Perhaps Google, YOU, and all the others here crying 'the picture is racist') are actually being racist. Google has an automated way of ranking pages. Clearly the picture met that criteria. The only reason any alteration was made was because Michelle Obama is black and influential. I did the search on 'Michelle Obama Monkey' as you suggested, and what came up on the first page as number 8? George W. Bush's face pasted on a monkey. Heck, 2 of the top 10 pictures for the Michelle search were Bush as a monkey.
As much as I dislike Bush, I believe his intelligence was closer to a monkey, and he does have a simian brow, it is less relevant for a monkey picture of George Bush to show up when searching for 'Michelle Obama Monkey', than for a monkey picture of Michelle Obama to show up when searching for 'Michelle Obama'.
In fact, if you do an image search on 'Michelle Obama Monkey' and 'George W Bush Monkey', you come up with 15 pictures of George W Bush combined with monkeys. For Michelle Obama, you get only 4 images of Michelle Obama combined with monkeys. You get 5 with Barak Obama combined with monkeys. (one is with both of them) That is only 8 images of the Obama presidency combined with Monkeys compared to Bush's 15. Here is the kicker... The 'Michelle Obama Monkey' search produces 2 pictures of George W Bush combined with a monkey!
So, it is clear that if there was any racism on Google's part, it would against white people and for black people. Given what Google has now admitted to doing, there is no question that they are now acting in a racist manner.
His wrongness was obviously powered by the the massive wind generated by my sarcasm flying over your head. That's what the "Whoosh" sound you heard was.
You missed the part where they want us all to live in tightly packed urban environments, and the 'subsistence sustainable vegetable' farms are what you can grow in your window box.
Well, that explains the barrier to adoption of Linux. Apparently, if you want to get to the gspot, you need to bring in a bunch of gnomes. I'm a liberal guy and all, but even I don't think that bringing in gnomes should be a REQUIREMENT for the gspot.
You keep saying things that make your wife look incompetent. I would be pissed if I were her. Either you exposing her incompetence, or you are spreading false rumeors about her. If the teachers you have can't get as good of a deal as a new hire teacher, and every person that applies gets hired, then either you are lieing or your wife isn't smart enough to quit and just reapply at a higher salary. If you are not lying, and she isn't smart enough to figure out how to up her salary, then she isn't smart enough to be a competent teacher, which I have to admit, would prove your point about anyone who wants to teach getting a job.
No, your wife does NOT deserve to earn above avarage wages. The fact that she either made poor choices on what education was necessary for her field, or she just decided to go to school for her own enrichment, does not mean she deserves extra pay any more than a Walmart manager with a masters degree deserves some huge pay increase.
If your wife is working as much as you claim, then she is incompetent. I have known many teachers personally over the years, and not one. That's right, not one has even come close to your claims on the required hours. Perhaps you should be asking why your wife requires almost twice as much time to accomplish the same job as her peers. Maybe you can also ask her why complaining that teachers salaries (which means nationally) are low by using SC as an example when the national average is in the top half of earners, is bad math. With 7 years of collage and a masters degree, it should be trivial for her to figure it out for you.
According to AFTTEACHERS make an avarage of $50k a year. This puts TEACHERS in the top half of our nations earners. That makes their pay average at worst. When you factor in the three months vacation a year that they get, their hourly rate makes them paid quite well.
So, no, evil adminstrators do not explain how every single teacher makes less than the average teacher salary.
How is it that every single teacher makes less than the average wage of a public school teacher? Based on the anecdotale evidence, there must be some tiny secret group of public school teachers that make several hundred thousand dollars a year.
Are you claiming that the human body has a fixed number of nerve endings? So, are you saying that Matt Roloff is going to be twice as sensative on every part of his body than Michael Jordan? Really?
The claim that the number of nerve endings in humans is fixed irrelevent of size, or even amongst people of the same size is highly dubious, and certainly needs some sort of citation.
That is just wrong. He claims not to feel an friction, and does not have any feeling that is not on the surface. Neither of these would have been effected by an excessively tight circumcision. Also, skin streatches, so masterbation would resolve an excessively tight circumcision.
The medical reason is exactly the same as for immunizations. It is preventative. Would you absolutly have a medical problem if you didn't have the procedure? No. Can it prevent medical problems? Yes. Do you know ahead of time whether your child will be effected or not? No.
Take the flu vaccine for example. How many kids have a needle stabbed into their bodies, and disease injected when they were not going to get the flu anyway, and even if they did, it would just be a minor inconvenience. Or worse yet, the chicken pox vaccine, where it may actually INCRESE the chances of medical problems for the kid so that the parents and the schools can make a few extra bucks. Even the polio vaccine, had no "medical reason" for most children. I happen to think the pay off is worth it for the polio vaccine, but I am absolutly aware that I agreed to have my child injected because otherwise he MIGHT have a bigger problem.
Making the claim that circumcision is wrong, while immunization is right is hypocritical. What the 'right' risks and actions to take with our own children is not a black and white issue. It is a shades of grey. Immunization and circumcision are awfully close in the grey scale.
Actually it is not a dig on vaccination. It is a dig against people who make statements condeming parents for making health decisions for their kids, and base the condemnation on hyperbole and sound bites. But, since the rest of your post is just the parroting of dogma, it doesn't suprise me that you didn't catch anything that didn't match up with your pre-defined stereotypes.
Don't leave out the option of hiring the person who appreciates having mom and dad pay for them to avoid getting a job and drink heavily for 4 years. (No, this is not every collage grad, but it is a lot of them.)
I wouldn't say that it is on purpose so much as public school has become a business. BIG business. Schools are run with the goal of getting the biggest piece possible of the very large amount of money allocated to "education".
You've been conned by sound bites. Neither rubbing against clothing, nor the removal of nerve ending at the end of the shaft will keep you from feeling the rest of your penis, including the nerve ending that are on the inside of your penis, which is what you are claiming. While the claim of less feeling on the head is theoretically possible, even if extreamly unlikely, the fact that the rest of your penis has no feeling makes your claim sounds more like wanting a scape goat for an unfortunate genetic trait.
That is very unfortunate for you. Although, I'm not sure if you are arguing that circumcision doesn't matter because you can't feel your penis anyway, or if you are blaming circumcision for the lack of feeling in the rest of your penis.
Yeah, she saw an picture that looked like a movie. It's the same way that my son would launch movies on his Ubuntu PC when he was one year old. This isn't an example of Apple having unusually good UI. It is an example of Apple using a user interface that has been widely deployed since the 80s.
As a matter of fact, I can. Humans simply cannot process all of their nerve endings at once. Your kind of sound bite could also be use to claim that big penises obviously feel better than small ones. After all, you can't tell me that an extra two inches of penis with nerve endings has no effect.
destruction of a healthy part of a childs body, without the proper justification that is required for amputation, a serious or life threatening disease requiring immediate treatment which is present and current and cannot be treated by lesser invasive means
So, I take it you have ethical problems with haircuts too then?
Well, maybe you could start by getting the practice of forcibly tearing holes in the ears of children who did not agree to have their ears pierced, and work your way up. Then after you get circumcision outlawed, you can work on getting the practice of forcibly puncturing holes into the arms and legs of children who did not agree for the purpose of injecting diseases into them.
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps Google, YOU, and all the others here crying 'the picture is racist') are actually being racist. Google has an automated way of ranking pages. Clearly the picture met that criteria. The only reason any alteration was made was because Michelle Obama is black and influential. I did the search on 'Michelle Obama Monkey' as you suggested, and what came up on the first page as number 8? George W. Bush's face pasted on a monkey. Heck, 2 of the top 10 pictures for the Michelle search were Bush as a monkey.
As much as I dislike Bush, I believe his intelligence was closer to a monkey, and he does have a simian brow, it is less relevant for a monkey picture of George Bush to show up when searching for 'Michelle Obama Monkey', than for a monkey picture of Michelle Obama to show up when searching for 'Michelle Obama'.
In fact, if you do an image search on 'Michelle Obama Monkey' and 'George W Bush Monkey', you come up with 15 pictures of George W Bush combined with monkeys. For Michelle Obama, you get only 4 images of Michelle Obama combined with monkeys. You get 5 with Barak Obama combined with monkeys. (one is with both of them) That is only 8 images of the Obama presidency combined with Monkeys compared to Bush's 15. Here is the kicker... The 'Michelle Obama Monkey' search produces 2 pictures of George W Bush combined with a monkey!
So, it is clear that if there was any racism on Google's part, it would against white people and for black people. Given what Google has now admitted to doing, there is no question that they are now acting in a racist manner.
His wrongness was obviously powered by the the massive wind generated by my sarcasm flying over your head. That's what the "Whoosh" sound you heard was.
Obviously your wrong because of the law of thermodynamics.
You missed the part where they want us all to live in tightly packed urban environments, and the 'subsistence sustainable vegetable' farms are what you can grow in your window box.
So, throw in the VCR and we had it at least by the 80's
Well, that explains the barrier to adoption of Linux. Apparently, if you want to get to the gspot, you need to bring in a bunch of gnomes. I'm a liberal guy and all, but even I don't think that bringing in gnomes should be a REQUIREMENT for the gspot.
Oh how I wish that were true...
Or in as in the case of many projects I have been subject to, Scope LEAP.
You keep saying things that make your wife look incompetent. I would be pissed if I were her. Either you exposing her incompetence, or you are spreading false rumeors about her. If the teachers you have can't get as good of a deal as a new hire teacher, and every person that applies gets hired, then either you are lieing or your wife isn't smart enough to quit and just reapply at a higher salary. If you are not lying, and she isn't smart enough to figure out how to up her salary, then she isn't smart enough to be a competent teacher, which I have to admit, would prove your point about anyone who wants to teach getting a job.
No, your wife does NOT deserve to earn above avarage wages. The fact that she either made poor choices on what education was necessary for her field, or she just decided to go to school for her own enrichment, does not mean she deserves extra pay any more than a Walmart manager with a masters degree deserves some huge pay increase.
If your wife is working as much as you claim, then she is incompetent. I have known many teachers personally over the years, and not one. That's right, not one has even come close to your claims on the required hours. Perhaps you should be asking why your wife requires almost twice as much time to accomplish the same job as her peers. Maybe you can also ask her why complaining that teachers salaries (which means nationally) are low by using SC as an example when the national average is in the top half of earners, is bad math. With 7 years of collage and a masters degree, it should be trivial for her to figure it out for you.
According to AFTTEACHERS make an avarage of $50k a year. This puts TEACHERS in the top half of our nations earners. That makes their pay average at worst. When you factor in the three months vacation a year that they get, their hourly rate makes them paid quite well.
So, no, evil adminstrators do not explain how every single teacher makes less than the average teacher salary.
How is it that every single teacher makes less than the average wage of a public school teacher? Based on the anecdotale evidence, there must be some tiny secret group of public school teachers that make several hundred thousand dollars a year.
Are you claiming that the human body has a fixed number of nerve endings? So, are you saying that Matt Roloff is going to be twice as sensative on every part of his body than Michael Jordan? Really?
The claim that the number of nerve endings in humans is fixed irrelevent of size, or even amongst people of the same size is highly dubious, and certainly needs some sort of citation.
That is just wrong. He claims not to feel an friction, and does not have any feeling that is not on the surface. Neither of these would have been effected by an excessively tight circumcision. Also, skin streatches, so masterbation would resolve an excessively tight circumcision.
The medical reason is exactly the same as for immunizations. It is preventative. Would you absolutly have a medical problem if you didn't have the procedure? No. Can it prevent medical problems? Yes. Do you know ahead of time whether your child will be effected or not? No.
Take the flu vaccine for example. How many kids have a needle stabbed into their bodies, and disease injected when they were not going to get the flu anyway, and even if they did, it would just be a minor inconvenience. Or worse yet, the chicken pox vaccine, where it may actually INCRESE the chances of medical problems for the kid so that the parents and the schools can make a few extra bucks. Even the polio vaccine, had no "medical reason" for most children. I happen to think the pay off is worth it for the polio vaccine, but I am absolutly aware that I agreed to have my child injected because otherwise he MIGHT have a bigger problem.
Making the claim that circumcision is wrong, while immunization is right is hypocritical. What the 'right' risks and actions to take with our own children is not a black and white issue. It is a shades of grey. Immunization and circumcision are awfully close in the grey scale.
Schools wanting ENOUGH money to educate students is not evil. Schools willing to sacrifice the well being of students to increase profits IS evil.
Actually it is not a dig on vaccination. It is a dig against people who make statements condeming parents for making health decisions for their kids, and base the condemnation on hyperbole and sound bites. But, since the rest of your post is just the parroting of dogma, it doesn't suprise me that you didn't catch anything that didn't match up with your pre-defined stereotypes.
Don't leave out the option of hiring the person who appreciates having mom and dad pay for them to avoid getting a job and drink heavily for 4 years. (No, this is not every collage grad, but it is a lot of them.)
I wouldn't say that it is on purpose so much as public school has become a business. BIG business. Schools are run with the goal of getting the biggest piece possible of the very large amount of money allocated to "education".
You've been conned by sound bites. Neither rubbing against clothing, nor the removal of nerve ending at the end of the shaft will keep you from feeling the rest of your penis, including the nerve ending that are on the inside of your penis, which is what you are claiming. While the claim of less feeling on the head is theoretically possible, even if extreamly unlikely, the fact that the rest of your penis has no feeling makes your claim sounds more like wanting a scape goat for an unfortunate genetic trait.
That is very unfortunate for you. Although, I'm not sure if you are arguing that circumcision doesn't matter because you can't feel your penis anyway, or if you are blaming circumcision for the lack of feeling in the rest of your penis.
Yeah, she saw an picture that looked like a movie. It's the same way that my son would launch movies on his Ubuntu PC when he was one year old. This isn't an example of Apple having unusually good UI. It is an example of Apple using a user interface that has been widely deployed since the 80s.
As a matter of fact, I can. Humans simply cannot process all of their nerve endings at once. Your kind of sound bite could also be use to claim that big penises obviously feel better than small ones. After all, you can't tell me that an extra two inches of penis with nerve endings has no effect.
destruction of a healthy part of a childs body, without the proper justification that is required for amputation, a serious or life threatening disease requiring immediate treatment which is present and current and cannot be treated by lesser invasive means
So, I take it you have ethical problems with haircuts too then?
Well, maybe you could start by getting the practice of forcibly tearing holes in the ears of children who did not agree to have their ears pierced, and work your way up. Then after you get circumcision outlawed, you can work on getting the practice of forcibly puncturing holes into the arms and legs of children who did not agree for the purpose of injecting diseases into them.