In fact both wealth and income are distributed as poster said. 10% own >70% of wealth in U.S., and income is also skewed, although not as badly.
If you and I are standing in empty room, and Bill Gates walks in, how many of us have below average income/wealth? No reason the overall distribution isn't similarly skewed.
>>Unions, on the other hand, are gigolos. Their job is to pimp their members to special interests under the guise of "fairness" and "equality." They just want to keep their positions of power. Take away their whores and suddenly they aren't as big on the street as they used to be.
If unions are 'gigolos', what are employer-capitalists? Seems to me they fit the pimp analogy just as well. Do you think the employer pursues "fairness" in contrast to the union? In fact current law exposes a corporation that does so to share-holder lawsuit.
As to "sucking your unions boss's dick", can you not pull your nose our of your boss's ass-crack?
Slashdot Mirror
In fact both wealth and income are distributed as poster said. 10% own >70% of wealth in U.S., and income is also skewed, although not as badly.
If you and I are standing in empty room, and Bill Gates walks in, how many of us have below average income/wealth? No reason the overall distribution isn't similarly skewed.
>>Unions, on the other hand, are gigolos. Their job is to pimp their members to special interests under the guise of "fairness" and "equality." They just want to keep their positions of power. Take away their whores and suddenly they aren't as big on the street as they used to be. If unions are 'gigolos', what are employer-capitalists? Seems to me they fit the pimp analogy just as well. Do you think the employer pursues "fairness" in contrast to the union? In fact current law exposes a corporation that does so to share-holder lawsuit. As to "sucking your unions boss's dick", can you not pull your nose our of your boss's ass-crack?