Yeah, it was kind of a joke. And, the larger the number of bits the more 'secure' it is, KIND OF...
I am going to check how long it takes to compute.
"Completed in 0.0039598941802979 seconds"
Doesn't seem that heavy... Sure, it is a large amount heavier then JUST using md5 or sha1..
Once they can break this:
SuperD5/SHA Encryption Combo
(crap, I am going to slashdot my own site:D)
I will be impressed.
I admit, it is hardly feasible, here is my code for those who are interested:)
Yeah, it was kind of a joke. And, the larger the number of bits the more 'secure' it is, KIND OF... I am going to check how long it takes to compute. "Completed in 0.0039598941802979 seconds" Doesn't seem that heavy... Sure, it is a large amount heavier then JUST using md5 or sha1..
Btw, with the code, you can now break it if you can break MD5 and SHA1, but without it, it would be almost impossible.