IMNBAFBNYCL or anything, but it seems to me that this guy doesn't really have a case. Plus, everyone knows you're not supposed to believe anything until its been posted on at least two different blogs. TV just isn't a reliable source of information anymore.
For example, your brain is "hardwired" from birth to recognize human faces, and to emit "happy juice" when the faces are familar or matched with motherly smells.
My 'happy juice' can be stimulated to emission by data from a storage device that only needs to be able to store a few hundred KB in JPEG format.
Search for a common word on google (eg "the"). Then write a bot to visit every link in turn, and every link referenced by those pages (ie recurse to a depth of 2).
...and then spend the next 10 years in a cell with Gary Glitter trying to figure out why you didn't think to exclude the script from visiting sites with links like 'the best ch1ld pr0n'.
IMNBAFBNYCL or anything, but it seems to me that this guy doesn't really have a case. Plus, everyone knows you're not supposed to believe anything until its been posted on at least two different blogs. TV just isn't a reliable source of information anymore.
There, fixed that for you.
Suggesting anything else is pure lunacy.
Pun intended, I presume. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunacy
For example, your brain is "hardwired" from birth to recognize human faces, and to emit "happy juice" when the faces are familar or matched with motherly smells.
My 'happy juice' can be stimulated to emission by data from a storage device that only needs to be able to store a few hundred KB in JPEG format.
Write a script to do the following:
Search for a common word on google (eg "the"). Then write a bot to visit every link in turn, and every link referenced by those pages (ie recurse to a depth of 2).
...and then spend the next 10 years in a cell with Gary Glitter trying to figure out why you didn't think to exclude the script from visiting sites with links like 'the best ch1ld pr0n'.
Lemme guess - it was on goatse.cx right?