Considering that Germany once was the top notch researchers in electric cars (and Daimler is still dreaming about hydrogen powered fuel cell EV cars), it is a shame how the car industry here developed.
This is absolute drivel, there's no such thing as absolute security. On the mere level of a web site, there most definitely is!
Making software secure is not trivial but also not impossible.
If you mean with "totally secure" that a ninja could break into the data hosting facility and steal unencrypted harddisks or install network sniffers, yes, then you have a point.
How ever as we all understand here that data breach was a simple software "problem" which could have been prevented with proper design, reviews etc.
Sugar is not a drug. Wow that was silly. For people who are addicted to sugar, sugar obviously is a drug.
People who drink x cups of coffee daily perform the same as people who don't drink coffee (or otherwise consume large amounts of caffeine). Yes and no. The people who are depended on caffeine drop in performance significantly if they don't get it.
Claiming that certain drugs are okay because they "may" be Spiritual would be like saying loads of other extremely dangerous experiences are okay because they "may" be "Spiritual". Most drugs are "ok".
Society/laws that outlaw them makes them not ok, unreasonable expensive, only available via criminal sources, polluted by substances to thin them out (and you can not go to the police and accuse your pusher "oh, he sold me 100% pure stuff, but it was not only just 45% but also contaminated with baby butt powder"), requiring you to become a half criminal as well, to acquire them, either because of black market or money issues or addiction, wich you probably would not have if you simply could get a nice shot every weekend from your pharmacy.
Sorry, but if you have no clue about drugs then stay out of the discussion.
Disclaimer: except alcohol and canabis I did not use drugs. But I don't know a single person that did not try LSD, mushrooms, Heroine or Cocaine. Well, now while I type this, I think I know one person who did not, perhaps two.
And guess what: none of them is an addictive drug abuser.
The idea about drugs in the US or mainstream european politics are just absolutely absurd.
That is not the coal the is burned in power plants.
And which part of "regardless how many hydrogen coal contains: it is completely irrelevant for water vapour creation" did you not get?
If you would look at the numbers you quote: you would realize they make no real sense anyway... up to you.
If there is hydrogen in the coal it is already bound to something, probably the oxygen, hence the moisture, rofl.
I'm sorry that I have overestimated your intelligence, yet again. No problem. I try hard not to underestimate the stupidity of other people, but I fail still so often.
Not everyone that rides out a hurricane is "stupid", some don't have the means to leave the area. Then I would slowly start to question 'what is wrong' with "your system".
If there is a call for evacuation in Germany, happens rarely, but happens: the government provides the means of evacuation. AND: takes care that EVERYONE is evacuated. The only way to not get evacuated is to actively play hide and seek. And if you get caught doing that the punishment is heavy fines and/or jail time.
El Ninos and La Ninas last several years. And between them is a "neutral" phase. After the neutral phase it is basically open what is happening next. El Nino and La Ninas are not strictly alternating events.
What is wrong with intelligent people like you? Ignoring facts? For what? What is your benefit making bollocks post on/. ? None, I'm sure. So why do you do it?
The problem with people like you is simple: you/they are super dumb.
What do you need for a hurricane? 1) A water area big enough, lets say 100 km in diameter 2) a water temperature of above 26.5 degrees celsius 3) lack of interfering mid and high altitude winds that disrupt the forming of a hurricane
With global warming you get more and bigger spots of 1) and the areas of 2) have a high temperature into a deeper depth. Deeper depth means: more power for the storm. Bigger area means: bigger storm. Bigger extend of the warm water zones mean: more storms.
Even if house prices would increase by 100% it still would be 30% cheaper than rebuilding the whole house 2 times (and that does not even include the saved cost for new furniture,TV, computer etc. )
Burning coal does not produce water. The little bit of water that is result from burning natural gas is just a grain of sand in relation to the amount of water vapour that is produced by the sun and raising from the oceans.
The 1920 storm was a baby child in relation to Irma, Andrew or Katrina. It simply did more(?) damage and costed more lives because of much worse infrastructure and late/no warning.
Regardless of climate change, you always can have an out of the line event.
Refineries usually eat their own dog food. Aka: they use oil to refine and crack oil...
And if one is interested: pipelines, especially for gas, work the same way. They use the fuel they transport to power the pumps. I always have to shake my head when people are yelling about "transportation losses" of electricity...
Slashdot Mirror
Considering that Germany once was the top notch researchers in electric cars (and Daimler is still dreaming about hydrogen powered fuel cell EV cars), it is a shame how the car industry here developed.
Considering the Italian location, I would call it: Bugatti Electra.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(Yes, I know the difference between Greek and Latin :D )
However the name giver would be this Electra: http://www.theoi.com/Nymphe/Ny...
This is absolute drivel, there's no such thing as absolute security.
On the mere level of a web site, there most definitely is!
Making software secure is not trivial but also not impossible.
If you mean with "totally secure" that a ninja could break into the data hosting facility and steal unencrypted harddisks or install network sniffers, yes, then you have a point.
How ever as we all understand here that data breach was a simple software "problem" which could have been prevented with proper design, reviews etc.
Anything you do under the influence is something you could have done anyway without it
That is nonsense.
As always, I suggest: read a book about it.
Sugar is not a drug.
Wow that was silly.
For people who are addicted to sugar, sugar obviously is a drug.
People who drink x cups of coffee daily perform the same as people who don't drink coffee (or otherwise consume large amounts of caffeine).
Yes and no.
The people who are depended on caffeine drop in performance significantly if they don't get it.
Claiming that certain drugs are okay because they "may" be Spiritual would be like saying loads of other extremely dangerous experiences are okay because they "may" be "Spiritual".
Most drugs are "ok".
Society/laws that outlaw them makes them not ok, unreasonable expensive, only available via criminal sources, polluted by substances to thin them out (and you can not go to the police and accuse your pusher "oh, he sold me 100% pure stuff, but it was not only just 45% but also contaminated with baby butt powder"), requiring you to become a half criminal as well, to acquire them, either because of black market or money issues or addiction, wich you probably would not have if you simply could get a nice shot every weekend from your pharmacy.
Sorry, but if you have no clue about drugs then stay out of the discussion.
Disclaimer: except alcohol and canabis I did not use drugs. But I don't know a single person that did not try LSD, mushrooms, Heroine or Cocaine. Well, now while I type this, I think I know one person who did not, perhaps two.
And guess what: none of them is an addictive drug abuser.
The idea about drugs in the US or mainstream european politics are just absolutely absurd.
bituminous coal
You know what that is?
That is not the coal the is burned in power plants.
And which part of "regardless how many hydrogen coal contains: it is completely irrelevant for water vapour creation" did you not get?
If you would look at the numbers you quote: you would realize they make no real sense anyway ... up to you.
If there is hydrogen in the coal it is already bound to something, probably the oxygen, hence the moisture, rofl.
I'm sorry that I have overestimated your intelligence, yet again.
No problem. I try hard not to underestimate the stupidity of other people, but I fail still so often.
You mean water.
Or do you really mean hydrogen?
From what should hydrogen get into coal? Hu?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Coal is 99% carbon and the rest is the dirt it was formed in.
Perhaps you should read and try to comprehend the link you gave.
You love fake news so much?
http://www.slate.com/articles/...
Not everyone that rides out a hurricane is "stupid", some don't have the means to leave the area.
Then I would slowly start to question 'what is wrong' with "your system".
If there is a call for evacuation in Germany, happens rarely, but happens: the government provides the means of evacuation. AND: takes care that EVERYONE is evacuated. The only way to not get evacuated is to actively play hide and seek. And if you get caught doing that the punishment is heavy fines and/or jail time.
In gods own country, yes.
In Europe not so much.
Well, if you find coal that contains hydrogene inany meaningfull amount message me. ... perhaps you want to look that up?
Coal is basically pure carbon
You felt insulted?
By what?
El Ninos and La Ninas last several years. And between them is a "neutral" phase. After the neutral phase it is basically open what is happening next. El Nino and La Ninas are not strictly alternating events.
Oh, come one. Don't put your intelligence under your bed.
http://policlimate.com/tropica...
What is wrong with intelligent people like you? Ignoring facts? For what? What is your benefit making bollocks post on /. ? None, I'm sure. So why do you do it?
Coal does not contain hydrogen ... ...
You should have figured that by now
There was no 11 years of low activity.
Just because they did not hit Florida or Texas does not mean they were not there.
The problem with people like you is simple: you/they are super dumb.
What do you need for a hurricane?
1) A water area big enough, lets say 100 km in diameter
2) a water temperature of above 26.5 degrees celsius
3) lack of interfering mid and high altitude winds that disrupt the forming of a hurricane
With global warming you get more and bigger spots of 1) and the areas of 2) have a high temperature into a deeper depth. Deeper depth means: more power for the storm. Bigger area means: bigger storm. Bigger extend of the warm water zones mean: more storms.
A complete no brainer.
But you prefer to believe in conspiracy theories.
Even if house prices would increase by 100% it still would be 30% cheaper than rebuilding the whole house 2 times (and that does not even include the saved cost for new furniture,TV, computer etc. )
Burning coal does not produce water.
The little bit of water that is result from burning natural gas is just a grain of sand in relation to the amount of water vapour that is produced by the sun and raising from the oceans.
Get a perspective, man ...
That should be modded funny, not troll.
The 1920 storm was a baby child in relation to Irma, Andrew or Katrina.
It simply did more(?) damage and costed more lives because of much worse infrastructure and late/no warning.
Regardless of climate change, you always can have an out of the line event.
... but make sure no one sees you. It might violate some "electronic trash disposal" laws.
Refineries usually eat their own dog food. ...
Aka: they use oil to refine and crack oil
And if one is interested: pipelines, especially for gas, work the same way. They use the fuel they transport to power the pumps. I always have to shake my head when people are yelling about "transportation losses" of electricity ...
They charge at night? When the plants are idle?