Municipal police in Canada, Regional Police in Canada, Provincial Police in Canada...
It might have read
'Local Police in a Country used a device without a warrant and some groups are having emotions about it'.
Or,
Ontario Provincial Police in Canada have successfully deployed a controversial and indiscriminate surveillance device called an IMSI catcher also known as a 'Stingray' in their efforts to curb crime'
Be completely generic, or be specific. You see how that works?
Nuclear non-proliferation agreement with Russia that allows the Russians to build as many as they like, while requiring the USA to unilaterally decrease their stockpile?
You need to invest in yourself in the form of continuing education. That involves your personal time and may as well coincide with what's needed at work.
You may not be impressed, but everyone seems to forget the enemy really is another intelligent human like themselves bent on the others destruction and will use all the resources available which would include testing every idea.
What I hate most about group-think is the assumption that the enemy will fight the way we want them to, while using the best possible scientific solution that we know everything about.
The first day stuff, actually we're so good at that it isn't even a challenge.
The first enemy to surprise the shit out of us is going to have a field day.
a series of in-field modifications carried out by the Yugoslavs further reduced the frequency of the 1960s vintage P-18 VHF acquisition radar under Dani’s command, which enabled his men to detect Zelko’s F-117 at a distance of 30 to 37 miles (50-60 km).
Most of Arizona is over 2000 feet above sea level.
It has yet to be proven that 'rising oceans' isn't just erosion taking it's toll. Also, whether it's erosion, rising water, or sublimation the Netherlands have an interesting solution. Personally, I would keep dumping dirt and rock to bring all of the land up not just build dikes.
Whether it's man made or "naturally" occurring, how does that affect the net result? I mean seriously, whether I die because someone runs me over with his car or whether a piece of rock collapses above me and caves my head in, do I care? I'm effin' dead either way, why the fuck would I give a fuck about whether someone is responsible for it afterwards?
This is bait but I will bite anyways. To leave something useful for our children, future generations, or future sentient species. We aren't going to be that future sentient race if the current generation of millennials are any indication. My point is that it's not man made, and our efforts could actually be making things worse. We do not understand the full nature of our planet by any stretch of the imagination. If we did, the weather man could predict the weather with 100% accuracy for the next 100 years.
About carbon credits, it's basically a subsidy to companies that have less polluting production in place. And the great thing about it is that the subsidy comes out of the polluter's pocket and not the taxpayer's pocket. What's your point?
If we truly want to cool this planet then we need to start planting trees. LOTS of them. Pay land owners a stipend for every tree over four they have on their property. This can come back to them at Tax time and the feds sell the earned carbon credits to the polluters. The timber industry would love this for all the forest land they own. It would encourage them to re-plant faster, and be more efficient in getting their tree's bigger, faster.
You have property in Arizona you want to sell as seaside property.
What could you do to convince someone that it was soon to become seaside property?
Well first you can convince them that the seas are going to rise. Again. But this time it's because man is causing it and not nature. Like how many other times we have evidence to support.
Now think things through.
Who is generating the carbon credits, how much does it cost to make them, how much are they selling for, and where is the money going?
Slashdot Mirror
If you own a Dodge built around 2000+ then yes.
And they used GPIO for most of it. Including the transmission shifting.
Compute capabilities have grown quite a bit.
Is anyone missing their old 486DX4 100?
I get pulled over for burned out lamps too. Must be cause I am white. :(
This joke is older than the exploit.
If your eyes are open to the reality that is coming. Yes.
Pretty sure your blood sugar is getting low there old man.
Your Sig is awesome though. :)
When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
Municipal police in Canada, Regional Police in Canada, Provincial Police in Canada...
It might have read
'Local Police in a Country used a device without a warrant and some groups are having emotions about it'.
Or,
Ontario Provincial Police in Canada have successfully deployed a controversial and indiscriminate surveillance device called an IMSI catcher also known as a 'Stingray' in their efforts to curb crime'
Be completely generic, or be specific. You see how that works?
Why not "Police in Canada" or "Canadian Police"
People have forgotten how to use words.
Local police in Canada
"Local" police from another freakin country.
thanks to a year-long effort by a coalition of civil rights organizations and Vancouver-based Pivot Legal Society
We have activists to thank for weakening law enforcement when it's more important than ever.
Nuclear non-proliferation agreement with Russia that allows the Russians to build as many as they like, while requiring the USA to unilaterally decrease their stockpile?
Citation needed.
I would remind you of the story about the ant, and the grasshopper.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
This is such a wasteful attitude.
Pretty much this.
You need to invest in yourself in the form of continuing education. That involves your personal time and may as well coincide with what's needed at work.
Land of the broke and the incarcerated.
You may not be impressed, but everyone seems to forget the enemy really is another intelligent human like themselves bent on the others destruction and will use all the resources available which would include testing every idea.
What I hate most about group-think is the assumption that the enemy will fight the way we want them to, while using the best possible scientific solution that we know everything about.
The first day stuff, actually we're so good at that it isn't even a challenge.
The first enemy to surprise the shit out of us is going to have a field day.
And now someone is going to do it just because you said nobody would. It's the Linux way.
a two-headed beast that can do a little Linux and can also be used to attack the Linux side of the system.
FTFY
Huge amount of group think going on here.
The F-35 May have been made invisible to the EMF spectrum used by radar, but there's far more frequencies that it will show up on.
https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...
http://aviationweek.com/techno...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I like this one. Clutter can be solved with good software.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
And this one is gold:
a series of in-field modifications carried out by the Yugoslavs further reduced the frequency of the 1960s vintage P-18 VHF acquisition radar under Dani’s command, which enabled his men to detect Zelko’s F-117 at a distance of 30 to 37 miles (50-60 km).
*In-field modifications* That's bad-ass.
http://thediplomat.com/2014/08...
Mocking valid points will not alter the reality of America's almost third-world status of it's infrastructure.
We lag in bandwidth, repair of our roads, bridges, rail systems, water management, most of our ISP's have data caps now despite 'net neutrality' etc.
Though we do lead the world in military spending and the number of people in jail by several orders of magnitude.
The real shitter? We have the power to change it, but instead allow ourselves to be distracted and led around by the entertainment industry.
Conspiracy much?
This old topic-dodge is old and way over used. Not acceptable.
Why should anyone assume that land in Arizona (of all places) would become a seaside resort location? Ever taken a look at a topography map?
Yes, I have, and you obviously haven't. Here:
http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/...
Most of Arizona is over 2000 feet above sea level.
It has yet to be proven that 'rising oceans' isn't just erosion taking it's toll. Also, whether it's erosion, rising water, or sublimation the Netherlands have an interesting solution. Personally, I would keep dumping dirt and rock to bring all of the land up not just build dikes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Whether it's man made or "naturally" occurring, how does that affect the net result? I mean seriously, whether I die because someone runs me over with his car or whether a piece of rock collapses above me and caves my head in, do I care? I'm effin' dead either way, why the fuck would I give a fuck about whether someone is responsible for it afterwards?
This is bait but I will bite anyways. To leave something useful for our children, future generations, or future sentient species. We aren't going to be that future sentient race if the current generation of millennials are any indication. My point is that it's not man made, and our efforts could actually be making things worse. We do not understand the full nature of our planet by any stretch of the imagination. If we did, the weather man could predict the weather with 100% accuracy for the next 100 years.
About carbon credits, it's basically a subsidy to companies that have less polluting production in place. And the great thing about it is that the subsidy comes out of the polluter's pocket and not the taxpayer's pocket. What's your point?
If we truly want to cool this planet then we need to start planting trees. LOTS of them. Pay land owners a stipend for every tree over four they have on their property. This can come back to them at Tax time and the feds sell the earned carbon credits to the polluters. The timber industry would love this for all the forest land they own. It would encourage them to re-plant faster, and be more efficient in getting their tree's bigger, faster.
Your application of a basic mathematical concept to prove the accuracy of a formula is appreciated.
Thank you for proving the truth of my signature.
Have a great weekend.
Let me put this another way.
You have property in Arizona you want to sell as seaside property.
What could you do to convince someone that it was soon to become seaside property?
Well first you can convince them that the seas are going to rise. Again. But this time it's because man is causing it and not nature. Like how many other times we have evidence to support.
Now think things through.
Who is generating the carbon credits, how much does it cost to make them, how much are they selling for, and where is the money going?
You can but your not supposed to be charging admission.
Now the misuse of scientific research like is done in denial of climate change fraud,
FTFY
And that's exactly what I stated in my post too.