Hehe... nice...
My (pwgen generated) passwords usually end up in that same way.
After a month of every day use, the keystrokes sits in my fingers, and I'll have a hard time remembering them, if I haven't got a keyboard in front of me...
Yes. You're right. It's "supported". But only as an import/export option...
Furthermore Outlook (2000) imports only the first vCard (after the user has confirmed it) in a file containing more than one vCard, which makes distributing an addressbook as vCards a living hell. Oh, the "supported" version is 2.1, not the "new" 3.0 one from 1998...
I never got the iCal support working but, as mentioned in http://www.scheduleworld.com/outlookInteroperabili ty.html section 2, there are subtleties involved here.
Usually windows blocks me from deleting files (used by another process)
I'd hate having Jupiter and/or Venus crash land in my backyard ... ;-) ...
I do realize that. But then again, I've been told that for as long as I can remember.
The part that strikes me this time, is the year 2045...
I dont give a sh*t.
As a software developer I wont care before computers might be able to program themselves. ...
Then again -- my pension is to be paid out from 2045
Hehe ... nice ... ...
My (pwgen generated) passwords usually end up in that same way.
After a month of every day use, the keystrokes sits in my fingers, and I'll have a hard time remembering them, if I haven't got a keyboard in front of me
-Nybo
Just *don't* get hacked... d8^)
-Nybo
Never ever call that man "Sir"...!
That would indicate that he's a citizen of Commonwealth, which he's surely isn't.
-Nybo
Yes. You're right. It's "supported". But only as an import/export option...
Furthermore Outlook (2000) imports only the first vCard (after the user has confirmed it) in a file containing more than one vCard, which makes distributing an addressbook as vCards a living hell. Oh, the "supported" version is 2.1, not the "new" 3.0 one from 1998...
I never got the iCal support working but, as mentioned in http://www.scheduleworld.com/outlookInteroperabili ty.html section 2, there are subtleties involved here.
-Nybo
Then how come M$ not keen on using open standards?
Take Outlook for instance.
Works great with M$Exchange, but how about the support for SyncML, iCal, vCard and so on?...
-Nybo