In theory you still can do that, but it is meanwhile forbidden to carry an edged sword 'ready to use'. You have to carry it in your car or a locked container if you are walking around.
I don't use my Katana in public, only in dojo and on demonstrations. In Berlin you even need to ask for a police permit when you want to use it in a public/outdoor performance.
I used a scythe perhaps hundreds of times. So do a lot of people, it is a normal gardening tool. Blindseer lives in an odd world and thinks the rest of the world must be even more weird.
I see people practicing Iaido in the Parc of the Castle, I practice with wooden Swords or leather wrapped Bamboo swords. The police finds it entertaining and they usually stop by for a few minutes and ask about style and tradition, then they walk on.
There must be a lot of insanity in France if they think that they can both reduce nuclear power use while reducing their reliance on coal and oil. Well, look at it from Ockam's razors perspective, what is more likely: a) French people, government, industry is insane or b) blindseer is to blind to see and has no clue about what he is talking?
I guess the answer is pretty obvious for all of us, and it is obvious that you will pick the opposite answer.
The loading infrastructure will be in parking lots, not in "fuel stations". Modern roads will have wireless recharging during travel build in... especially the highways.
Nuclear would mean less land needed, less labor, less material dug from the ground, just generally cheaper in the end really. Well, unless you spread lies about Germany again, this will likely be my last answer to your posts. Yippie! Be happy!
Woud you care to google for an uranium mine and a lignite mine ? You might be in for some tough surprises.
Germany tried that already and they had to resort to burning brown coal to keep up with demand. That is a lie. Because you moron KNOW that this statement is wrong. Why are you spreading such bullshit?
Most of your posts are simply super dumb, because you have no clue. But spreading lies is something different!!
They go from 70% (which are only 2/3rds running right now), so actuall power production right now is about 42% down to... Well, here gets tricky: they want to reduce by 50%... so if that is "all nukes" the reaming contribution by nukes will be 35%. Or if they look only at the nukes running right now, then the drop will be from 42% to 21%.
Neither 35% nor 21% is a "shitload of nuclear plants", even Germany has still more than 20% of its electricity from nuclear plants.
France is not planning or building new nukes. 1/3 of their nukes right now are not running, mainly because safety overhauls and clean ups of minor incidents.
15% - 30% of their power is already renewable. The rest they import, mostly from Germany.
They just don't make a big fuss about it. And in 50 years most likely France will be out of the nuclear industry, just like Germany.
though its fairly typical for governments to make grandiose decisions that they will be in no way accountable for. And what would be your way of doing it? No big end date? Running the government like a company at the edge of bankruptcy "hu, which bills do I pay today, which can I postpone, when comes the next money in...?" That style of governing?
Basically every nuke in France was planned by one government and finished by another... that is what governments are for: setting long term goals and make legislation to achieve them.
Actually the Hutu and Tutsi one is worse - since no such ethnicities existed prior to colonization. That is a/. Myth (or an american myth, no idea). I suggest to read the relevant Articles.
True is that the colonial troops when they handed out passports, randomly put Tutsi or Hutu into them based on "race". While that happened rarely it happened often enough
There were no french in that region (Ruanda), first there were Germans then Belgians.
JFYI: Huti and Tutsi are so far ethnic separated, their languages are not even related. And yes: they look completely different. But well, they all black for you I suppose.
The analysis is correct but no longer appropriated.
E.g. in Germany we produces Biodiesel and it is not really competing with oils for food. Because we already have much to much oil (not enough to feed all cars of course).
Anyway, the main point is: oils for industries will be in future produced by Algae, probably as part of waste water treatment.
And don't get me started on the stupidity of OHIP (Ontario's Health system), I've watched them spend close to $300,000 twice on friends or relatives who had zero chance of recovery. That would happen in most western health care systems. And rightfully so. You never really know the chance of a small wonder. The only treatments in Germany which can be denied, not technically, but by playing the system are transplantations. People are on a list, basically how urgent it is. But there is also a factor involved, how likely and how long the receiver will survive. So if a 35 year old healthy father of a family and a 65 year old alcoholics are the two possible candidates, then the 65 is "technically" on top of the list, as he needs it more urgent, BUT: he will not get it because he is an alcoholics.
Cancer treatment is always done with maximum use of every suitable weapon available.
Don't think about it as a mere battery. It is a power plant.
Instead of burning coal, it uses previously stored power. A power plant with 100MW peak (saw that here in the threat, not sure if that is correct) and a few hours time to actually deliver so much power is equivalent to a small power plant.
You seem to have a fundamental inability to grasp basic economics. There is no basic economics.
There is only the bullshit you (that means YOU in YOUR country) learn in school, and the harsh reality that absolutely does not match what you learn in school.
Yes, some other company is at the losing end: the one that isn't profitable enough to compete for the limited supply of highly skilled developers. You seem not to grasp it: X open positions. Y possible candidates. Y < X. You can shift the payment for the job as high as you want, can afford... there will never be enough to fulfill demand: because those people simply don't exist!!!
So collapses your supply demand fallacy.... and your "basic economics"... wow, that was easy.
By increasing the price/wage for a job you don't get more people able doing that job. The amount of people able to do that job stays constant. That is why you either need immigrates or a better "ministry of education" with "a plan"... but you (you as a society) have no plan.
Sorry, that I sound so cynical... it is 3:00 at night at my place, and actually I should not teach people from other countries how bad their education and "basic economics" classes are.
There are people that don't live inside of the USA. And some of them have internet connected devices.
If you really want the numbers: I have more Skype contacts, than WhatsApp, Viber, KiK, Telegram, Trema, iMessanger together. And I probably missed one or two apps... because I only use them once a year.
Skype is on the decline since the founders sold it. And since M$ bought it it is utter shit. Don't let me start about "skype for business", Lync or something it is called. I slowly convert my friends to Telegram. And as soon as we have a good video chat app again, Skype will be dead. I'm sick of that "tyranny of vendors"...
The Skype team clearly has a different view of its work. "We think it's the best Skype we've ever built -- inside and out -- and it's been designed to make it easier for you to use for your everyday communications," The best I can say about developers who make statements like that is: "they are likely demented" otherwise they would know better.
(E.g. when I go offline with Skype on my iPad, my Mac goes offline, too!!!! How retarded is that?)
Slashdot Mirror
Significance?
In what regard? Comedy show?
In theory you still can do that, but it is meanwhile forbidden to carry an edged sword 'ready to use'.
You have to carry it in your car or a locked container if you are walking around.
I don't use my Katana in public, only in dojo and on demonstrations. In Berlin you even need to ask for a police permit when you want to use it in a public/outdoor performance.
I used a scythe perhaps hundreds of times.
So do a lot of people, it is a normal gardening tool.
Blindseer lives in an odd world and thinks the rest of the world must be even more weird.
I see people practicing Iaido in the Parc of the Castle, I practice with wooden Swords or leather wrapped Bamboo swords. The police finds it entertaining and they usually stop by for a few minutes and ask about style and tradition, then they walk on.
There must be a lot of insanity in France if they think that they can both reduce nuclear power use while reducing their reliance on coal and oil.
Well, look at it from Ockam's razors perspective, what is more likely:
a) French people, government, industry is insane or
b) blindseer is to blind to see and has no clue about what he is talking?
I guess the answer is pretty obvious for all of us, and it is obvious that you will pick the opposite answer.
The loading infrastructure will be in parking lots, not in "fuel stations". ... especially the highways.
Modern roads will have wireless recharging during travel build in
A power plant runs at efficiencies around 42%, sometimes the remaining heat can used further.
A car engine runs below 20%.
So producing electricity and using electric cars nearly doubles the efficiency.
Nuclear would mean less land needed, less labor, less material dug from the ground, just generally cheaper in the end really.
Well, unless you spread lies about Germany again, this will likely be my last answer to your posts. Yippie! Be happy!
Woud you care to google for an uranium mine and a lignite mine ? You might be in for some tough surprises.
Well France is not talking about moving away from nuclear power are they?
Talking about it, no.
But doing it, yes.
Germany tried that already and they had to resort to burning brown coal to keep up with demand.
That is a lie. Because you moron KNOW that this statement is wrong. Why are you spreading such bullshit?
Most of your posts are simply super dumb, because you have no clue. But spreading lies is something different!!
They go from 70% (which are only 2/3rds running right now), so actuall power production right now is about 42% down to ... ... so if that is "all nukes" the reaming contribution by nukes will be 35%. Or if they look only at the nukes running right now, then the drop will be from 42% to 21%.
Well, here gets tricky: they want to reduce by 50%
Neither 35% nor 21% is a "shitload of nuclear plants", even Germany has still more than 20% of its electricity from nuclear plants.
France is not planning or building new nukes.
1/3 of their nukes right now are not running, mainly because safety overhauls and clean ups of minor incidents.
15% - 30% of their power is already renewable. The rest they import, mostly from Germany.
They just don't make a big fuss about it. And in 50 years most likely France will be out of the nuclear industry, just like Germany.
In the end you need land to put the plant on.
And you have to cope with the people around that land.
Good luck finding such land ...
though its fairly typical for governments to make grandiose decisions that they will be in no way accountable for. ...?" That style of governing?
And what would be your way of doing it? No big end date? Running the government like a company at the edge of bankruptcy "hu, which bills do I pay today, which can I postpone, when comes the next money in
Basically every nuke in France was planned by one government and finished by another ... that is what governments are for: setting long term goals and make legislation to achieve them.
Just google for world maps drawn by american school people, with "how big is america" compared to the rest of the world?
It is so laughable ...
Right now there is no religious war in the middle east.
There are only wars about territory and power.
You should look on a map ... someone above posted one, I take the liberty to repost it: https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/asset...
Actually the Hutu and Tutsi one is worse - since no such ethnicities existed prior to colonization. /. Myth (or an american myth, no idea).
That is a
I suggest to read the relevant Articles.
True is that the colonial troops when they handed out passports, randomly put Tutsi or Hutu into them based on "race". While that happened rarely it happened often enough
There were no french in that region (Ruanda), first there were Germans then Belgians.
JFYI: Huti and Tutsi are so far ethnic separated, their languages are not even related. And yes: they look completely different. But well, they all black for you I suppose.
The analysis is correct but no longer appropriated.
E.g. in Germany we produces Biodiesel and it is not really competing with oils for food. Because we already have much to much oil (not enough to feed all cars of course).
Anyway, the main point is: oils for industries will be in future produced by Algae, probably as part of waste water treatment.
And don't get me started on the stupidity of OHIP (Ontario's Health system), I've watched them spend close to $300,000 twice on friends or relatives who had zero chance of recovery.
That would happen in most western health care systems. And rightfully so. You never really know the chance of a small wonder.
The only treatments in Germany which can be denied, not technically, but by playing the system are transplantations.
People are on a list, basically how urgent it is. But there is also a factor involved, how likely and how long the receiver will survive. So if a 35 year old healthy father of a family and a 65 year old alcoholics are the two possible candidates, then the 65 is "technically" on top of the list, as he needs it more urgent, BUT: he will not get it because he is an alcoholics.
Cancer treatment is always done with maximum use of every suitable weapon available.
Don't think about it as a mere battery.
It is a power plant.
Instead of burning coal, it uses previously stored power.
A power plant with 100MW peak (saw that here in the threat, not sure if that is correct) and a few hours time to actually deliver so much power is equivalent to a small power plant.
Astonishing a group of large guns, aka cannons, is also a battery.
And I guess we find more examples if we think a bit longer.
You seem to have a fundamental inability to grasp basic economics.
There is no basic economics.
There is only the bullshit you (that means YOU in YOUR country) learn in school, and the harsh reality that absolutely does not match what you learn in school.
Yes, some other company is at the losing end: the one that isn't profitable enough to compete for the limited supply of highly skilled developers. ... there will never be enough to fulfill demand: because those people simply don't exist!!!
You seem not to grasp it: X open positions. Y possible candidates. Y < X. You can shift the payment for the job as high as you want, can afford
So collapses your supply demand fallacy .... and your "basic economics" ... wow, that was easy.
By increasing the price/wage for a job you don't get more people able doing that job. The amount of people able to do that job stays constant. ... but you (you as a society) have no plan.
That is why you either need immigrates or a better "ministry of education" with "a plan"
Sorry, that I sound so cynical ... it is 3:00 at night at my place, and actually I should not teach people from other countries how bad their education and "basic economics" classes are.
Look at my name? Email?
Skype does not use port 80.
They use "fire wall piercing".
There are people that don't live inside of the USA.
And some of them have internet connected devices.
If you really want the numbers: I have more Skype contacts, than WhatsApp, Viber, KiK, Telegram, Trema, iMessanger together. And I probably missed one or two apps ... because I only use them once a year.
Skype I use daily.
Skype is on the decline since the founders sold it. ...
And since M$ bought it it is utter shit. Don't let me start about "skype for business", Lync or something it is called.
I slowly convert my friends to Telegram. And as soon as we have a good video chat app again, Skype will be dead.
I'm sick of that "tyranny of vendors"
The Skype team clearly has a different view of its work. "We think it's the best Skype we've ever built -- inside and out -- and it's been designed to make it easier for you to use for your everyday communications,"
The best I can say about developers who make statements like that is: "they are likely demented" otherwise they would know better.
(E.g. when I go offline with Skype on my iPad, my Mac goes offline, too!!!! How retarded is that?)