From the more detailed article: "
Kirk Shireman, deputy shuttle program manager, says that while only one spider is visible, that doesn't mean the other is missing. 'We don't believe he has escaped the payload. I am sure we will find him spinning a web somewhere in the next few days.'"
This is why I don't trust any form of "Action" news.
Clearly, Eyewitness news is the only true reliable format.
Here's what I still don't get, if the game wasn't for profit, how could it possibly hurt their sales?
The way I see it, what all these big companies do is look for a fan game that's getting lots of props, shut it down, steal the idea, and pass it off as their own. I think that was the whole reason behind reissuing all those NES games for the GBA.
Slashdot Mirror
so .. ire meber being 16 .. and eating that one thing we used to eat when we were kids ... thats what being 16 is all about!!
...I fail to see what bearing fruit roll-ups have on this conversation.
From the more detailed article: " Kirk Shireman, deputy shuttle program manager, says that while only one spider is visible, that doesn't mean the other is missing. 'We don't believe he has escaped the payload. I am sure we will find him spinning a web somewhere in the next few days.'" This is why I don't trust any form of "Action" news.
Clearly, Eyewitness news is the only true reliable format.
Here's what I still don't get, if the game wasn't for profit, how could it possibly hurt their sales? The way I see it, what all these big companies do is look for a fan game that's getting lots of props, shut it down, steal the idea, and pass it off as their own. I think that was the whole reason behind reissuing all those NES games for the GBA.