You guys are used to see FB as the evil part of the story;) but it clearly demonstrates how fragile is their business: It seems to me more like a desperate way to protect their data in a way only them can get some money. After all, it's already some time that FB is searching some way to get profit, and it would be a step back if some guy would take one of the few opportunities and make it publicly available.
Is the link of the in-depth review using Web 2.0? If yes, I need urgently a patch, as it is not working on my Firefox... Where can I find the bugzilla to post a new bug? When will be 2.1 released?
Google has a really good feature for me, as a researcher, that I don't see in MSN: searching into pdf files.
In a simple search for a title of a paper of my research group, the results in Google where more accurate, with the paper (in pdf format) as a result, and results in citeseer too. A search for words in the abstract resulted in papers related to my work too.
I think that in searches more specific than "Linux" or "Microsoft", Google still wins.
Slashdot Mirror
You guys are used to see FB as the evil part of the story ;) but it clearly demonstrates how fragile is their business: It seems to me more like a desperate way to protect their data in a way only them can get some money. After all, it's already some time that FB is searching some way to get profit, and it would be a step back if some guy would take one of the few opportunities and make it publicly available.
Is the link of the in-depth review using Web 2.0? If yes, I need urgently a patch, as it is not working on my Firefox... Where can I find the bugzilla to post a new bug? When will be 2.1 released?
Google has a really good feature for me, as a researcher, that I don't see in MSN: searching into pdf files. In a simple search for a title of a paper of my research group, the results in Google where more accurate, with the paper (in pdf format) as a result, and results in citeseer too. A search for words in the abstract resulted in papers related to my work too. I think that in searches more specific than "Linux" or "Microsoft", Google still wins.