Clinton is no longer a government employee, and probably doesn't care if she ever has a clearance again
No, she doesn't need security clearance, she's just going to be the fucking president of the United States. Thornley, you are the biggest and dumbest Hillary shill on earth.
"Lying under oath" is more commonly referred to as "perjury", and perjury is a felony. The laws regarding perjury make no distinction regarding what the perjury is about. As a lawyer, Clinton knew that.
If Hillary Clinton had been a young male programmer who implemented a skunkwork hack to be able to BYOD so he could work more efficiently and not have to use the IT departments bad solution.
She wasn't. She was the fucking Secretary of State.
So a high federal official that lets foreign governments have access to Top Secret documents isn't committing criminal negligence? Sure looks like it to me.
And that 15 year old Toyota? Less of an option if you live in a snow belt state where salt gets applied to the roads. Cars don't last as long up north.
I live in Canada and bought a new Toyota in 1983. I drove it until 2002.
I sold it because it had transmission problems - no rust at all.
If you buy crap cars. The point of diminishing returns is more like 16 years for a Honda. My son's 18 year old Honda CRV (290K on the odometer) runs fine and he pays about $400 a year for non-routine maintenance.
I bought an '03 Honda Pilot in '08 with 180K on it. It now has more than 300K.
I have put maybe $400-$600 a year into servicing (apart from constants like oil changes, new tires every 4 years, etc). If you are paying a lot more than that, then:
1. improve your yearly maintenance
2. buy a Honda
However, it can swerve left or swerve right. One direction means a head-on collision, the other means mowing down a dozen pedestrians
Simple:
1. never swerve into a lane that isn't empty.
2. never break traffic laws, Therefore, swerving into an oncoming lane, or a sidewalk, is forbidden.
This means that on a two-lane road, the only option is to brake like hell. If that kills or injures someone, too bad.
I don't believe this issue will ever come up.
Instead, if the vehicle senses an obstacle ahead (any obstacle) it will check to see if there is an open lane to the right or left. If so, it will swerve into that lane. Otherwise, it will hit the brakes as hard as it can and hope for the best.
This way, the decision of what to do becomes purely mechanical. Having the vehicle make decisions regarding the probable long-term results of the action is foolish.
Slashdot Mirror
Clinton is no longer a government employee, and probably doesn't care if she ever has a clearance again
No, she doesn't need security clearance, she's just going to be the fucking president of the United States.
Thornley, you are the biggest and dumbest Hillary shill on earth.
He lied under oath about ...
"Lying under oath" is more commonly referred to as "perjury", and perjury is a felony.
The laws regarding perjury make no distinction regarding what the perjury is about.
As a lawyer, Clinton knew that.
but it is equally valid to say Hillary gets investigated over it when nobody else does.
Anybody with Top Secret clearance would be investigated, and likely sanctioned for putting secret documents sit on an unsecured server.
If Hillary Clinton had been a young male programmer who implemented a skunkwork hack to be able to BYOD so he could work more efficiently and not have to use the IT departments bad solution.
She wasn't. She was the fucking Secretary of State.
Clinton's conduct, while reprehensible, turns out not to have been criminal.
Clearly not true.
anyone who did what she did would not have committed a crime (partly by luck).
Criminal negligence with regards to national security is determined by behavior, not luck
She didn't actually leak it (I think she lucked out on that one),
And nobody but you believes this.
Clinton was sloppy, and apparently managed not to leak classified information anyway.
Where the fuck do you get this from?
Clinton apparently didn't (partly by luck) leak classified information.
Where do you get that from? How would anybody know if the server had been accessed by a foreign power?
Clinton was essentially the CEO of the State Department.
That does not put her above the law.
If you are a CEO you can leak your product's release date.
Yeah, but the CEO isn't committing a federal offense when he does that.
HRC was.
negligence is criminal when it results in a leak of classified material, which apparently didn't happen
And what do you base that assumption on?
The FBI couldn't find that her sloppy handling of classified material had actually allowed a leak.
And if foreign enemy governments had accessed classified U.S. documents from Hillary's server, do you think they would admit it?
But laws on espionage require more then just intent to violate the law
Nobody is accusing her of espionage - just criminal negligence with regard to the handling of classified documents.
If someone emails YOU classified material, is it automatically your fault?
Yes, if you store it in a way that contravenes the rules for secure communications.
Anything with elephants inside repeated this often reeks of a double standard upwind, from 50 meters.
Speak English much?
Bernie Sanders would become the Dem nominee if Hillary were indicted.
How would that constitute "election tampering"?
So a high federal official that lets foreign governments have access to Top Secret documents isn't committing criminal negligence?
Sure looks like it to me.
And that 15 year old Toyota? Less of an option if you live in a snow belt state where salt gets applied to the roads. Cars don't last as long up north.
I live in Canada and bought a new Toyota in 1983. I drove it until 2002.
I sold it because it had transmission problems - no rust at all.
You're at the point of diminishing returns by 6.
If you buy crap cars. The point of diminishing returns is more like 16 years for a Honda.
My son's 18 year old Honda CRV (290K on the odometer) runs fine and he pays about $400 a year for non-routine maintenance.
Yeah, repairs and maintenance are nearer $20/month for my cat, although another $200 for the annual checkup.
Why? After its spayed/neutered, what else do you have to pay for?
I bought an '03 Honda Pilot in '08 with 180K on it. It now has more than 300K.
I have put maybe $400-$600 a year into servicing (apart from constants like oil changes, new tires every 4 years, etc).
If you are paying a lot more than that, then:
1. improve your yearly maintenance
2. buy a Honda
However, it can swerve left or swerve right. One direction means a head-on collision, the other means mowing down a dozen pedestrians
Simple:
1. never swerve into a lane that isn't empty.
2. never break traffic laws, Therefore, swerving into an oncoming lane, or a sidewalk, is forbidden.
This means that on a two-lane road, the only option is to brake like hell. If that kills or injures someone, too bad.
Make the best of it and decide who gets killed, injured, maimed or saved - Yourself, the pedestrian, another driver?
Always protect the occupants of the vehicle. There's no time to do otherwise.
I don't believe this issue will ever come up.
Instead, if the vehicle senses an obstacle ahead (any obstacle)
it will check to see if there is an open lane to the right or left.
If so, it will swerve into that lane.
Otherwise, it will hit the brakes as hard as it can and hope for the best.
This way, the decision of what to do becomes purely mechanical.
Having the vehicle make decisions regarding the probable long-term results of the action is foolish.