damaged every time it outbreaks.
You realize that every outbreak causes CNS damage? The virus is dormant in the CNS, and when there's an outbreak the virus is multiplying... this damaging the CNS tissue that it was inhabiting.
That kind of damage tends to be cumulative.
Yea well - unfortunately there are and always will be people who read it literally and ignore context. So, to be safe and ensure what you want is what actually happens, you have to spell it out exactly like you want, and not leave such specifics as asides or to be assumed.
If people understood that evolution does not actually work that way, "Intelligent Design" would be a completely moot point.
Unfortunately this is not going to happen... you have to work with what you have (eg compromise in some way (like what I said)) or just deal with it.
Silly citizen, gov't agents are above the law.
So, you follow people around explaining jokes as they happen?
It matters because the people who decide what matters agreed with it... not because it matters on it's own merit.
... can I play too?
I said I'm sorry! :D
Meh it's all dependent on your frame of reference and therefor not worth caring about.