Interesting paper, lots of correct english terms for balancing power.
Never heard about "Time Control" and as the/. article is about the fact that we lost 5minutes in Europe, we obviously don't to time control.
Because the grid frequency is supposed to be 50 or 60Hz, and it is run by engineers who take pride in their work. And what has that to do with the topic?
According to this: http://www.netzfrequenzmessung... Europe lost between 2011 and 2017 5minutes, and are partly trying to reverse that process, for what ever reason, and try to regain that "lost grid time". But we obviously have no regulations for this so far. So no, we only have primary to tertiary balancing power and no "time control" in europe. But we still have water closets, in case you are frightened now...:P
In Glasgow 2 fridges come to power, they let the frequency drop by a fraction of a Hz until the grid balances out. In London, at the exact same time, 2 fridges stop freezing and snooze. They let the frequency increase by a fraction of 1 Hz.
Obviously you have at both points at that moment different frequencies. Only for a fraction of a second, though.
So: they are obviously not talking about the grid frequency itself but some other effect which is related to it but don't say what that effect is.
A quartz crystal has excellent short-term accuracy, but lousy long-term accuracy. And you don't grasp that his statement makes no sense?
because the power companies handle all of the necessary corrections. No. Power companies make no "corrections". They attempt to keep the grid frequency _stable_ If the grid was below desired frequency in the morning, because of people suck unexpected more power, they do nothing in the evening to compensate for that. Why would they?
Yeah, there was that story, and I debunked it that time already. No one prevents you to put any background hum for a date in the past into your recording, assuming you know the correct hum.
And the hum varies on location. On top of that it would require some "authority" to record all relevant "back ground hums" on all "interesting locations".
Point is: in christian religion there is no moral point that nudity is immoral.
And the old testament is not christian religion, it is a reference book about what christians are not: e.g. christians prefer forgiveness over revenge.
You citing old testament but don't know that is for christians more or less irrelevant. It is a collection of historical events, e.g. Moses flight from Egypt or the conquest by Babylon, and law and health rules and other events, "suggestions".
The Old Testament consists of many distinct books by various authors produced over a period of centuries.[4] Christians traditionally divide the Old Testament into four sections: (1) the first five books or Pentateuch (Torah); (2) the history books telling the history of the Israelites, from their conquest of Canaan to their defeat and exile in Babylon; (3) the poetic and "Wisdom books" dealing, in various forms, with questions of good and evil in the world; and (4) the books of the biblical prophets, warning of the consequences of turning away from God.
Anyway, I have no problem with christians as long as they don't impose their self invented personal moral views on the rest of the world.
A friend of mine always says: all the evil on the world coms from the monotheistic religions (and this focuses on the three main ones).
Anyway, pray and live in peace!
P.S. look up the christian translation of the Indian greeting "Namaste" or the Thai version "Sawadee Khrap". Hint: it is wrong. And there is a reason why it is wrong. So sad...
GP doesn't know what he's talking about Actually I do. And so would you if you ever had taken a law class or watch european press about companies trying to TOSs rules down the throat of their "customers".
The legal age for accessing porn is 18, so no, you can not raise it to 21. No idea why you think you could. What is next? A Bank with online banking that restricts access to people above 21? Either banks and porn hubs are considered equal under law or not. You can not have one one way and the other one the other way.
Nonsense like this you can do in a house where you are the host and a nice law wich has nothing to do with age, says: the owner of the house can decide who he lets in.
And then again: a bank can not do that, and a pub/bar/club is on the borderline of illegal if he tries this. Many do that nevertheless...
And you can not TOSs out people out of a grosery store either, because they do not fit your definition of age.
That is funny, becuae if you written an efficent traveling salesmen algorithm you had solved the P=NP question. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
Im pretty sure you can not write a program that figures if I have written an infinite loop. And: there is no solution to the halting problem. No one evver asked to solve it. It is an axiom, like there infinite natural numbers..and funnily half of them are odd, the other half is even... which indicates you could divide infinity into two halfs, both half as big as infinity... no?
Of course they can have _stricter_ rules. Depending on the laws anyway. E.g. if the law says a 10 year old can use certain web sites, they can not raise it to 13. But a TOS alowing them to read messages is against telecomunication laws. So: how would younmake it more strict? By writing into the TOS parents may not read messages of children over age X? Sorry, can't do that.
You as a person, may not read my message. But if you let your dog sniff at the envelop and it barks, you put a stamp on it saying 'suspicious', that would be legal.
If automated scanning of mails/messages is legal or illegal is a matter of the country. I have no idea if it is illegal in the EU. But if you hired enough people to actually read the messages, or even read the message after an automated system flagged them: that would be illegal.
I did mot say they have to allow any post that does not be in conflict with the law. I said law is above tos, they can not restrict freedoms of customers based on a tos when the law says otherwise.
Why you are such an idiot noot to grasp that is beyond me.
The question here btw. is not about posts - which are somewhat public - but about messages, which are protecccted by privacy and secrecy laws. Go figure...
Oh man, you did not read the summary or the articfle? only watched a movie while being distracted on another web site?
It is so super simple that I wonder why no one else had that idea before.
A developers commits a piece of code to the source repository. Lets call that 'A' Later there is a bug found, which is in the issue tracker. Some guy fixes it.
Now we have a ticket in the issue tracker connected to the source code repository: to the fix and thus also connected to the bug.
Call that a rule or a hint. Or: a pattern.
When ever a developer tries to commit code, the commit hook, aka the AI, checks the repository for patters that look similar to 'A' and sets a warning that it might be buggy, because something similar like 'A' was fixed before.
The clue is to analyze the changed code, based on tickets that got fixed.
No, it is not a static code analyzer. You seem to old to grasp new concepts. Why don't you read the article instead of continuing to make an idiot out of your self?
It's their TOS, and as a member, they don't need a court order to read your messages. Regardless of TOS they are not allowed to read the messages at all. Even automated scanning for any purpose is on the edge to be illegal. No idea why here are so many idiots who think a TOS has more weight then the law has. Regarding the curt order: a court can order them to hand over messages, but not allow them to read them.
Slashdot Mirror
Interesting paper, lots of correct english terms for balancing power.
Never heard about "Time Control" and as the /. article is about the fact that we lost 5minutes in Europe, we obviously don't to time control.
Because the grid frequency is supposed to be 50 or 60Hz, and it is run by engineers who take pride in their work.
And what has that to do with the topic?
According to this: http://www.netzfrequenzmessung... Europe lost between 2011 and 2017 5minutes, and are partly trying to reverse that process, for what ever reason, and try to regain that "lost grid time". But we obviously have no regulations for this so far. So no, we only have primary to tertiary balancing power and no "time control" in europe. But we still have water closets, in case you are frightened now ... :P
The article is unfortunately very low on details.
Lets assume we have a grid frequency of 50Hz.
In Glasgow 2 fridges come to power, they let the frequency drop by a fraction of a Hz until the grid balances out.
In London, at the exact same time, 2 fridges stop freezing and snooze. They let the frequency increase by a fraction of 1 Hz.
Obviously you have at both points at that moment different frequencies. Only for a fraction of a second, though.
So: they are obviously not talking about the grid frequency itself but some other effect which is related to it but don't say what that effect is.
Why would a tool that emits x86 code on macOS do anything different on windows/x86?
You forgot the mandatory: :P
"Motherfucker!"
That is how it works in Europe too ... but not all clocks are radio clocks, you know ...
What has the question if old AC synched clocks go wrong to do with software?
Oh, you think there is a chip counting the AC flips from high to low, which is controlled by software?
Who would build such an idiotic clock?
A quartz crystal has excellent short-term accuracy, but lousy long-term accuracy.
And you don't grasp that his statement makes no sense?
because the power companies handle all of the necessary corrections.
No. Power companies make no "corrections". They attempt to keep the grid frequency _stable_
If the grid was below desired frequency in the morning, because of people suck unexpected more power, they do nothing in the evening to compensate for that. Why would they?
Yeah,
there was that story, and I debunked it that time already.
No one prevents you to put any background hum for a date in the past into your recording, assuming you know the correct hum.
And the hum varies on location. On top of that it would require some "authority" to record all relevant "back ground hums" on all "interesting locations".
So: this is bollocks!
Me too,
I would pick the Mac.
Would save me more than $1000 to figure how to get OS X running on the Alienware.
Actually no. 4cents tips is an insult, it should be at least 40, and that should be rounded to 50 cents. :-P
Ok, idiot.
It does not do static code analysis.
You still have not read the story or the linked article.
I don't exercise any religion.
So I don't tell you why Paul said this or that.
Point is: in christian religion there is no moral point that nudity is immoral.
And the old testament is not christian religion, it is a reference book about what christians are not: e.g. christians prefer forgiveness over revenge.
You citing old testament but don't know that is for christians more or less irrelevant. It is a collection of historical events, e.g. Moses flight from Egypt or the conquest by Babylon, and law and health rules and other events, "suggestions".
Heck christians can not even agree if/which parts of the old testament "make sense": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The Old Testament consists of many distinct books by various authors produced over a period of centuries.[4] Christians traditionally divide the Old Testament into four sections: (1) the first five books or Pentateuch (Torah); (2) the history books telling the history of the Israelites, from their conquest of Canaan to their defeat and exile in Babylon; (3) the poetic and "Wisdom books" dealing, in various forms, with questions of good and evil in the world; and (4) the books of the biblical prophets, warning of the consequences of turning away from God.
Anyway, I have no problem with christians as long as they don't impose their self invented personal moral views on the rest of the world.
A friend of mine always says: all the evil on the world coms from the monotheistic religions (and this focuses on the three main ones).
Anyway, pray and live in peace!
P.S. look up the christian translation of the Indian greeting "Namaste" or the Thai version "Sawadee Khrap". Hint: it is wrong. And there is a reason why it is wrong. So sad ...
GP doesn't know what he's talking about
Actually I do. And so would you if you ever had taken a law class or watch european press about companies trying to TOSs rules down the throat of their "customers".
Then read this: https://slashdot.org/comments....
Depends on the web site, as I said before.
The legal age for accessing porn is 18, so no, you can not raise it to 21.
No idea why you think you could.
What is next? A Bank with online banking that restricts access to people above 21?
Either banks and porn hubs are considered equal under law or not. You can not have one one way and the other one the other way.
Nonsense like this you can do in a house where you are the host and a nice law wich has nothing to do with age, says: the owner of the house can decide who he lets in.
And then again: a bank can not do that, and a pub/bar/club is on the borderline of illegal if he tries this. Many do that nevertheless ...
And you can not TOSs out people out of a grosery store either, because they do not fit your definition of age.
In my country ... no idea about yours.
Yes, a company that is providing a messaging service, telecommunication etc. has to make sure that every message arrives.
What is so hard to grasp in that?
That is funny, becuae if you written an efficent traveling salesmen algorithm you had solved the P=NP question.
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
Im pretty sure you can not write a program that figures if I have written an infinite loop. And: there is no solution to the halting problem. No one evver asked to solve it. It is an axiom, like there infinite natural numbers. .and funnily half of them are odd, the other half is even ... which indicates you could divide infinity into two halfs, both half as big as infinity ... no?
That is not christian ... that is jewish. ...
And it has nothing to do with walking around nude
Of course they can have _stricter_ rules. Depending on the laws anyway. E.g. if the law says a 10 year old can use certain web sites, they can not raise it to 13.
But a TOS alowing them to read messages is against telecomunication laws.
So: how would younmake it more strict? By writing into the TOS parents may not read messages of children over age X? Sorry, can't do that.
You as a person, may not read my message.
But if you let your dog sniff at the envelop and it barks, you put a stamp on it saying 'suspicious', that would be legal.
If automated scanning of mails/messages is legal or illegal is a matter of the country. I have no idea if it is illegal in the EU. But if you hired enough people to actually read the messages, or even read the message after an automated system flagged them: that would be illegal.
I did mot say they have to allow any post that does not be in conflict with the law.
I said law is above tos, they can not restrict freedoms of customers based on a tos when the law says otherwise.
Why you are such an idiot noot to grasp that is beyond me.
The question here btw. is not about posts - which are somewhat public - but about messages, which are protecccted by privacy and secrecy laws. Go figure ...
Oh man, you did not read the summary or the articfle? only watched a movie while being distracted on another web site?
It is so super simple that I wonder why no one else had that idea before.
A developers commits a piece of code to the source repository. Lets call that 'A'
Later there is a bug found, which is in the issue tracker.
Some guy fixes it.
Now we have a ticket in the issue tracker connected to the source code repository: to the fix and thus also connected to the bug.
Call that a rule or a hint. Or: a pattern.
When ever a developer tries to commit code, the commit hook, aka the AI, checks the repository for patters that look similar to 'A' and sets a warning that it might be buggy, because something similar like 'A' was fixed before.
The clue is to analyze the changed code, based on tickets that got fixed.
The AI is not writing code.
It is reviewing code.
Small difference. AI will never write code, unless it is a near human level intelligent being.
No, it is not a static code analyzer.
You seem to old to grasp new concepts.
Why don't you read the article instead of continuing to make an idiot out of your self?
You should read the article.
It has absolutely nothing to do with LINT and is not the same concept.
It's their TOS, and as a member, they don't need a court order to read your messages.
Regardless of TOS they are not allowed to read the messages at all. Even automated scanning for any purpose is on the edge to be illegal.
No idea why here are so many idiots who think a TOS has more weight then the law has.
Regarding the curt order: a court can order them to hand over messages, but not allow them to read them.