Uhh, it's called "enlightened self-interest": given a choice to take down brutal, despotic regimes in areas where we have no real economic, strategic, or historical-cultural interest, or take them down in areas where we DO, given that we have finite resources, it's smart to concentrate on the latter, n'est-ce pas?
Slashdot Mirror
Uhh, it's called "enlightened self-interest": given a choice to take down brutal, despotic regimes in areas where we have no real economic, strategic, or historical-cultural interest, or take them down in areas where we DO, given that we have finite resources, it's smart to concentrate on the latter, n'est-ce pas?