cyanogenmod + enochx = much more visually appealing, many features added to your phone.
Rooting is not as complicated as it used to be - meanwhile, there are lots of sites out there on programming an android phone with great info, even google's.
The thing is, Eve can handle more players in their game, than Wow can on a single server. It's not so much about zones or solar systems in that sense. I guess I should have mentioned that it's sharded but for people who don't understand tech saying it's a server is easy enough for them to identify.
Meanwhile, eve handling more is both a feature and by design. I'm just trying to point out that games can only hold so much right now, and the capacity only goes so far.
I'm not sure if blizzard or eve's approach is more logical, but both seem to work for their approaches *decently* well.
no, vista is what you get if you want to use DX10 (likewise DX11 with windows 7) - it's being crammed down throats until wine or other equivalents can find a better way to get around it.
read the anon's post. Eve is the only game to be able to handle tons of people in one area. Wow horribly crashed during AQ opening...do you remember the >3000 MS pings during the event? That thing was beyond laggy both for the pc's and the servers.
population maximums (single server) Eve: ~45K players at once
Wow: ~8K players at once
Champions online: less.
Basically, nobody can handle the parallelism of eve, mostly because they actually had open instances within the cluster that people could go to (deadspace, missions, etc).
This creates way more social aspects than any other game, but gameplay itself has to be handled differently. Seriously, the social aspects of single server are a thousandfold greater.
an MMO with that many people, as smart as it would be to see companies do such a thing with their technology, would just crash at the idea of 500 people trying to kill the same rabbit for x quest. Only now is blizzard getting around it by letting people see their own live instancing of certain things (aka cataclysm at the same time as the barrens).
Technology takes time. Give it 10 years or so before this is fixed.
as someone says above, isn't notifying of possible infections a good thing? I mean enterprise supposedly has better ways to detect it than a normal consumer, especially since comcast in the ISP business?
Additionally, it's something that not only is good for consumers but good for comcast, assuming they don't use it as false positives to cut off bittorrent users (which I find unlikely to happen anyway).
Studies and studies and studies have been done which show that placement is important, and having IE in the middle here creates a bias. Basically people will just click center very commonly.
If they have something on the computer that prohibits installation it is their job to set it up. If not, you're not prevented from anything.
I've done exactly what you said tons of times. nothing happens. In fact, I even asked the librarian first as a matter of politeness and they didn't care.
eh? I was following this thread and I misread and followed the route of digishaman as well. I'm not defending him, just sometime people fail to read properly when multitasking, myself included.
ever heard the phrase a leopard can't change it's spots?
Well, MS is that leopard. Don't bet on them ever changing, because all they've ever done a thousand times over is say that they have, and then not change.
This by the way is stupid, because if they ever did change and support FOSS, people would support them in a heartbeat because they are so well known.
why would you need a 50 gig flash drive, or were we talking double sided only? BD-R are 25GB, which you can buy a 32GB on newegg for like $70 and it will play everywhere.
Basically, the technology doesn't really fit a purpose. It's just an interim waiting to be replaced. If flash drives keep getting more efficient as SSD represents, we might just not have a need for drives that require specific readers. I've heard bluray discs take a lifetime to burn and USB2 is no better (although USB3 will only be marginally better).
We're still on the verge of the solution for all of this crap and I don't see it being disc, flash or hard drive really.
well why the hell would you want to drag a BD-R for that? You can buy a flash drive for 15 or 20 bucks that holds more data and is a lot more portable and usable than the odd shape of a BD-R (and more durable) - since you need a BD-R reader to play a BD-R disc.
thank you. This is exactly what I was looking for. The discs are always behind on the tech, and I'm guessing maybe it's on purpose...maybe the companies want to phase it out for software licensing since then you can't "own" an irrevocable copy at this point? I know it seems somewhat tinfoil hat-ish but still.
Bluray also didn't take off because we had the HDDVD Bluray format war and the completely shit storage in the beginning. 50 GB 3 years ago is still a small amount. 50 GB today is an even smaller one. I can get flash drives with more space today.
the problem was the deliberate wording where they don't ask the question about if people like advertisements. They only asked if people wanted targeted advertisements.
Whether they are targeted or not, people don't give a rats ass, they just don't want them.
Meanwhile, who knows what kind of DRM will be put on this crap as it's supported by all your favorite media dinosaurs.
Can someone find the old slashdot article about petabyte holographic storage? I don't remember how far back it was, but talking about hundreds + layer holographic storage basically.
Slashdot Mirror
cyanogenmod + enochx = much more visually appealing, many features added to your phone.
Rooting is not as complicated as it used to be - meanwhile, there are lots of sites out there on programming an android phone with great info, even google's.
The thing is, Eve can handle more players in their game, than Wow can on a single server. It's not so much about zones or solar systems in that sense. I guess I should have mentioned that it's sharded but for people who don't understand tech saying it's a server is easy enough for them to identify.
Meanwhile, eve handling more is both a feature and by design. I'm just trying to point out that games can only hold so much right now, and the capacity only goes so far.
I'm not sure if blizzard or eve's approach is more logical, but both seem to work for their approaches *decently* well.
no, vista is what you get if you want to use DX10 (likewise DX11 with windows 7) - it's being crammed down throats until wine or other equivalents can find a better way to get around it.
most machines with 1.5GB run linux decently well.
Vista is "okay", after having to do 8 million steps to make it manageable.
read the anon's post. Eve is the only game to be able to handle tons of people in one area. Wow horribly crashed during AQ opening...do you remember the >3000 MS pings during the event? That thing was beyond laggy both for the pc's and the servers.
population maximums (single server)
Eve: ~45K players at once
Wow: ~8K players at once
Champions online: less.
Basically, nobody can handle the parallelism of eve, mostly because they actually had open instances within the cluster that people could go to (deadspace, missions, etc).
This creates way more social aspects than any other game, but gameplay itself has to be handled differently. Seriously, the social aspects of single server are a thousandfold greater.
an MMO with that many people, as smart as it would be to see companies do such a thing with their technology, would just crash at the idea of 500 people trying to kill the same rabbit for x quest. Only now is blizzard getting around it by letting people see their own live instancing of certain things (aka cataclysm at the same time as the barrens).
Technology takes time. Give it 10 years or so before this is fixed.
because itunes is a piece of crap whether you buy music through them or not?
there are lots of services way better.
Oh, and the G1 can do itunes.
is the fact that they removed the publishers name actually criminal?
as someone says above, isn't notifying of possible infections a good thing? I mean enterprise supposedly has better ways to detect it than a normal consumer, especially since comcast in the ISP business?
Additionally, it's something that not only is good for consumers but good for comcast, assuming they don't use it as false positives to cut off bittorrent users (which I find unlikely to happen anyway).
so simple, yet I bet they would balk at the idea.
I read that. I wonder if there was a better method or something that could said that would remain impartial.
don't forget the bias.
Studies and studies and studies have been done which show that placement is important, and having IE in the middle here creates a bias. Basically people will just click center very commonly.
Jah is correct and you are wrong here.
If they have something on the computer that prohibits installation it is their job to set it up. If not, you're not prevented from anything.
I've done exactly what you said tons of times. nothing happens. In fact, I even asked the librarian first as a matter of politeness and they didn't care.
eh? I was following this thread and I misread and followed the route of digishaman as well. I'm not defending him, just sometime people fail to read properly when multitasking, myself included.
uh, article showed that temperature has nothing to do with it.
the rest is accurate.
ever heard the phrase a leopard can't change it's spots?
Well, MS is that leopard. Don't bet on them ever changing, because all they've ever done a thousand times over is say that they have, and then not change.
This by the way is stupid, because if they ever did change and support FOSS, people would support them in a heartbeat because they are so well known.
why would you need a 50 gig flash drive, or were we talking double sided only? BD-R are 25GB, which you can buy a 32GB on newegg for like $70 and it will play everywhere.
Basically, the technology doesn't really fit a purpose. It's just an interim waiting to be replaced. If flash drives keep getting more efficient as SSD represents, we might just not have a need for drives that require specific readers. I've heard bluray discs take a lifetime to burn and USB2 is no better (although USB3 will only be marginally better).
We're still on the verge of the solution for all of this crap and I don't see it being disc, flash or hard drive really.
well why the hell would you want to drag a BD-R for that? You can buy a flash drive for 15 or 20 bucks that holds more data and is a lot more portable and usable than the odd shape of a BD-R (and more durable) - since you need a BD-R reader to play a BD-R disc.
they don't reliably deliver mail.
They're the only ones who deliver IBM brand DRM in the form of onerous document control/locking/deletion. This is why enterprise likes it.
Meanwhile, it's a turd of a program and our workplace is thankfully moving to allow Thunderbird soon.
we can play bluray without DRM. It's called Matroska/H264/Theora.
thank you. This is exactly what I was looking for. The discs are always behind on the tech, and I'm guessing maybe it's on purpose...maybe the companies want to phase it out for software licensing since then you can't "own" an irrevocable copy at this point? I know it seems somewhat tinfoil hat-ish but still.
Bluray also didn't take off because we had the HDDVD Bluray format war and the completely shit storage in the beginning. 50 GB 3 years ago is still a small amount. 50 GB today is an even smaller one. I can get flash drives with more space today.
maybe you don't understand?
in the concept of the phrase, hard drive = optical drive (in a casing).
There's no reason you should be unable to have terminator 1-5 on a single disc other than bad calls by the industry for discs.
the problem was the deliberate wording where they don't ask the question about if people like advertisements. They only asked if people wanted targeted advertisements.
Whether they are targeted or not, people don't give a rats ass, they just don't want them.
This is actually Bluray 1.0. There were experiments being done involving multi layer discs way before bluray. Sony is the one who dictated the 50GB size for the discs for consumers (25GB for data). Bluray discs themselves can hit considerably higher.
Meanwhile, who knows what kind of DRM will be put on this crap as it's supported by all your favorite media dinosaurs.
Can someone find the old slashdot article about petabyte holographic storage? I don't remember how far back it was, but talking about hundreds + layer holographic storage basically.
Right, and that is supposed to be the same across all cellphone providers?
GPS is *always* blocked by trees. Cellphone service is provider specific.
who says you're not going to have areas where you don't have a GPS signal but do have cell reception, inversely?
Trees are not exactly GPS friendly, you know.