FOX is no more slanted to the right than CNN is to the left. Take off your political blinders and see for yourself. (By the way, it's a little known fact that ratings for FOX were higher than both MSNBC and CNN during the DEMOCRATIC National Convention.)
I'd like to call Kerry an idiot for campaigning on his flimsy war record, but since his Senate record is worthless (and detremental to his cause), his only other option would be to discuss nothing of the past and only talk about what he could conceivably do in the future if elected president. However, his record of switching sides on key issues keeps coming back to him leaving people to wonder if he's really going to go through with the ideas he's laying out on the table.
Today's democrat (sorry for generalization) cannot be any more hypocritical, in my opinion. If any of them had reason to believe there were no WMD's in Iraq, they wouldn't have voted to give Bush authorization to go - INCLUDING KERRY. As it turns out, the intel Bush received from internal and international sources was incorrect. Suddenly, he's the liar for following acting upon what was accepted across both parties here to be true. For argument's sake, let's say the intel WAS true, and Saddam was procuring WMD's like crazy. Saddam plays hot potato with the WMD's moving them all over the place and the small crew of inspectors never finds them (Hans Blix admitted Saddam was not complying 100% with UN resolution 1441. In effect, he was complying just enough to keep the UN from forcibly disarming him). 2006, 9-11 all over again, only this time it's Iraq. The same people who are calling Bush a liar right now would be the same people criticizing him for not disarming Saddam when he had the chance.
You Dems need to heed the advice of your fellow 527 and "Move on" with the "Gore should have won" balderdash. Speaking of which, glad to hear Kerry is "reporting for duty" because the Swifties just sank his ship - just look at the polls. There's not a whole lot you can say when you make your service in Vietnam the central theme of your campaign when there's audio and video footage of you accusing your "band of brothers" of "razing villages in a fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Khan" all while throwing your medals over a fence. (Nevermind, lying about spending Christmas in Cambodia or meeting with the enemy on 3 separate occasions in Paris while his "band of brothers" was still fighting.)
As far as your corpulent friend Mr. Moore, anyone with a scintilla of common sense knows facts can be minced to acheive a desired outcome. If any of us could see the cutting room floor of Farenheit 911, you'd see just what I'm talking about. (Anyone have an idea when he'll be releasing Farenheit 1971? - just curious)
Like it or not, the men and women killed in Iraq and Afghanistan enlisted in the armed forces knowing that along with their job comes the possibly of laying down their lives. I doubt the people of Cantor Fitzgerald or anyone else working in the WTC or Pentagon had that same detail mentioned in any of their job descriptions.
Slashdot Mirror
How about the number of people killed, mutilated, and gassed by Saddam? You want to look at those numbers?
Unless your country is part of the coalition, no one gives and f what Europe has to say (except "thanks" for saving your asses 60 years ago).
FOX is no more slanted to the right than CNN is to the left. Take off your political blinders and see for yourself. (By the way, it's a little known fact that ratings for FOX were higher than both MSNBC and CNN during the DEMOCRATIC National Convention.)
That is f'ing hilarious! Thanks for the post!
I'd like to call Kerry an idiot for campaigning on his flimsy war record, but since his Senate record is worthless (and detremental to his cause), his only other option would be to discuss nothing of the past and only talk about what he could conceivably do in the future if elected president. However, his record of switching sides on key issues keeps coming back to him leaving people to wonder if he's really going to go through with the ideas he's laying out on the table.
Today's democrat (sorry for generalization) cannot be any more hypocritical, in my opinion. If any of them had reason to believe there were no WMD's in Iraq, they wouldn't have voted to give Bush authorization to go - INCLUDING KERRY. As it turns out, the intel Bush received from internal and international sources was incorrect. Suddenly, he's the liar for following acting upon what was accepted across both parties here to be true. For argument's sake, let's say the intel WAS true, and Saddam was procuring WMD's like crazy. Saddam plays hot potato with the WMD's moving them all over the place and the small crew of inspectors never finds them (Hans Blix admitted Saddam was not complying 100% with UN resolution 1441. In effect, he was complying just enough to keep the UN from forcibly disarming him). 2006, 9-11 all over again, only this time it's Iraq. The same people who are calling Bush a liar right now would be the same people criticizing him for not disarming Saddam when he had the chance.
You Dems need to heed the advice of your fellow 527 and "Move on" with the "Gore should have won" balderdash. Speaking of which, glad to hear Kerry is "reporting for duty" because the Swifties just sank his ship - just look at the polls. There's not a whole lot you can say when you make your service in Vietnam the central theme of your campaign when there's audio and video footage of you accusing your "band of brothers" of "razing villages in a fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Khan" all while throwing your medals over a fence. (Nevermind, lying about spending Christmas in Cambodia or meeting with the enemy on 3 separate occasions in Paris while his "band of brothers" was still fighting.) As far as your corpulent friend Mr. Moore, anyone with a scintilla of common sense knows facts can be minced to acheive a desired outcome. If any of us could see the cutting room floor of Farenheit 911, you'd see just what I'm talking about. (Anyone have an idea when he'll be releasing Farenheit 1971? - just curious)
Like it or not, the men and women killed in Iraq and Afghanistan enlisted in the armed forces knowing that along with their job comes the possibly of laying down their lives. I doubt the people of Cantor Fitzgerald or anyone else working in the WTC or Pentagon had that same detail mentioned in any of their job descriptions.