The only reasonable way to evaluate safety is to compare the deaths per unit energy for all energy sources No it is not. As no one dies to the energy...
And your links you like to throw around, simply ommit all the death du to nuclear. E.g. roughly a mission dead after Chernobyl. Hundred thousands died do to uranium mining... I mean: you account coal death to mining... not to dying from a stroke at a plug from coal energy... why don't you account for the dead who died to open pit mining of uranium ore?
The wind is not piped by command of anyone into a trans country interconnect.
Which part of: "Every energy transport is either planned (and) day ahead or hourly ahead, or in rare cases a minute ahead." Don't you grasp?
It is forbidden and taken care for that no unannounced power is going through an interconnect. In what stupid reality do you live that you think a german power provider would just "dumb power" over an interconnect to another country and the other country has to deal with it? How the funk could that possibly work?
When you provide someone with employment, you are required by law to provide them with "tyÃterveys", literally "work health". Yeah, but that is what you claimed Finnland would not have: socialized healthcare. Obviously one has to pay, and in your case it is the company. That is not what we would call "private health insurance", it is still "public health insurance".
The majority of foreign/local films aren't worth the bandwidth for the majority of people though. That is nonsense.
If people want to see it, then Netflix would pick it up Obviously the streaming business does not work that way. They stream what they have and know what creates revenue. They are not looking at Europe and say: hm, lets see if they have good movies, too.
Medical science tells us that such a cancer is highly unlikely to be caused by exposures at these levels. There is a huge body of science to back this up. Medical science tells us that the "level" is completely irrelevant if you inhale radioactive materials, especially plutonium. As he got lung cancer, Plutonium is a bit unlikely unless he got a very high dose.
If you had bothered to read the article: his lung has hot spots of radiation. He died to lung cancer... go figure, you are really an idiot.
P.S. Reactors didn't explode. P.S. it did. After the hydrogen explosions (that is what you mention) there were several melt downs causing steam explosions, why don't you look at a picture of the site?
As we know since a while after the tsunami: Either solution would have solved this. , no. The cooling system inside the reactors was destroyed by the quake.
I think it's safe to make a claim that even old reactors are safe from radiation's lethality standpoint when lethality of the entire event is considered If you can run away quick enough.
If the people had stayed the majourity would be dead or dying.
Yep. So, after SEVEN YEARS, we've had one (1) death as a result of a massive tsunami hitting a nuclear power plant. That's almost as many deaths as occurred commuting to work today where I live... We have one official death, and hundreds of unofficial ones. Cases where the family got a big paycheck and a terminal ill worker volunteered to clean up. Japan news regularly brings up that topic.
It has to do with a defective sea defense. You can build a high enough dike around a facility. The water will just flow around the dike then.
But you could not reasonably put an high enough dike around an island. A dike will just make the water rise higher, until it goes over the top. However it likely will prevent it to let flood to far into the hinterland.
What you can do and should do, is having buildings that can withstand the flood. With a safe zone on the roof and the upper levels. Escape routes for humans. Dikes directing the water away from towns to the fields. Emergency procedures to warn the population in time. E.g. SMS based and warning lights on posts along the coast. More precisely on street lights and traffic lights. Elevated save points that can harbour a few 1000 people.
You also could teach people some common sense... the news about the quake was hours old when the Tsunami hit.
Japan just apoligized to have 100dreds of vietnamese "guest workers" working unprotected at the Fukushima site for "educational purpose". Most of them will die over the next 10 or 20 years...
In the developed world, all the available hydro has been exploited. That is nonsense. Switzerland is more or less empty, so is Austria and USA e.g. has close to zero river flow plants. I bet in Germany we easy can build a few terrawatt, if we needed.
If your wind plant does not produce nameplate or more power, you have placed it at the wrong place. And that you knew before. How one comes to the idiotic idea that you have to take nameplate times 3 is beyond me. E.G. without storage, it does not matter how much solar power you install. At night the sun is down, obviously.
Hydro and other storage simply cannot cope with the long periods of low renewables production that happen frequently. Strange that this is not happening in the countries that have lots of renewables, like Denmark and Germany.
That leaves very few baseload energy generations Baseload is aline on a graph. It does not care if it is generated by 24/7/365 plant at 95% or by a intermittent solar plant or wind plant. Load following plants have to follow demand either around demand change or demand change + renewable change, who cares?
Unless you produce significantly more power than your base load line, you have no need or use for big storage.
The artists, aka makers, would not earn anything if they host it privately on Youtube.... how exactly do you stream via WhatsApp anyway?
people that want it can see it instead of getting it shoved down your throat at gunpoint. People do want to see it. But they can't because the streaming services only stream american crap. And then not even into every country. Can you imagine how retarded it is, to have a German netflix account, but you can not watch the movies when you are on vacation in Thailand, because they are not "released there yet"? Why the funk do I have a streaming account if exactly then, when I have the most time to use it, can't use it?
And that do all high level languages, like Python, Lua, Lisp, Prolog, Erlang etc.
There are plenty of universities that never even teach C or C++... because they teach "Computer Science", not "programming". If you want to learn C, you have t take a special class. But if a CS student can not learn it from a book, he probably should not be in CS anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
Does each home only use 1.1KW ? seriously ?
On average at a given time, yes. Actually much less.
On shore wind has the same predictability as off shore wind.
It only is usually not as strong and not as steady.
You are missing imports and exports.
The only reasonable way to evaluate safety is to compare the deaths per unit energy for all energy sources ...
No it is not.
As no one dies to the energy
And your links you like to throw around, simply ommit all the death du to nuclear. E.g. roughly a mission dead after Chernobyl. Hundred thousands died do to uranium mining ... I mean: you account coal death to mining ... not to dying from a stroke at a plug from coal energy ... why don't you account for the dead who died to open pit mining of uranium ore?
The wind is not piped by command of anyone into a trans country interconnect.
Which part of: "Every energy transport is either planned (and) day ahead or hourly ahead, or in rare cases a minute ahead." Don't you grasp?
It is forbidden and taken care for that no unannounced power is going through an interconnect. In what stupid reality do you live that you think a german power provider would just "dumb power" over an interconnect to another country and the other country has to deal with it? How the funk could that possibly work?
Of course you would use structs or classes and user defined operators. That is the point!
But what have pointers to do with that?
When you provide someone with employment, you are required by law to provide them with "tyÃterveys", literally "work health".
Yeah, but that is what you claimed Finnland would not have: socialized healthcare. Obviously one has to pay, and in your case it is the company. That is not what we would call "private health insurance", it is still "public health insurance".
The majority of foreign/local films aren't worth the bandwidth for the majority of people though.
That is nonsense.
If people want to see it, then Netflix would pick it up
Obviously the streaming business does not work that way. They stream what they have and know what creates revenue. They are not looking at Europe and say: hm, lets see if they have good movies, too.
Sure why not?
There is no big opposition against building a dam in the mountains, what would be the damn point of that?
Switzerland is planning to become the "storage hub" for all Europe over the next decades.
Most people work with safety gear, hundreds of "guest workers" worked without gear.
You are extremely uninformed about the topic.
Why don't you go to youtube and watch a few documenetaries about it?
Medical science tells us that such a cancer is highly unlikely to be caused by exposures at these levels. There is a huge body of science to back this up.
Medical science tells us that the "level" is completely irrelevant if you inhale radioactive materials, especially plutonium. As he got lung cancer, Plutonium is a bit unlikely unless he got a very high dose.
If you had bothered to read the article: his lung has hot spots of radiation. He died to lung cancer ... go figure, you are really an idiot.
P.S. Reactors didn't explode.
P.S. it did. After the hydrogen explosions (that is what you mention) there were several melt downs causing steam explosions, why don't you look at a picture of the site?
As we know since a while after the tsunami: Either solution would have solved this. , no. The cooling system inside the reactors was destroyed by the quake.
I think it's safe to make a claim that even old reactors are safe from radiation's lethality standpoint when lethality of the entire event is considered
If you can run away quick enough.
If the people had stayed the majourity would be dead or dying.
Yep. So, after SEVEN YEARS, we've had one (1) death as a result of a massive tsunami hitting a nuclear power plant. That's almost as many deaths as occurred commuting to work today where I live...
We have one official death, and hundreds of unofficial ones. Cases where the family got a big paycheck and a terminal ill worker volunteered to clean up. Japan news regularly brings up that topic.
It has to do with a defective sea defense.
You can build a high enough dike around a facility. The water will just flow around the dike then.
But you could not reasonably put an high enough dike around an island. A dike will just make the water rise higher, until it goes over the top. However it likely will prevent it to let flood to far into the hinterland.
What you can do and should do, is having buildings that can withstand the flood. With a safe zone on the roof and the upper levels.
Escape routes for humans.
Dikes directing the water away from towns to the fields.
Emergency procedures to warn the population in time. E.g. SMS based and warning lights on posts along the coast. More precisely on street lights and traffic lights.
Elevated save points that can harbour a few 1000 people.
You also could teach people some common sense ... the news about the quake was hours old when the Tsunami hit.
The focus is on "official".
Japan just apoligized to have 100dreds of vietnamese "guest workers" working unprotected at the Fukushima site for "educational purpose". Most of them will die over the next 10 or 20 years ...
In the developed world, all the available hydro has been exploited.
That is nonsense. Switzerland is more or less empty, so is Austria and USA e.g. has close to zero river flow plants. I bet in Germany we easy can build a few terrawatt, if we needed.
If your wind plant does not produce nameplate or more power, you have placed it at the wrong place.
And that you knew before. How one comes to the idiotic idea that you have to take nameplate times 3 is beyond me.
E.G. without storage, it does not matter how much solar power you install. At night the sun is down, obviously.
Hydro and other storage simply cannot cope with the long periods of low renewables production that happen frequently.
Strange that this is not happening in the countries that have lots of renewables, like Denmark and Germany.
If Fukushima would have been a Plutonium breeding/burning reactor, half of Japan would now be completely uninhabitable
So much to your "Freaking Hippies" analogy. Would you really like 50 million shintoists-ists invade your country and spread their unholy religion?
are offload only.
What is that supposed to mean?
That leaves very few baseload energy generations
Baseload is aline on a graph. It does not care if it is generated by 24/7/365 plant at 95% or by a intermittent solar plant or wind plant.
Load following plants have to follow demand either around demand change or demand change + renewable change, who cares?
Unless you produce significantly more power than your base load line, you have no need or use for big storage.
Because then the customer has to pay two subscriptions: one for netflix *and* one for the new european service.
The artists, aka makers, would not earn anything if they host it privately on Youtube .... how exactly do you stream via WhatsApp anyway?
people that want it can see it instead of getting it shoved down your throat at gunpoint.
People do want to see it. But they can't because the streaming services only stream american crap. And then not even into every country. Can you imagine how retarded it is, to have a German netflix account, but you can not watch the movies when you are on vacation in Thailand, because they are not "released there yet"? Why the funk do I have a streaming account if exactly then, when I have the most time to use it, can't use it?
The only resource Java is "hiding" is memory.
And that do all high level languages, like Python, Lua, Lisp, Prolog, Erlang etc.
There are plenty of universities that never even teach C or C++ ... because they teach "Computer Science", not "programming". If you want to learn C, you have t take a special class. But if a CS student can not learn it from a book, he probably should not be in CS anyway.
The first amendment does not allow you to infringe copy rights ...