That's what you get from reading huge books on computer screens. Especially green ones with black print.
Horrible idea, at least until they start making lightweight (less than half a pound), book-sized Star Trek PADDs with refresh rates of at least 1Mhz.:)
First off, what was really interesting is that more people were interested in developing for GTK+ than for QT, but at the same time, more people wanted to develop for KDE than for GNOME. Maybe KDE should adopt GTK+ as their library.:)
I was also surprised at the popularity of Delphi. But I have to admit that when it comes to RAD, Delphi is RADer than any other C++ tool.:) And Rapid Application Development really seemed to be an interest in most of those polled.
RAD for Linux means more applications. Means more acceptance. Means Linux takes over the world!
One word: headache.
:)
That's what you get from reading huge books on computer screens. Especially green ones with black print.
Horrible idea, at least until they start making lightweight (less than half a pound), book-sized Star Trek PADDs with refresh rates of at least 1Mhz.
First off, what was really interesting is that more people were interested in developing for GTK+ than for QT, but at the same time, more people wanted to develop for KDE than for GNOME. Maybe KDE should adopt GTK+ as their library. :)
:) And Rapid Application Development really seemed to be an interest in most of those polled.
I was also surprised at the popularity of Delphi. But I have to admit that when it comes to RAD, Delphi is RADer than any other C++ tool.